Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:38:21.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal Variation in Macartney Rose (Rosa bracteata) Response to Herbicide Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephen F. Enloe  and
Dwight K. Lauer
Stephen F. Enloe*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32653 Analyst, Silvics Analytic, Wingate, NC 28174
Dwight K. Lauer
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32653 Analyst, Silvics Analytic, Wingate, NC 28174
*
∗Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Macartney rose is an aggressive, thorny shrub that suppresses forage production and strongly hinders cattle grazing in southern pastures. Previous studies have found this weed to be extremely difficult to control with most pasture herbicides. We conducted two studies in central Alabama to assess several new herbicide chemistries applied at spring, early fall, and late fall timings. In the first study, we compared aminocyclopyrachlor, tank mixed with either 2,4-D, triclopyr, metsulfuron, or chlorsulfuron, with the commercial standard, picloram + 2,4-D. In the second study, we compared aminopyralid, tank mixed with either 2,4-D or metsulfuron and triclopyr + fluroxypyr, to the commercial standard, picloram + 2,4-D. Aminocyclopyrachlor + chlorsulfuron or metsulfuron and aminopyralid + 2,4-D or metsulfuron provided acceptable control and were comparable to picloram + 2,4-D at the early fall timing. Macartney rose control with treatments applied at the late fall timing tended to be less than commercially acceptable levels. We found that no herbicide treatment controlled Macartney rose at the spring timing. In addition, triclopyr + fluroxypyr did not control Macartney rose at any application timing. These results indicate that the early fall timing was optimal and that both aminocyclopyrachlor and aminopyralid can provide good Macartney rose control when mixed with certain other herbicides, including metsulfuron.

Rosa bracteata es un arbusto espinoso agresivo que suprime la producción de forrajes e inhibe fuertemente el pastoreo del ganado en pastizales del sur. Estudios previos han encontrado que esta maleza es extremadamente difícil de controlar con la mayoría de los herbicidas para pastos. Nosotros realizamos dos estudios en el centro de Alabama para evaluar varios herbicidas químicos nuevos, aplicados en la primavera, temprano en el otoño, y tarde en el otoño. En el primer estudio, comparamos con el estándar comercial, picloram + 2,4-D aplicaciones de aminocyclopyrachlor, mezclado ya fuese con 2,4-D, triclopyr, metsulfuron, o chlorsulfuron. En el segundo estudio, comparamos aminopyralid, mezclado en tanque con ya fuese 2,4-D o metsulfuron y triclopyr + fluroxypyr, con el estándar comercial, picloram + 2,4-D. Aminocyclopyrachlor + chlorsulfuron o metsulfuron y aminopyralid + 2,4-D o metsulfuron brindaron un control aceptable y fueron comparables con picloram + 2,4-D para aplicaciones temprano en el otoño. El control de R. bracteata con tratamientos aplicados tarde en el otoño tendió a ser inferior a los niveles comercialmente aceptables. Encontramos que ningún tratamiento con aplicaciones de herbicidas en la primavera controló R. bracteata. Adicionalmente, triclopyr + fluroxypyr no controló R. bracteata en ningún momento de aplicación. Estos resultados indican que temprano en el otoño fue el momento de aplicación óptimo y que tanto aminocyclopyrachlor como aminopyralid pueden brindar buen control de R. bracteata cuando se mezclan con otros herbicidas incluyendo metsulfuron.

Keywords

2,4-DaminocyclopyrachloraminopyralidchlorsulfuronfluroxypyrmetsulfuronpicloramtriclopyrMacartney rose, Rosa bracteata J.C. Wendl ROSBCHerbicide application timinginvasive rosemixed grass pasture
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 758 - 764
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate editor for this paper: Bradley Hanson, University of California, Davis

References

Literature Cited

Abe, DG, Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA, Leon, RG, Odero, DC (2016) Weed control in Florida pastures using aminocyclopyrachlor. Weed Technol 30: 271–278 Google Scholar
Anonymous (2014) Method® 240 SL herbicide label. Wilmington, DE: DuPont. 14 pGoogle Scholar
Bovey, RW, Haas, RH, Meyer, RE (1972) Daily and seasonal response of huisache and Macartney rose to herbicides. Weed Sci 20: 577–580 Google Scholar
Enloe, SF, Kline, WK, Aulakh, JS, Bethke, RK, Gladney, JB, Lauer, DK (2013) Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) response to herbicide and mowing treatments. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 6: 260–267 Google Scholar
Ferrell, J, Sellers, B, Jennings, E (2012) Herbicidal control of largeleaf lantana (Lantana camara) Weed Technol 26: 554–558 Google Scholar
Ferrell, JA, Sellers, BA, MacDonald, GE, Kline, WN (2009) Influence of herbicide and application timing on blackberry control. Weed Technol 23: 531–534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, MN, Herms, CP, Cardina, J (2007) Cold weather application of glyphosate for garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) control. Weed Technol 21: 656–660 Google Scholar
Gordon, RA, Scifres, CJ, Mutz, JL (1982) Integration of burning and picloram pellets for Macartney rose control. J Range Manag 35: 427–430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, RH, Lehman, SK, Morton, HL (1970). Influence of mowing and spraying dates on herbicidal control of Macartney rose. Weed Sci 18: 33–37 Google Scholar
Harrington, TB, Miller, JH (2005) Effects of application rate, timing, and formulation of glyphosate and triclopyr on control of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense). Weed Technol 19: 47–54 Google Scholar
Hume, HH (1943) The Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata). Am Rose Annu 28: 29–30 Google Scholar
Hutchinson, JT, Langeland, KA, Meisenburg, M (2011) Field trials for herbicide control of coral ardisia (Ardisia crenata) in natural areas of north-central Florida. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4: 234–238 Google Scholar
Littell, RC, Milliken, GA, Stroup, WW, Wolfinger, RD, Schabenberger, O (2006) SAS for Mixed Models. 2nd edn, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 814 pGoogle Scholar
Matocha, ME, Baumann, PA, McGinty, JA, Janak, TW (2014) Forage tolerance and weed management with aminocyclopyrachlor in Texas pastures. Page 24 in Burgos, NR, ed. Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society 67th Annual Meeting. [Abstract] Las Cruces, NM: SWSS Google Scholar
McCully, WG (1951) Recovery of viability of Macartney rose seeds fed to cattle. J Range Manag 25: 386–389 Google Scholar
Meyer, RE (1982) Brush response to spacing and individual-plant herbicide treatments. Weed Sci 30: 378–384.Google Scholar
Meyer, RE, Bovey, RW (1973) Control of woody plants with herbicide mixtures. Weed Sci 21: 423–426 Google Scholar
Meyer, RE, Bovey, RW (1980) Hexazinone and other herbicides on Texas woody plants. Weed Sci 28: 358–362 Google Scholar
Meyer, RE, Bovey, RW (1984) Response of Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) and understory vegetation to herbicides. Weed Sci 32: 63–67 Google Scholar
Meyer, RE, Bovey, RW (1990) Influence of sulfonylurea and other herbicides on selected woody and herbaceous species. Weed Sci 38: 249–255 Google Scholar
Phillips, WP, Israel, TD, Mueller, TC, Armel, GR, West, DR, Green, JD, Rhodes, N (2015) Utility of aminocyclopyrachlor for control of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) and tall ironweed (Vernonia gigantea) in cool-season grass pastures. Weed Technol 30:472–477Google Scholar
Reed, TM, Fitzgerald, CH (1979) Chemical control of multiflora rose. Page 220–224 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society 32nd Annual Meeting. Las Cruces, NM: SWSS Google Scholar
Scifres, CJ (1975) Systems for Improving Macartney Rose Infested Coastal Prairie Rangeland. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station MP 1223. 12 pGoogle Scholar
Shaner, DL, ed. (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp 41–42 Google Scholar
Sherrick, SL, Holt, HA (1977) Preliminary multiflora rose control results. Page 125–127 in Proceedings of the North Central Weed Science Society 32nd Annual Meeting. Las Cruces, NM: NCWSS Google Scholar
Taylor, IT (1949) The Macartney rose. Tex J Sci 1: 54–56 Google Scholar