Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:49:34.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Science and Public Policy: Shotgun Wedding or Marriage Made in Heaven?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Otto Doering
Otto Doering*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agric. Econ., Purdue Univ., W. Lafayette, IN 47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scientists, above all others, approach public policy believing it to be scientifically rational—as it has been portrayed by the Good Government Movement, the League of Women Voters, and Mark Twain. Today, the problem is that public policy does not appear rational to scientists. While there is great opportunity for scientific input, neither the policy process nor the most influential policy input is necessarily scientifically rational. To understand the relationship of science to policy, one has to look at how the public views science today, the style of policy, the style of science, and how the policy process may have been captured by “irrational” interests. Only then can a realistic marriage be made between science and policy.

Keywords

History of science and governmentrole of science
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 875 - 877
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1976. Experiment planned to test feasibility of a “Science Court.” Science 193:129.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1976. If I were the Science Adviser; some luminaries have their say. Science 193:464.Google Scholar
3. Medawar, P. B. 1984. p. 19–20 in The Limits of Science. Harper & Row, New York, NY.Google Scholar
4. Silverstein, Arthur, 1981. p. 00 in Pure Politics and Impure Science. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
5. Snow, C. P. 1969. The Two Cultures and a Second Look. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
6. Twain, M. 1984. A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court. University of California Press, Berkeley. CA. p. 4.Google Scholar
7. Weaver, W. 1961. The imperfections of science. Am. Sci. 49(1): 108–113.Google Scholar
8. Werskey, G. 1978. The Visible College: The Collective Biography of British Scientific Socialists of the 1930s. Holt Rinehart Winston, New York, NY.Google Scholar