Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:01:56.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Salts and Surfactants Influence Nicosulfuron Activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John D. Nalewaja ,
Tadeusz Praczyk  and
Robert Matysiak
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Tadeusz Praczyk
Affiliation:
North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Robert Matysiak
Affiliation:
North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in the greenhouse to determine nicosulfuron activity on large crabgrass as influenced by surfactant, ammonium salt adjuvants, and various calcium, sodium, and magnesium salts in the spray carrier. Nicosulfuron activity varied with surfactant. Ammonium salt adjuvants at 0.2 M (ammonia) and sodium, calcium, or magnesium salts at 0.02 M (cation) increased or decreased nicosulfuron activity dependent on the specific salt and surfactant. Spray carrier surface tension or pH of the spray solution did not relate to nicosulfuron activity. The specific ammonium component influenced nicosulfuron activity differently depending on the surfactant. Increases in ammonium nitrate concentration decreased, nicosulfuron activity with Pluronic® P85 surfactant and increased activity with X-77® surfactant. The response to ammonium nitrate was less pronounced at high surfactant concentrations. Sodium bicarbonate antagonism of nicosulfuron activity was overcome by ammonium sulfate and 28% aqueous nitrogen fertilizer in the presence of several oil and surfactant adjuvants. The results indicate the importance of surfactant selection for use with nicosulfuron when applied with nitrogen salts.

Keywords

Nicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]-amino]sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamidelarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSAAdjuvantsantagonismapplication technologyoil adjuvantsspray carrierDigitaria sanguinalisDIGSA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 587 - 593
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Green, J. M. 1992. Increasing efficacy with adjuvants and herbicide mixtures. Proc. First Int. Weed Control Cong. p. 187–192.Google Scholar
2. Green, J. M. and Green, J. H. 1993. Surfactant structure and concentration strongly affect rimsulfuron activity. Weed Technol. 7:633–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Green, J. M., Brown, P. A., Berengut, D., and King, M. G. 1992. Nonionic surfactant properties effects on thifensulfuron performance. p. 525–532 in Foy, C. L., ed. Adjuvants for Agrichemicals. CRC Press Inc. Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
4. Gronwald, J. W., Jourdan, S. W., Wyse, D. L., Somers, D. A., and Magnusson, M. V. 1993. Effect of ammonium sulfate on absorption of imazethapyr by quackgrass and maize cell suspension. Weed Sci. 41:325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interaction of herbicides with other agrichemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
6. Knoche, M. and Bukovac, M. J. 1993. Interaction of surfactant and leaf surface in glyphosate absorption. Weed Sci. 41:87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Liebl, R. A., Zehr, V. B., and Teyker, R. H. 1992. Influence of nitrogen on extracellular pH and bentazon uptake by cultural soybean cells. Weed Sci. 40:418–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Lueschen, W. E., Hoverstad, T. R., and Gonsalus, J. L. 1991. Wooly cupgrass control in corn. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rpt. 48:232–233.Google Scholar
9. Manthey, F. A., Horsley, R. D., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1992. Relationship between surfactant characteristics and the phytotoxicity of CGA-136872. p. 258–270 in Chasin, D. G. and Bode, L. F., eds. Pesticide Formulation and Application Systems: 11th Volume. ASTM STP 112. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
10. Nalewaja, J. D., Koziara, W., Matysiak, R., and Manthey, F. A. 1993. Relation of surfactant HLB to glyphosate phytotoxicity. In Hall, F. R., Berger, P. D., and Collins, H. M., eds. Pesticide Formulation and Application Systems: 14th Volume. ASTM STP 1234. Am. Soc. Test. Mater., Philadelphia, PA. in press.Google Scholar
11. Nalewaja, J. D., Matysiak, R., and Freeman, T. P. 1992. Spray droplet residual of glyphosate in various carriers. Weed Sci. 40:576–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Nalewaja, J. D., Matysiak, R., and Manthey, F. A. 1993. Commercial adjuvants with nicosulfuron and glyphosate. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. No. 314.Google Scholar
13. Owen, M.D.K., Lux, J. F., and Franzenburg, E. L. 1990. Postemergence DPX-9360 herbicide application for wooly cupgrass control in corn. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rpt. 47:335.Google Scholar
14. Policello, G. A. and Murphy, G. J. 1993. The influence of pH on the performance of organosilicone surfactants. 14th Symp. on Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems. Am. Soc. Test. Mater., Philadelphia, PA p. 14 (abstract).Google Scholar
15. Wade, B. R., Riechers, D. E., Liebl, R. A., and Wax, L. M. 1993. The plasma membrane as a barrier to herbicide penetration and site for adjuvants. Pestic. Sci. 37:195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar