Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:38:39.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Russian thistle (Salsola tragus L.) control with soil-active herbicides in no-till fallow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2021

Drew J. Lyon Open the ORCID record for Drew J. Lyon [Opens in a new window] ,
Judit Barroso Open the ORCID record for Judit Barroso [Opens in a new window] ,
Mark E. Thorne ,
Jennifer Gourlie  and
Larry K. Lutcher Open the ORCID record for Larry K. Lutcher [Opens in a new window]
Drew J. Lyon*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
Judit Barroso
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Adams, OR, USA
Mark E. Thorne
Affiliation:
Associate in Research, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
Jennifer Gourlie
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Adams, OR, USA
Larry K. Lutcher
Affiliation:
Professor, Morrow County Extension, Oregon State University, Heppner, OR, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Drew J. Lyon, Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, PO Box 646420, Pullman, WA99164-6420. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The benefits of no-till fallow, which include reduced soil erosion, improved soil health, and increased stored soil water, are in jeopardy because of the widespread development of glyphosate resistance in Russian thistle. The objective of this research was to evaluate the efficacy of soil-active, residual herbicides for Russian thistle control in no-till fallow. The combinations of sulfentrazone + carfentrazone and flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone, and metribuzin alone were each applied in late fall, late winter, and split-applied in late fall and late winter at three sites: Adams, OR, in 2017–2018; Lind, WA, in 2018–2019; and Ralston, WA, in 2019–2020. All treatments provided good to excellent control of the initial flush of Russian thistle when assessed in mid-May, except the late-fall application of metribuzin at all three sites, and the late-fall application of sulfentrazone + carfentrazone at Adams. Cumulative Russian thistle densities, evaluated monthly throughout the fallow season, were lowest for the sulfentrazone + carfentrazone treatments, except for the late-fall application at Adams. However, flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone and metribuzin provided greater control of tumble mustard and prickly lettuce than did sulfentrazone + carfentazone. Sulfentrazone + carfentrazone, flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone, and metribuzin can all be used for Russian thistle control in fallow. To reduce the risk for crop injury to subsequently planted winter wheat, a late-fall application of sulfentrazone + carfentrazone may be the preferred treatment in low-rainfall regions where winter wheat–fallow is commonly practiced. A late-winter application may be preferred in higher rainfall regions where a 3-year rotation (e.g., winter wheat–spring wheat–fallow) is common. Flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone should be considered if other broadleaf weeds, such as tumble mustard or prickly lettuce, are of concern. The use of these soil-applied herbicides will reduce the need for the frequent application of glyphosate for Russian thistle control in no-till fallow.

Keywords

Chemical fallowglyphosate resistanceherbicide persistenceCarfentrazoneflumioxazinglyphosatemetribuzinpyroxasulfonesulfentrazoneprickly lettuceLactuca serriola L. LACSERussian thistleSalsola tragus L. SASKTtumble mustardSisymbrium altissimum L. SSYALwinter wheatTriticum aestivum L.
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , August 2021 , pp. 547 - 553
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Vipan Kumar, Kansas State University

References

Barroso, J, Gourlie, JA, Lutcher, LK, Liu, M, Mallory-Smith, CA (2018) Identification of glyphosate resistance in Salsola tragus in north-eastern Oregon. Pest Manag Sci 74:1089–1093 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barroso, J, Lyon, DJ, Prather, T (2019) Russian thistle management in a wheat-fallow crop rotation. PNW 492, August. A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication. University of Idaho Cooperative Extension System, Oregon State University Extension Service, and the Washington State University Cooperative Extension SystemGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Francis, A (2009) The biology of Canadian weeds. 65. Salsola tragus L. (updated). Can J Plant Sci 89:775–789 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagerty, CH, Fickas, KC, Wysocki, D (2019) Agronomic zones of the dryland Pacific Northwest. PNW 354, March. A Pacific Northwest Extension Publication. University of Idaho Cooperative Extension System, Oregon State University Extension Service, and the Washington State University Cooperative Extension SystemGoogle Scholar
Hammel, JE, Papendick, RI, Campbell, GS (1981) Fallow tillage effects on evaporation and seedzone water content in a dry summer climate. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1016–1022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, RW, Jones, SS, Carter, AH (2013) Wheat cultivar performance and stability between no-till and conventional tillage systems in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. Sustainability 5:882–895 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, JS, Lebaron, HM (1990) Significance and distribution of herbicide resistance. Weed Technol 4:141–149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V, Jha, P (2015) Effective preemergence and postemergence herbicide programs for kochia control. Weed Technol 29:24–34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V, Spring, JF, Lyon, DJ, Burke, IC, Jha, P (2017) Glyphosate-resistant Russian-thistle (Salsola tragus) identified in Montana and Washington. Weed Technol 31:238–251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutcher, LK (2015) Delayed glyphosate application for no-till fallow in the driest region of the inland Pacific Northwest. Weed Technol 29:707–715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, WL, Young, FL, Bolton, RP (2001) Monitoring Russian-thistle (Salsola iberica) root growth using a scanner-based, portable mesorhizotron. Weed Technol 15:762–766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, DE (1999) The impact of herbicide-resistant weeds on Kansas agriculture. Weed Technol 13:632–635 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prather, TS, Ditomaso, JM, Holt, JS (2000) Herbicide resistance: definition and management strategies. Publication 8012. Oakland, CA: University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Google Scholar
Saari, LL, Cotterman, JC, Smith, WF, Primiani, MM (1992) Sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in common chickweed, perennial ryegrass, and Russian thistle. Pest Biochem Phys 42:110–118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (2019) SAS OnlineDoc. Version 9.4. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Google Scholar
Schillinger, WF (2007) Ecology and control of Russian thistle (Salsola iberica) after spring wheat harvest. Weed Sci 55:381–385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillinger, WF, Papendick, RI (2008) Then and now: 125 years of dryland wheat farming in the inland Pacific Northwest. Agron J 100:S166–S182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillinger, WF, Papendick, RI, McCool, DK (2010) Soil and water challenges for Pacific Northwest agriculture. In Zobeck TM, Schillinger WF, eds. Soil and Water Conservation Advances in the United States. Special Publication 60:47–49. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillinger, WF, Young, FL (2000) Soil water use and growth of Russian thistle after wheat harvest. Agron J 92:167–172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillinger, WF, Young, FL (2004) Cropping systems research in the world’s driest rainfed region. Agron J 96:1182–1187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, DL, ed (2014) Herbicide Handbook. Tenth edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. 513 p Google Scholar
Sharratt, B, Wendling, L, Feng, G (2010) Windblown dust affected by tillage intensity during summer fallow. Aeolian Res 2:129–134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, GP, Thill, DC, Mallory-Smith, CA (1994) Sulfonylurea-resistant Russian thistle (Salsola iberica) survey in Washington state. Weed Technol 8:258–264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallings, GP, Thill, DC, Mallory-Smith, CA, Lass, LW (1995) Plant movement and seed dispersal of Russian thistle (Salsola iberica). Weed Sci 43:63–69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, SI, Sauder, CA, Beckie, HJ (2010) Acetolactate synthase (ALS) target-site mutations in ALS inhibitor-resistant Russian-thistle (Salsola tragus). Weed Sci 58:244–251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, FL (1986) Russian thistle (Salsola iberica) growth and development in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci 34:901–905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar