Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:37:35.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rotational Cropping Systems to Reduce Cheat (Bromus secalinus) Densities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jon C. Stone ,
Thomas F. Peeper  and
Amanda E. Stone
Jon C. Stone*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
Amanda E. Stone
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Southern Great Plains, producers of hard red winter wheat seek sustainable methods for controlling cheat and improving economic returns. Experiments were conducted at two sites in north-central Oklahoma to determine the effect of cheat management programs, with various weed control strategies, on cheat densities and total net returns. The cheat management programs, initiated following harvest of winter wheat, included conventionally tilled, double-crop grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) followed by soybean (Glycine max L.); and continuous winter wheat. Rotating out of winter wheat for one growing season increased yield of succedent wheat up to 32% and 42% at Billings and Ponca City, respectively. Dockage due to cheat in the succedent wheat was reduced up to 78% and 87% by rotating out of winter wheat for one growing season at Billings and Ponca City, respectively. Cheat management programs including a crop rotation with herbicides applied to the grain sorghum, except for an application of atrazine + metolachlor at Ponca City, improved total net returns over the nontreated continuous wheat option. Cheat panicles in the succedent wheat were reduced up to 87% by rotation out of winter wheat for one growing season.

Keywords

Atrazine + metolachlorcheat, Bromus secalinus L. # BROSEgrain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Pioneer 8500’, ‘Dekalb DK28E’soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr., ‘Dekalb CX367RR’wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘2137’Economicsnet returnsOklahomaFb, followed byNSD, no significant differenceOM, organic matter
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 445 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: District Conservationist, USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, 5501 North Pleasant View Road, Newkirk, OK 74647.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1994. Oklahoma Agricultural Statistics. Oklahoma City, OK: Oklahoma Department of Agriculture. 104 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1999. OSU Extension Agents' Handbook of Insect, Plant Disease, and Weed Control. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Rep. E-832. 607 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2000. Oklahoma Agricultural Statistics. Oklahoma City, OK: Oklahoma Department of Agriculture. 104 p.Google Scholar
Baker, J. L. 2000. 1999–2000 Grain Yields and Economic Returns from Rye, Oat, Wheat, and Triticale Varieties and Strains. Ardmore, OK: Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc. Rep. NF-CRR-00-13. 8 p.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., Roberts, J. R., Stone, A. E., and Peeper, T. F. 2000. Survey of Winter Grasses in Wheat, Stubble Burning, and Crops Grown in North-central Oklahoma. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University PT 2000-16. Pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Crabtree, R. J. and Rupp, R. N. 1980. Double and monocropped wheat and soybeans under different tillage and row spacings. Agron. J. 72:445–448.Google Scholar
Culver, J. 1968. Soil survey of Kay County, Oklahoma. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service). 68 p.Google Scholar
Daugovish, O., Lyon, D. J., and Baltensperger, D. D. 1999. Cropping systems to control winter annual grasses in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 13:120–126.Google Scholar
Driver, J. E., Peeper, T. F., and Koscelny, J. A. 1993. Cheat (Bromus secalinus) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Technol. 7:851–854.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W. and Stahlman, P. W. 1996. Dose-responses of weeds and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) to MON 37500. Weed Technol. 10:870–875.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W. and Stahlman, P. W. 2001. Dose responses of weeds and winter wheat to MKH 6561. Weed Sci. 49:788–791.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., Basta, N., Hattey, J., Raun, B., and Zhang, H. 1998. OSU Soil Test Interpretations. Stillwater, OK: Cooperative Extension Service, Okalahoma State University Facts No. 2225. 8 p.Google Scholar
Kletke, D. and Doye, D. 2000. Oklahoma farm and ranch custom rates, 1999– 2000. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Current Report CR-205. 4 p.Google Scholar
Krenzer, E. G. Jr. 1994. Wheat for Pasture. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service F-2586. 6 p.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. and Dyck, E. 1993. Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecol. Appl. 3:92–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, B. L., Al-Khatib, K., Stahlman, P. W., and Isakson, P. J. 2000. Mon 37500 efficacy as affected by rate, adjuvants, and carriers. Weed Technol. 14:750–754.Google Scholar
Ratliff, R. L. and Peeper, T. F. 1987. Bromus control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with the ethylthio analog of metribuzin. Weed Technol. 1:235–241.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1998. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 7.00. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis System Institute.Google Scholar
Stahlman, P. W. and Miller, S. D. 1990. Downy brome (Bromus tectorum) interference and economic thresholds in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 38:224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swafford, B. 1967. Soil Survey of Garfield County Oklahoma. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly Soil Conservation Service). P. 46.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A. 1984. Integrated systems for control and management of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in cropland. Weed Sci. 32: (Suppl. 1). 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar