Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:14:10.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roller Application of Clopyralid for Huisache, Acacia farnesiana, Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Charles J. Scifres ,
Richard A. Crane ,
Ben H. Koerth  and
Robert C. Flinn
Charles J. Scifres
Affiliation:
Dep. Range Sci., Tex. A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Richard A. Crane
Affiliation:
Dep. Range Sci., Tex. A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Ben H. Koerth
Affiliation:
Dep. Range Sci., Tex. A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Robert C. Flinn
Affiliation:
Dep. Range Sci., Tex. A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in south Texas from 1983 to 1987 to evaluate clopyralid for huisache control using a carpeted roller. Huisache control with clopyralid applied as broadcast sprays or with a carpeted roller generally equaled that from the same rates of picloram or of 1:1 mixtures of clopyralid plus picloram. Applications of herbicides in the fall generally were more effective than in the spring, regardless of application method. In most cases, the herbicides at 48 to 60 g ae/L fall applied with a carpeted roller killed 70% or more of the huisache. Herbicide efficacy was not reduced when all huisache top growth was removed within 1 week after roller application of a 1:1 mixture of clopyralid and picloram at 60 g ae/L. The treat-and-cut sequence should improve the quality of hay from huisache-infested pastures.

Keywords

Clopyralid, 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidpicloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidhuisache, Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. # ACAFABrush controlpasture improvementpicloramACAFA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 1988 , pp. 317 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bovey, R. W., and Mayeux, H. S. 1980. Effectivness and distribution of 2,4,5-T, triclopyr, picloram, and 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid in honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa). Weed Sci. 30:666–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W., and Meyer, R. E. 1985. Herbicide mixtures for control of honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Weed Sci. 33:349–352.Google Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W., Baur, J. R., and Morton, H. L. 1970. Control of huisache and associated woody species in south Texas. J. Range Manage. 23:47–50.Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W., Davis, F. S., and Merkle, M. G. 1967. Distribution of picloram in huisache after foliar and soil applications. Weeds 15:245–249.Google Scholar
5. Bovey, R. W., Haas, R. H., and Meyer, R. E. 1972. Daily and seasonal response of huisache and Macartney rose to herbicides. Weed Sci. 20:577–580.Google Scholar
6. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H. Jr., and Meyer, R. E. 1986. Concentration of 2,4,5-T, triclopyr, picloram, and clopyralid in honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) stems. Weed Sci. 34:211–217.Google Scholar
7. Bovey, R. W., Ketchersid, M. L., and Merkle, M. G. 1979. Distribution of triclopyr and picloram in huisache (Acacia farnesiana). Weed Sci. 27:527–530.Google Scholar
8. Jacoby, P. W., Meadors, C. H., and Foster, M. A. 1981. Control of honey mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa) with 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid. Weed Sci. 29:376–378.Google Scholar
9. Mayeux, H. S. Jr. 1987. Application of herbicides on rangelands with a carpeted roller: Shrub density influences volume. dosage and rate. Weed Sci. 35:444–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Mayeux, H. S. Jr. 1987. Application of herbicides on rangelands with a carpeted roller: Timing of treatment in dense stands of honey mesquite. J. Range Manage. 40:348–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Mayeux, H. S. Jr., and Crane, R. A. 1983. The brush roller–An experimental herbicide applicator with potential for range weed and brush control. Rangelands 5:53–56.Google Scholar
12. Mayeux, H. S. Jr., and Crane, R. A. 1984. Application of herbicides on rangelands with a carpeted roller: Control of goldenweeds (Isocoma spp.) and false broomweed (Ericameria austrotexana). Weed Sci. 32:845–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Mayeux, H. S. Jr., and Crane, R. A. 1985. Application of herbicides on rangelands with a carpeted roller: Evaluation of four herbicides for control of honey mesquite. J. Range Manage. 38:233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Messersmith, C. G., and Lym, R. G. 1985. Roller application of picloram for leafy spurge control in pastures. Weed Sci. 33:258–262.Google Scholar
15. Meyer, R. E., and Bovey, R. W. 1986. Influence of environment and stage of growth on honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) response to herbicides. Weed Sci. 34:287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Mutz, J. L., Scifres, C. J., Drawe, D. L., Box, T. W., and Whitson, R. E. 1978. Range vegetation after mechanical brush treatment on the coastal prairie. Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 1191.Google Scholar
17. Powell, J., and Baker, C. V. 1972. Growth rate of sprouts after top removal of huisache [Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd.] in south Texas. Southwest. Nat. 17:191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Rasmussen, G. A., Scifres, C. J., and Drawe, D. L. 1983. Huisache growth, browse quality, and use following burning. J. Range Manage. 36:337–342.Google Scholar
19. Scifres, C. J. 1980. Brush Management. Principles and Practices for Texas and the Southwest. Tex. A&M Univ. Press, College Stn.Google Scholar