Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:22:55.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk Assessment of Glyphosate Resistance in Western Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hugh J. Beckie ,
K. Neil Harker ,
Linda M. Hall ,
Frederick A. Holm  and
Robert H. Gulden
Hugh J. Beckie*
Affiliation:
, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) Research Centre, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2
K. Neil Harker
Affiliation:
AAFC Research Centre, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada T4L 1W1
Linda M. Hall
Affiliation:
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5
Frederick A. Holm
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5A8
Robert H. Gulden
Affiliation:
University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

With increasing incidence of glyphosate-resistant weeds worldwide, greater farmer awareness of the importance of glyphosate stewardship and proactive glyphosate-resistance management is needed. A Web-based decision-support tool (http://www.weedtool.com) comprising 10 questions has been developed primarily for farmers in western Canada to assess the relative risk of selection for glyphosate-resistant weeds on a field-by-field basis. We describe the rationale for the questions and how a response to a particular question influences the risk rating. Practices with the greatest risk weighting in western Canadian cropping systems are lack of crop-rotation diversity (growing mainly oilseeds) and a high frequency of glyphosate-resistant crops in the rotation. Three case scenarios are outlined—low, moderate, and high risk of glyphosate-resistance evolution. Based on the overall risk rating, three best-management practices are recommended to reduce the risk of glyphosate resistance in weeds.

Con la creciente incidencia en la maleza de resistencia a glifosato a nivel mundial, es necesario crear en los agricultores mayor conciencia sobre la importancia de la vigilancia en el uso glifosato y de su manejo proactivo para evitar la resistencia al herbicida antes mencionado. Se ha desarrollado, primordialmente para los agricultores en el occidente de Canadá, una herramienta en la web de apoyo a decisiones (http://www.weedtool.com) que comprende 10 preguntas para evaluar el riesgo relativo de selección para resistencia a glifosato en maleza, campo por campo. Describimos el porqué de las preguntas y cómo la respuesta a una pregunta en particular influye en la calificación del riesgo. Prácticas con la mayor ponderación de riesgo en los sistemas de cultivo en el occidente de Canadá son: la falta de diversidad en la rotación de cultivos (cultivar oleaginosas principalmente) y una alta frecuencia de cultivos resistentes al glifosato en la rotación. Tres escenarios se describen: evolución de resistencia al glifosato de bajo, moderado y alto riesgo. Basado en el nivel general de riesgo, se recomiendan tres mejores prácticas de manejo para reducir en la maleza, el riesgo de resistencia a glifosato.

Keywords

GlyphosateCrop rotationdecision-support systemgenetically modified cropsherbicide application frequencyherbicide resistanceintegrated weed management
Type
Education/Extension
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 159 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beckie, H. J. 2006. Herbicide-resistant weeds: management tactics and practices. Weed Technol. 20:793–814.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Harker, K. N., Hall, L. M., Warwick, S. I., Légère, A., Sikkema, P. H., Clayton, G. W., Thomas, A. G., Leeson, J. Y., Séguin-Swartz, G., and Simard, M. J. 2006. A decade of herbicide-resistant crops in Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci 86:1243–1264.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Brenzil, C. A., Hall, L. M., Holzgang, G., Lozinski, C., and Shirriff, S. 2008a. Weed resistance monitoring in the Canadian Prairies. Weed Technol. 22:530–543.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Hall, L. M., and Brenzil, C. A. 2008b. Risk assessment of weed resistance in the Canadian Prairies. Weed Technol. 22:741–746.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Harker, K. N., O'Donovan, J. T., Beckie, H. J., and Smith, E. G. 2008. Ongoing development of integrated weed management systems on the Canadian prairies. Weed Sci. 56:146–150.Google Scholar
Clayton, G. W., Harker, K. N., O'Donovan, J. T., Baig, M. N., and Kidnie, M. J. 2002. Glyphosate timing and tillage system effects on glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus). Weed Technol. 16:124–130.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Grey, T. L., Vencill, W. K., Kichler, J. M., Webster, T. M., Brown, S. M., York, A. C., Davis, J. W., and Hanna, W. W. 2006. Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci. 54:620–626.Google Scholar
Diggle, A., Evans, F., O'Donovan, J., and Storrie, A. 2008. Simulating the present and future state of glyphosate resistance in weeds in contrasting environments and cropping systems. Pages. 33. in. Proceedings of the 5th Int. Weed Science Congress. Vancouver, Canada International Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O. and Powles, S. B. 2009. Glyphosate-resistant crops and weeds: now and in the future. AgBioForum 12:346–357.Google Scholar
Ehler, L. E. 2006. Integrated pest management (IPM): definition, historical development and implementation, and the other IPM. Pest Manag. Sci 62:787–789.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N., Clayton, G. W., Blackshaw, R. E., O'Donovan, J. T., Lupwayi, N. Z., Johnson, E. N., Gan, Y., Zentner, R. P., Lafond, G. P., and Irvine, R. B. 2005. Glyphosate-resistant spring wheat production system effects on weed communities. Weed Sci. 53:451–464.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N., O'Donovan, J. T., Irvine, R. B., Turkington, T. K., and Clayton, G. W. 2009. Integrating cropping systems with cultural techniques augments wild oat (Avena fatua) management in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Weed Sci. 57:326–337.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 2010. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed: May 4, 2010.Google Scholar
Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Beckie, H. J., Van Acker, R. C., and Andrews, T. 2004. Do Manitoba producers reduce in-crop herbicide rates?. Pages. 89. in. Proceedings of the 2003 National Meeting. Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC Canadian Weed Science Society. http://www.cwss-scm.ca. Accessed: 31 May 2010.Google Scholar
Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., Brenzil, C. A., and Beckie, H. J. 2005. Do Saskatchewan producers reduce in-crop herbicide rates?. In. Proceedings of the 2004 National Meeting. Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC Canadian Weed Science Society. http://www.cwss-scm.ca. Accessed: 31 May 2010.Google Scholar
Monsanto Canada, Inc 2010. Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed Confirmed in Ontario. March 31, 2010 News Release. http://www.monsanto.ca/about/news/2010/03_31_10.asp. Accessed: May 4, 2010.Google Scholar
Monsanto Company 2010. Weed Resistance Risk Assessment: United States. http://www.weedtool.com Accessed: May 4, 2010.Google Scholar
Neuman, W. and Pollack, A. 2010. Farmers cope with Roundup-resistant weeds. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/04/business/energy-environment/04weed.html?pagewanted=1&emc=eta1. Accessed: May 4, 2010.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., Blackshaw, R. E., Harker, K. N., Clayton, G. W., Moyer, J. R., Dosdall, L. M., Maurice, D. C., and Turkington, T. K. 2007. Integrated approaches to managing weeds in spring-sown crops in western Canada. Crop Prot 26:390–398.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., Harker, K. N., Clayton, G. W., and Blackshaw, R. E. 2006. Comparison of a glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus L.) system with traditional herbicide regimes. Weed Technol. 20:494–501.Google Scholar
Osunsami, S. 2009. Killer pig weeds threaten crops in the south. ABC World News. http://abcnews.go.com/WN/pig-weed-threatens-agriculture-industry-overtaking-fields-crops/story?id=8766404. Accessed: May 4, 2010.Google Scholar
Powles, S. B. 2008. Evolution in action: glyphosate-resistant weeds threaten world crops. Outlook Pest Manag 19:256–259.Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture 2010. Guide to Crop Protection: Weeds, Plant Diseases, Insects. http://www.agriculture.gov.sk.ca/Guide_to_Crop_Protection. Accessed: April 22, 2010.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada 2007. 2006 Census of Agriculture. http://www.statscan.gc.ca. Accessed: May 4, 2010.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada 2009. November Estimate of Production of Principal Field Crops. Field Crop Reporting Series. Catalogue no. 22-002-X. http://www.statscan.gc.ca. Accessed: May 4, 2010.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Leeson, J. Y., Beckie, H. J., and Hall, L. M. 2003. Herbicide use patterns and herbicide-resistant weed awareness: results from grower surveys in Alberta, Canada. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr 43:66.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J. 2001. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci. 49:703–705.Google Scholar
Vila-Aiub, M. M., Balbi, M. C., Gundel, P. E., Ghersa, C. M., and Powles, S. B. 2007. Evolution of glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Sci. 55:566–571.Google Scholar