Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:23:09.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Cultivars to Glufosinate-Ammonium and Diquat Used as Desiccants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jerry A. Ivany  and
J. Brian Sanderson
Jerry A. Ivany*
Affiliation:
Weed Control and Crop Management, respectively, Crops and Livestock Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 440 University Ave., Charlottetown, PE C1A 4N6
J. Brian Sanderson
Affiliation:
Weed Control and Crop Management, respectively, Crops and Livestock Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 440 University Ave., Charlottetown, PE C1A 4N6
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Desiccants are used in potato production to remove vines before harvest to make harvest easier. We evaluated the new herbicide glufosinate-ammonium for potential as a vine desiccant, for its effect on seed tuber sprouting, and plant growth the following season. Glufosinate-ammonium was applied at 0, 0.3, 0.45, 0.6, and 0.75 kg ai/ha and compared with diquat at 0.84 kg ai/ha when applied as desiccants in mid-September in 1997 and 1998. Potato leaf and vine desiccation were rated 3, 7, and 14 d after treatment (DAT). Yields were obtained at maturity and tubers retained and stored over winter at 3 C and 95% relative humidity for determination of stem end discoloration (SED), tuber sprouting in March, and plant growth of daughter tubers planted the following year. Application of glufosinate-ammonium resulted in slower leaf and stem desiccation at 3 and 7 DAT than did diquat. By 14 DAT leaf desiccation was the same but stem desiccation was slightly less than with diquat. Tuber SED and marketable tuber yield were no different with either desiccant. At higher rates of application, glufosinate-ammonium reduced daughter tuber sprout weight but had no effect on number of sprouts in growth room sprouting tests when compared with untreated controls. Daughter tubers from glufosinate-ammonium-treated plants planted the next growing season had markedly slower emergence and established full emergence 7 to 14 d later than diquat-desiccated tubers.

Keywords

Diquatglufosinate-ammoniumpotato, Solanum tuberosum, # SOLTUTuber sprouting testdaughter tuber replant testRusset BurbankShepody, KennebecDAE, days after emergenceDAP, days after plantingDAT, days after treatmentRH, relative humiditySED, stem end discoloration
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 505 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bowers, B., Shetty, K., Kleinkopf, G., Corsini, D., and Fuller, J. 1996. The cause and control of stem-end discoloration (SED) in Russet Burbank potatoes under Idaho potato production practices. Abstracts of the 80th Annual meeting of the Potato Association of America. Amer. Potato Journal 73:344.Google Scholar
Genstat 5 Committee. 1987. Genstat 5 Reference Manual. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gotz, W., Dorn, E., Ebert, K., Leist, H., and Kocher, H. 1983. Chemical and toxicological properties—Mode of action and metabolism of HOE-39866. Asian Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. 9th Conf., Manila. 401–404.Google Scholar
Hewson, R. T. and Black, I. A. 1991. Glufosinate-ammonium—A new herbicide and desiccant for potatoes. Proc. Brit. Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds—1991, Vol. 1. pp. 225–232.Google Scholar
Montambault, F. 1988. The use of HOE-39866 as a potato-top desiccant. . Dept. of Plant Sci., Macdonald College, McGill Univ., Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, PQ, July 1988. 139 p.Google Scholar
Rioux, R. and Freve, A. 1988. Evaluation du glufosinate pour le defanage de la pomme de terre. Phytoprotection 69: 121–125.Google Scholar
Steele, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. 481 p.Google Scholar