Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T11:19:54.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Ivyleaf Morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) to Neighboring Plants and Objects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew J. Price  and
John W. Wilcut
Andrew J. Price*
Affiliation:
National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, Agriculture Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 411 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL 36832
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
*
Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field observations of morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) showed that many plants grew out from places of comparable competitive advantage (alleys in field experiments with little or no vegetation) into neighboring plants or structures that provided climbing support. Of 223 native morningglory plants growing in rows and row middles in a 121-m2 area within established corn research plots that contained no other weeds, 68% of the mature plants climbed up corn. More significant, of the 152 climbing morningglory plants, 96% grew toward and climbed the row in its closest proximity instead of growing across the row middle. Greenhouse and field experiments were initiated to determine whether morningglory grew preferentially toward certain colored structures or corn plants. Greenhouse-grown ivyleaf morningglory displayed varying frequency in locating and climbing toward black (17%), blue (58%), red (58%), white (67%), green (75%), and yellow (75%) stakes or corn (92%). Pots containing black stakes had the fewest climbing morningglory plants. In the field study, fewer ivyleaf morningglories climbed black structures compared with white- or green-colored structures or corn. The morningglory initial planting distance from colored structures or corn was also significant in the percentage of ivyleaf morningglories that exhibited climbing growth and in its final weight; morningglories that successfully located and climbed structures or corn weighed more and produced more seed than morningglories that remained on the ground. Ivyleaf morningglory appears to respond to spatial distribution of surrounding objects and possibly uses reflectance to preferentially project its stems toward a likely prospective structure for climbing.

Keywords

Ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. IPOHEcorn, Zea mays L.Light responsemorningglory biology
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 922 - 927
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aphalo, P. J. and Ballare, C. L. 1995. On the importance of information-acquiring systems in plant-plant interactions. Funct. Ecol. 9:5–14.Google Scholar
Ballare, C. L., Scopel, A. L., Roush, M. L., and Radosevich, S. R. 1995. How plants find light in patchy canopies: a comparison between wild-type and phytochrome-B-deficient mutant plants of cucumber. Funct. Ecol. 9:859–868.Google Scholar
Benvenuti, S., Dinelli, G., Bonetti, A., and Catizone, P. 2005. Germination ecology, emergence and host detection in Cuscuta campestris . Weed Res. 45:270–278.Google Scholar
Britz, S. J. and Galston, A. W. 1983. Physiology of movements in the stems of seedling Pisum sativum L. cv Alaska. Plant Physiol. 13:313–318.Google Scholar
Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and Crowley, R. H. 1980. Influence of time of planting and distance from cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) row of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunose), prickly sida (Sida spinosa), and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) on competitiveness with cotton. Weed Sci. 28:568–840.Google Scholar
Cordes, R. C. and Bauman, T. T. 1984. Field competition between ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 32:364–370.Google Scholar
Holloway, J. C. Jr and Shaw, D. R. 1996. Herbicide effects on ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) and soybean (Glycine max) growth and water relations. Weed Sci. 44:836–841.Google Scholar
Howe, O. W. and Oliver, L. R. 1987. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) row spacing on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) interference. Weed Sci. 35:185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iino, M. 1990. Phototropism: mechanisms and ecological implications. Plant Cell Environ. 13:633–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasperbauer, M. J. 1987. Far-red light reflection from green leaves and effects on phytochrome-mediated assimilate partitioning under field conditions. Plant Physiol. 85:350–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, P. B., Wu, L. L., Brock, T. G., and Kim, D. 1995. Hormones and the orientation of growth. Pages 547–571. in Davies, P.J. ed. Plant Hormones. 2nd ed. Netherlands Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Koller, D. 1990. Light-driven leaf movements. Plant Cell Environ. 13:615–632.Google Scholar
Meloche, C. G., Knox, J. P., and Vaughn, K. C. 2007. A cortical band of gelatinous fibers causes the coiling of redvine tendrils: a model based upon cytochemical and immunocytochemical studies. Planta (Berl.) 225:485–498.Google Scholar
Minorsky, P. V. 2003. The hot and the classic. Plant Physiol. 132:1779–1780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murdock, E. C., Banks, P. A., and Toler, J. E. 1986. Shade development effects on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunose) interference with soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 34:711–717.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybeans, I: growth analysis. Weed Sci. 24:482–488.Google Scholar
Orr, G. L., Haidar, M. A., and Orr, D. A. 1996a. Smallseed dodder (Cuscuta planiflora) phototropism toward far-red when in white light. Weed Sci. 44:233–240.Google Scholar
Orr, G. L., Haidar, M. A., and Orr, D. A. 1996b. Smallseed dodder (Cuscuta planiflora) gravitropism in red light and in red plus far-red. Weed Sci. 44:795–796.Google Scholar
Parsons, A., Macleod, K., Firn, R. D., and Digby, J. 1984. Light gradients in shoots subjected to unilateral illumination-implications for phototropism. Plant Cell Environ. 7:325–332.Google Scholar
SAS 1998. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 7.00. Cary, NC SAS Institute. 1028.Google Scholar
Smith, H., Casal, J. J., and Jackson, G. M. 1990. Reflection signals and the perception by phytochrome of the proximity of neighboring vegetation. Plant Cell Environ. 13:73–78.Google Scholar
Steinitz, B., Zhangling, R., and Poff, K. L. 1985. Blue and green light-induced phototropism in Arabidopsis thaliana and Lactuca sativa L. seedlings. Plant Physiol. 77:248–251.Google Scholar
Strong, D. R. Jr. and Ray, T. S. Jr. 1975. Host tree location behavior of a tropical vine (Monstera gigantea) by skototropism. Science. 190:804–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takemiya, A., Inoue, S., Doi, M., Kinoshita, T., and Shimazaki, K. 2005. Phototropins promote plant growth in response to blue light in low light environments. Plant Cell 17:1120–1127.Google Scholar
Wood, M. L., Murray, D. S., Westerman, R. B., Verhalen, L. M., and Claypool, P. L. 1999. Full-season interference of Ipomoea hederacea with Gossypium hirsutum . Weed Sci. 47:693–696.Google Scholar
Yoshihara, T. and Iino, M. Circumnutation of rice coleoptiles: its relationship with gravitropism and absence in lazy mutants. Plant Cell Environ. 29:778–792.Google Scholar