Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:32:58.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Broccoli (Brassica oleracea) Cultivars to Post-Transplant Oxyfluorfen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark W. Farnham
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. of Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, 2875 Savannah Hwy., Charleston, SC 29414-5334
Howard F. Harrison Jr.
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. of Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, 2875 Savannah Hwy., Charleston, SC 29414-5334

Abstract

Broccoli cultivars were evaluated for differential response to oxyfluorfen applied postemergence (0.1 to 1.6 kg ai/ha) in the greenhouse and post-transplant (0.125 to 1.0 kg/ha) in a spring and a fall field study. One cultivar, ‘Green Goliath,’ was injured more by oxyfluorfen than other cultivars in all environments. ‘Pinnacle,’ was consistently less injured than others. ‘Early Dawn’ and ‘Emerald City’ were intermediate in response to oxyfluorfen. At application rates of 0.25 kg/ha or less, all cultivars recovered sufficiently from injury to produce broccoli heads of equal weight and quality as controls. Cultivars differed in their tolerance of oxyfluorfen at rates above 0.25 kg/ha. Late-maturing cultivars (i.e., Pinnacle) usually recovered from injury to yield similarly to hand-weeded plots while early-maturing cultivars were more likely to show yield losses. Broccoli cultivars possess sufficient tolerance to oxyfluorfen applied post-transplant for weed control. Appropriate choice of cultivar will enhance its utility.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Babb, M. F. 1940. Residual effects of forcing and hardening of tomato, cabbage, and cauliflower plants. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 760. 35 p.Google Scholar
2. Bhowmik, P. C. and McGlew, E. N. 1986. Effects of oxyfluorfen as a pretransplant treatment on weed control and cabbage yield. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 111:686689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Cook, W. P. and Ezell, D. O. 1983. Commercial broccoli production in South Carolina. Clemson Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv. Hortic. Lflt. 52. 7 p.Google Scholar
4. Gorske, S. F. and Hopen, H. J. 1978. Selectivity of nitrofen and oxyfluorfen between Portulaca oleracea ecotypes and two cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) cultivars. Weed Sci. 26:640642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Grabowski, J. M. and Hopen, H. J. 1984. Evaluation of oxyfluorfen formulations for cabbage weed control. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 109:539543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Herbst, K. A. and Derr, J. F. 1990. Effects of oxyfluorfen, pyridate, and BAS 514 applied postemergence on direct-seeded broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis). Weed Technol. 4:7175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Herbst, K. A. and Derr, J. F. 1990. Direct-seeded broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) response to oxyfluorfen and BAS 514 applied preemergence. Weed Technol. 4:356359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Johnson, D. H., McCarty, J. T., Carey, V. F., and Talbert, R. E. 1992. Broccoli, cabbage, and cauliflower herbicides evaluated. Arkansas Farm Res. 41:1213.Google Scholar
9. Pereira, J. F., Splittstoesser, W. E., and Hopen, H. J. 1971. Mechanism of intraspecific selectivity of cabbage to nitrofen. Weed Sci. 19:647651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar