Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:36:42.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resistance of Wild Carrot (Daucus carota) to 2,4-D in Michigan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jeff M. Stachler ,
James J. Kells  and
Donald Penner
Jeff M. Stachler*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
James J. Kells
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Differential response of wild carrot to 2,4-D was found in seeds collected from 10 locations in Michigan, three in Ohio, one in Illinois, and one in Ontario, Canada. Greenhouse studies were conducted on plants grown from the collected seeds to confirm resistance of wild carrot to 2,4-D, and to study variations among and within populations. The differential response of wild carrot to 2,4-D in field research was due to resistant individuals. Among the 14 locations, wild carrot control with 2,4-D ranged from 18 to 91%. Wild carrot varied in its response to 2,4-D among and within populations as well as within individual umbels. In 69% of the tested samples, at least one wild carrot plant was resistant to 2,4-D.

Keywords

2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic acidwild carrot, Daucus carota L. #3 DAUCAHerbicide resistancedifferential responsegrowth regulatorDATdays after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 734 - 739
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., Cowett, E. R. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds in North America. In LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 9–30.Google Scholar
Bell, A. R., Nalewaja, J. D., Schooler, A. B. 1972. Response of kochia selections to 2,4-D, dicamba, and picloram. Weed Sci. 20: 458–462.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C. 1996. The history of 2,4-D and its impact on development of the discipline of weed science in the United States. In Burnside, O. C., ed. Biologic and Economic Assessment of Benefits from Use of Phenoxy Herbicides in the United States. NAPIAP Report Number 1-PA-96. Washington, DC: USDA. pp. 5–15.Google Scholar
Coupland, D. 1994. Resistance to the auxin analog herbicides. In Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis. pp. 171–214.Google Scholar
Dunham, R. S. 1952. Annual, winter annual and biennial grassy and broadleaved weeds. NCWCC Res. Report 9: 45–49.Google Scholar
Hay, J. R. and Ouellette, G. J. 1959. The role of fertilizer and 2,4-D in the control of pasture weeds. Can. J. Plant Sci. 39: 278–283.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. and Morrison, I. N. 1992. Resistance to auxin-type herbicides in wild mustard (Sinapsis arvensis L.) populations in western Canada. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 32:164.Google Scholar
Heywood, V. H. 1968. Daucus . In Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., and Burges, N. A., eds. Flora Europaea. Volume 2. University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 373–375.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. M. 1964. Variations in ecotypes of Canada thistle. Weeds 12: 167–171.Google Scholar
Hume, L. 1988. Long-term effects of 2,4-D application on plants. II. Herbicide avoidance by Chenopodium album and Thlaspi arvense . Can. J. Bot. 66: 230–235.Google Scholar
Koul, P. A., Koul, A. K., and Hamal, I. A. 1989. Reproductive biology of wild and cultivated carrot (Daucus carota L.). New Phytol. 112: 437–443.Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., Dial, M. J., and Zemetra, R. S. 1990. Inheritance of sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in Lactuca spp. Weed Technol. 4: 787–790.Google Scholar
Manthey, F. A., Nalewaja, J. D., and Messersmith, C. G. 1995. North Dakota has kochia (Kochia scoparia L.) biotypes that are resistant to dicamba, 2,4-D, and tribenuron. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 35:259.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. 1997. Herbicide resistance in North America: history, circumstances of development and current situation. In DePrado, R., Jorrin, J., and Garcia-Torres, L., eds. Weed and Crop Resistance to Herbicides. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. pp. 29–38.Google Scholar
Small, E. 1978. A numerical taxonomic analysis of the Daucus carota complex. Can. J. Bot. 56: 248–276.Google Scholar
Stachler, J. M. and Kells, J. J. 1995. Differential response of wild carrot (Daucus carota L.) to 2,4-D. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 35:134.Google Scholar
Stachler, J. M. and Kells, J. J. 1997. Wild carrot (Daucus carota) control in no-tillage cropping systems. Weed Technol. 11: 444–452.Google Scholar
St. Pierre, M. D., Bayer, R. J., and Weis, I. M. 1990. An isozyme-based assessment of the genetic variability within the Daucus carota complex (Apiaceae: Caucallideae). Can. J. Bot. 68: 2449–2457.Google Scholar
Switzer, C. M. 1957. The existence of 2,4-D-resistant strains of wild carrot. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 11: 315–318.Google Scholar
Whitehead, C. W. and Switzer, C. M. 1963. The differential response of strains of wild carrot to 2,4-D and related herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci. 43: 255–262.Google Scholar
Whitworth, J. W. 1964. The reaction of strains of field bindweed to 2,4-D. Weeds 12: 57–58.Google Scholar
Whitworth, J. W. and Muzik, T. J. 1967. Differential response of selected clones of bindweed to 2,4-D. Weeds 15: 275–280.Google Scholar