Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:42:21.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resistance of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to the Dinitroaniline Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Billy J. Gossett ,
Edward C. Murdock  and
Joe E. Toler
Billy J. Gossett
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634-0359
Edward C. Murdock
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634-0359
Joe E. Toler
Affiliation:
Clemson Univ., Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634-0359
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trifluralin-resistant Palmer amaranth populations were confirmed at eight locations within two of the ten-county cotton growing region of South Carolina. Different levels of resistance to six dinitroaniline herbicides were observed, but no resistance was observed to herbicides from nine other chemical groups. Five to six times more trifluralin was required to control a resistant than a susceptible biotype under field conditions.

Keywords

trifluralin, 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenaminecotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats ♯ AMAPAWeed resistanceweed biotypestrifluralinAMAPA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 1992 , pp. 587 - 591
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Buchanan, G. A. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. II. Cocklebur and redroot pigweed. Weed Sci. 19:580–582.Google Scholar
2. Buchanan, G. A. 1974. Weeds plague cotton growers from the Carolinas to California. Weeds Today. 5:6–20.Google Scholar
3. Elmore, C. D. 1985. Weed identification guide. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 3 AMAPA.Google Scholar
4. Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1982. Interrelating factors controlling the rate of appearance of resistance: the outlook for the future. p. 325–347 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
5. Haigler, W. E., Gossett, B. J., Harris, J. R., and Toler, J. E. 1988. Resistance of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) to the organic arsenical herbicides. Weed Sci. 36:24–27.Google Scholar
6. Heap, I. and Knight, R. 1986. The occurrence of herbicide cross-resistance in a population of annual ryegrass, Lolium rigidum, resistant to diclofop-methyl. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 37:149–156.Google Scholar
7. Morrison, I. N., Todd, B. G., and Nawolsky, K. M. 1989. Confirmation of trifluralin-resistant green foxtail (Setaria viridis) in Manitoba. Weed Technol. 3:544–551.Google Scholar
8. Mudge, L. C., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Resistance of goosegrass (Eleusine indica) to dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 32: 591–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Murdock, E. C. 1992. Documentation of weed infestations in South Carolina. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf.—Cotton Weed Sci. Res. Conf. 16:1296.Google Scholar
10. Vaughn, K. C., Vaughn, M. A., and Gossett, B. J. 1990. A biotype of goosegrass (Eleusine indica) with an intermediate level of dinitroaniline herbicide resistance. Weed Technol. 4:157–162.Google Scholar
11. Whitwell, T. and Higgins, J. H. 1985. Report of 1984 cotton weed loss committee. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf.—Cotton Weed Sci. Res. Conf. 9:206–211.Google Scholar