Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:31:56.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Purple Nutsedge Control and Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Tolerance to Sulfentrazone and Halosulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

W. James Grichar*
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Yoakum, TX 77995
B. A. Besler
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Yoakum, TX 77995
Kevin D. Brewer
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Yoakum, TX 77995
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Five field studies on sandy soils with ≤ 1% organic matter in south Texas showed that halosulfuron at 0.066 kg/ha preemergence (PRE) controlled ≥ 92% purple nutsedge and at 0.066 kg/ha postemergence (POST) controlled purple nutsedge 77 to 95%. Sulfentrazone at 0.11 to 0.28 kg/ha PRE or POST controlled purple nutsedge < 65% at one location but > 75% at two other locations. Poor control at the one location may have been due to a lack of early-season rainfall or irrigation. Potatoes were stunted 5 to 26% with halosulfuron PRE, whereas POST treatments caused 7 to 40% stunting. Sulfentrazone at 0.11 to 0.28 kg/ha applied PRE or POST caused 2 to 38% stunting. ‘Atlantic’ potato stunting with sulfentrazone POST at 0.14 to 0.28 kg/ha was ≥ 20%, whereas ‘Snowden’ and ‘1625’ potatoes were stunted ≤ 20%. Potato yields were reduced 65 and 39% with sulfentrazone and halosulfuron POST, respectively, at the high rates, but yield reductions occurred with all POST treatments on Atlantic potatoes 10- to 20-cm tall. Halosulfuron PRE at 0.033 kg/ha and sulfentrazone PRE at 0.14 kg/ha did not reduce yields; however, all other treatments of halosulfuron and sulfentrazone reduced potato yields.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1996. Efficacy of rimsulfuron and metribuzin in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 10:475480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Ali, F. A., Shamsi, S. R. A., and Hussain, S. M. 1978. Sprouting and growth of purple nutsedge in relation to pH and aeration. Physiologia-Plantarum 44:373376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. 1991. United States Standards for Grades of Potatoes F R Doc. 91-4371. Washington, DC. 7 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1995. Authority® Technical Bulletin. Philadelphia, PA: FMC Corporation Agricultural Products Group. 4 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002. Dual Product Label. Greensboro, NC: Syngenta. Pp. 208306.Google Scholar
Bailey, W. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2002. Response of potato (Solanum tubersum) and selected weeds to sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 16:651658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. I., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1987. Sulfonylureas. in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Volume 3. New York: Marcel Dekker. Pp. 117189.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Lynch, D. R., and Entz, T. 1995. Postemergence broadleaf weed control in potato (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron and HOE-075032. Weed Technol. 9:228235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, J. W. 1994. Nutsedge suppression in bermudagrass turf. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:75.Google Scholar
Bruff, S. A. and Hancock, H. G. 1995. Sulfentrazone: a promising new herbicide for tobacco. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:10.Google Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Weete, J. D., Duke, S. O., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar differences in response to sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 45:634641.Google Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Weete, J. D., and Hancock, H. G. 1996. Physiological basis for differential sensitivity to sulfentrazone by sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis). Weed Sci. 44:1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotray, P. A., Baughman, T. A., Keeling, J. W., Grichar, W. J., and Lemon, R. G. 2001. Effect of imazapic application timing on Texas peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 15:2629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1999. Weed survey—southern states—vegetable subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:281282.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G. R., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Sulfentrazone adsorption and mobility as affected by soil and pH. Weed Sci. 45:733738.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J., Colburn, A. E., and Baughman, P. A. 1996. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) as influenced by method of metolachlor application. Weed Technol. 10:278281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, W. J., Lemon, R. G., Brewer, K. D., and Minton, B. W. 2001. S-metolachlor compared with metolachlor on yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 15:107111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, W. J. and Nester, P. R. 1997. Nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with AC 263,222 and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 11:714719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulting, A. G., Wax, L. M., and Simmons, F. W. 1997. Tolerance levels of soybean cultivars to sulfentrazone. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:37.Google Scholar
Hurt, T. R. and Vencill, W. K. 1994. Phytotoxicity and nutsedge control in woody and herbaceous ornamentals with Manage (MON-12037). J. Environ. Hortic. 12:135137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazarian, D. E., Nissen, S. J., and Thompson, A. L. 2000. Sulfentrazone and flumioxazin for broadleaf control in potatoes. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 53:76.Google Scholar
Li, Z., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G., and Hancock, H. G. 1999. Use of seedling growth parameters to classify soybean (Glycine max) cultivar sensitivity to sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 13:530535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matringe, M., Camadro, J. M., Labbe, P., and Scalla, R. 1989. Protoporphyrinogen oxidase as a molecular target for diphenyl ether herbicides. Biochem. J. 260:231235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyahoza, F. 1973. Studies of the biology of Cyperus rotundus L.; early growth and vegetative reproduction. East Afr. Agric. J. 39:120129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, D., Swantek, J., and Castillo, T. 1997. Soybean cultivar susceptibility to sulfentrazone. Volume I. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Crop Protection Association, Abstracts from the Research Conference.Google Scholar
Peters, T. J., Flint, J. L., Millen, K. J., Spankle, P. L., and Travers, J. N. 1993. MON 12000: a new herbicide for yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) control in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 33:8.Google Scholar
Renner, K. A. and Powell, G. E. 1998. Weed control in potato (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron and metribuzin. Weed Technol. 12:406409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. K., Monks, D. W., and Monaco, T. J. 1996. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) tolerance and susceptibility of eight weeds to rimsulfuron with and without metribuzin. Weed Technol. 10:2934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherrick, S. L., Burkhalter, A. P., Cuarezmo, J. A., and Mason, J. F. 1993. MON 12000: a new herbicide for control of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) in turfgrass. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:75.Google Scholar
Taylor-Lovell, S., Wax, L. M., and Nelson, R. 2001. Phytotoxic response and yield of soybean (Glycine max) varieties treated with sulfentrazone or flumioxazin. Weed Technol. 15:95102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vencill, W. K., Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Hawf, L. R. 1995. Effect of MON-2037 on purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow (Cyperus esculentus) nutsedge. Weed Technol. 9:148152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. L., Jordan, D. L., and Reynolds, D. B. 1996. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 10:762765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, L. S. Jr. and Coble, H. D. 1999. Managing purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) populations utilizing herbicide strategies and crop rotation sequences. Weed Technol. 13:494503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M. and Coble, H. D. 1997. Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995. Weed Technol. 11:308317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehtje, G. R., Walker, R. W., Grey, T. L., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Response of purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) to selective placement of sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 45:382387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, R. E. 1988. Carbamothiates. in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Volume 3. New York: Marcel Dekker. Pp. 245300.Google Scholar
Wills, G. D. 1977. Nutsedge deals misery to cotton growers. Weeds Today 9:1617.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. E., Nissen, S. J., and Thompson, A. 2002. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) variety and weed response to sulfentrazone and flumioxazin. Weed Technol. 16:567574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witkowski, D. A. and Halling, B. P. 1989. Inhibition of plant protoporphyrinogen oxidase by the herbicide acifluorfen-methyl. Plant Physiol. 90:12391242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed