Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:12:39.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postemergence Weed Control with CGA-277476 and Cloransulam-Methyl in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kelly A. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
Karen A. Renner
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325

Abstract

Field and greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate postemergence (POST) soybean injury and weed control with CGA-277476 and cloransulam-methyl alone and in tank mixtures. In the field, visible soybean injury was 12 to 14% from CGA-277476 and 9 to 13% from cloransulam-methyl 7 d after treatment. Tank mixtures of either herbicide with acifluorfen or acifluorfen plus thifensulfuron were more injurious than CGA-277476 or cloransulam-methyl applied alone. Both CGA-277476 and cloransulam-methyl reduced velvetleaf dry weight 82%, and cloransulam-methyl reduced common ragweed dry weight 92%. Neither herbicide adequately controlled common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, nor eastern black nightshade. The addition of acifluorfen to the spray solution improved common ragweed, common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, and eastern black nightshade control with CGA-277476 and improved common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, and eastern black nightshade control with cloransulam-methyl. Tank mixing thifensulfuron with CGA-277476 or cloransulam-methyl increased common lambsquarters and redroot pigweed control. In the greenhouse, CGA-277476 at 20 g ai/ha reduced velvetleaf dry weight 98%, and 79 g/ha was required to reduce common ragweed dry weight 93%. Cloransulam-methyl at 4.4 g ai/ha reduced velvetleaf dry weight 98% and common ragweed dry weight 94% at 8.8 g/ha. Chlorimuron reduced yellow nutsedge dry weight more than CGA-277476 or cloransulam-methyl. Antagonism of POST graminicide activity by CGA-277476 was grass species and graminicide related. CGA-277476 reduced giant foxtail control by clethodim but not by quizalofop. Cloransulam-methyl tank mixed with clethodim or quizalofop controlled giant foxtail.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1995. CGA-277476 herbicide. Technical information bulletin. Greensboro, NC: Ciba Crop Protection. 4 p.Google Scholar
Bauer, T. A., Pruss, S. W., Dill, T. R., and Kidder, D. 1996. Sequential soybean herbicide programs including CGA-277476. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:131132.Google Scholar
Bauer, T., Threewitt, T., Stahlberg, L., Moses, A., Jones, K., Kidder, D., and Porpiglia, P. 1995. Weed management programs in soybeans with CGA-277476. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:140.Google Scholar
Bjelk, L. A. and Monaco, T. J. 1992. Effect of chlorimuron and quizalofop on fatty acid biosynthesis. Weed Sci. 40:16.Google Scholar
Brooks, R. L., Porpiglia, P. J., Peek, J. W., Meyer, W., Gutbrod, K., and Gut, H. 1995. CGA-277476, a new postemergence herbicide for soybeans. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 35:8.Google Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:2022.Google Scholar
Croon, K. A. and Merkle, M. G. 1988. Effects of bentazon, imazaquin, or chlorimuron on haloxyfop or fluazifop-P efficacy. Weed Technol. 2:3640.Google Scholar
Ditmarsen, S. C., Dorich, R. A., Rowland, L. B., and Schultz, M. E. 1997. Efficacy and antagonism of tank mixtures of cloransulam-methyl with postemergence graminicides in soybeans. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:3.Google Scholar
Ferreira, K. L., Burton, J. D., and Coble, H. D. 1995. Physiological basis for antagonism of fluazifop-P by DPX-PE350. Weed Sci. 43:184191.Google Scholar
Ferreira, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1994. Effect of DPX-PE350 on the efficacy of graminicides. Weed Sci. 42:222226.Google Scholar
Gerwick, B. C., Thompson, P., and Noveroske, R. 1988. Potential mechanisms in antagonism with aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 28:100.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. 1991. Maximizing herbicide efficiency with mixtures and expert systems. Weed Technol. 5:894897.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:163.Google Scholar
Jachetta, J. J., Van Heertum, J. C., and Gerwick, B. C. 1995. Cloransulammethyl: a new herbicide for soybeans. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 35:8.Google Scholar
Jeffers, D. L. 1987. Development and growth. In Beuerlein, J., Jeffers, D. L., and Eckert, D., eds. The Soybean in Ohio. Columbus, OH: Ohio Cooperative Extension Service Publ. 741. 128 p.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993. Interactions of DPX-PE350 with fluazifop-P, sethoxydim, clethodim, and quizalofop-P. Weed Technol. 7:605610.Google Scholar
Kidder, D. and Johnson, M. D. 1997. Grass control in soybeans with CGA-277476; alone, in sequential, and in tankmix programs. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:1.Google Scholar
Kidder, D. W. and Porpiglia, P. J. 1996. CGA-277476 and CGA-248757 for broad spectrum, postemergence weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 36:12.Google Scholar
Menbere, H. and Ritter, R. L. 1997. Use of cloransulam-methyl in soybeans. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:2.Google Scholar
Monks, C. D., Wilcut, J. W., and Richburg, J. S. III. 1993. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with chlorimuron plus acifluorfen or thifensulfuron mixtures. Weed Technol. 7:317321.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R. and Gander, J. R. 1997. Morningglory spectrum for cloransulam (FirstRate). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:2.Google Scholar
Putnam, A. R. and Penner, D. 1974. Pesticide interactions in higher plants. Residue Rev. 50:73110.Google Scholar
Ritter, R. L. and Menbere, H. 1997. Use of CGA-277476 in soybeans. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:1.Google Scholar
Sander, K. W., Dill, T. R., Kidder, D. W., and Porpiglia, P. J. 1995. Update on the herbicidal activity of CGA-277476 and CGA-248757 in soybeans in the midwest. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:139140.Google Scholar
Schultz, M. E., Grant, D. L., Langston, V. B., and Dorich, R. A. 1995. Cloransulam-methyl performance when applied postemergence in U.S. soybeans. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 36:13.Google Scholar
Simpson, D. M. and Stoller, E. W. 1996. Thifensulfuron and imazethapyr interaction at the ALS enzyme in sulfonylurea-tolerant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 44:763768.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. G., Velovitch, J. J., Haack, A., and Dorich, R. A. 1995. Tankmix alternatives with cloransulam-methyl for postemergence control of common lambsquarters and pigweed species. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:124.Google Scholar
Wesley, M. T. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Interactions of diphenyl ether herbicides with chlorimuron and imazaquin. Weed Technol. 6:345351.Google Scholar
Young, B. G., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1996. Interactions of sethoxydim and corn (Zea mays) broadleaf herbicides on three annual grasses. Weed Technol. 10:914922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar