Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T20:20:28.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postemergence Weed Control in Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with Rimsulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Charlotte V. Eberlein
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
James C. Whitmore
Affiliation:
Tetonia Res. and Ext. Cent., Newdale, ID 83436
Charles E. Stanger
Affiliation:
Oregon State Univ., Malheur Exp. Stn., Ontario, OR 97914
Mary J. Guttieri
Affiliation:
Univ. Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210

Abstract

Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to examine weed control with, and potato tolerance to, rimsulfuron or rimsulfuron + metribuzin applied POST. In greenhouse trials, hairy nightshade control with rimsulfuron applied POST at 9 to 35 g/ha was ≥ 90%, but cutleaf nightshade control was < 30%. In field studies, rimsulfuron at 18 to 35 g/ha provided ≥ 85% control of hairy nightshade, redroot pigweed, tumble pigweed, and shepherd's-purse; 75 to 82% control of volunteer oats; and 25 to 87% control of common lambsquarters. Common lambsquarters control was increased to 92 to 100% when rimsulfuron at 18 to 35 g/ha was applied in combination with metribuzin at 280 g/ha. Hairy nightshade and redroot pigweed control usually were not improved by adding metribuzin to the rimsulfuron spray mixture and tumble pigweed and shepherd's-purse control were improved only slightly. Volunteer oat control with rimsulfuron sometimes was antagonized by the addition of metribuzin to the spray mixture. In weed-free trials, yield of potatoes grown for the fresh market or to produce seed tubers was not reduced by rimsulfuron at rates as high as 70 g/ha.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Callihan, R. H. and Bellinder, R. R. 1993. Management of Weeds. p. 95102 in Rowe, R. C., ed. Potato Health Management. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
2. Dallyn, S. L. 1971. Weed control methods in potatoes. Am. Potato J. 48:116128.Google Scholar
3. Eberlein, C. V., Barkdoll, A. W., and Davis, J. R. 1991. Pathogenicity of Colletotrichum coccodes isolates to potato (Solanum tuberosum) and two nightshade (Solanum spp.) species. Weed Technol. 5:570574.Google Scholar
4. Eberlein, C. V., Al-Khatib, K., Guttieri, M. J., and Fuerst, E. P. 1992. Distribution and characteristics of triazine resistant Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii) in Idaho. Weed Sci. 40:507512.Google Scholar
5. Haderlie, L. C. and Poulson, M. 1991. 1990 Weed control survey. Proc. Univ. of Idaho Winter Commodity Schools 23:149154.Google Scholar
6. Ogg, A. G. 1977. Responses of potatoes and weeds to herbicides. Washington State Univ. Coll. Agric. Res. Cent. Bull. 844. 10 p.Google Scholar
7. Ogg, A. G. and Rogers, B. S. 1989. Taxonomy, distribution, biology, and control of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States and Canada. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:2558.Google Scholar
8. Wright, J. L., Mallory-Smith, C. A., Fay, P. K., Thill, D. C., Westra, P., and Trunkle, P. A. 1993. The frequency of sulfonylurea herbicide resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia L. Schrad) in Colorado, Idaho, and Montana. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 46:7576.Google Scholar