Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:13:08.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postemergence Chemical Control of Nodding Broomrape (Orobanche cernua) in Bidi Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Grama N. Dhanapal ,
Siny J. Ter Borg  and
Paul C. Struik
Grama N. Dhanapal
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Agricultural Sciences, Gandhi Krishi Vignana Kendra, Bangalore—560 065, Karnataka, India
Siny J. Ter Borg
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, group Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology, Wageningen Agricultural University, Bornsesteeg 69, 6708 PD Wageningen, The Netherlands
Paul C. Struik
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agronomy, Wageningen Agricultural University, Haarweg 333, 6709 RZ Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Broomrape is a severe problem in the continuous cropping of bidi tobacco in India. Fifteen herbicides were evaluated for postemergence control, at different dates and rates, in field experiments in Nipani, Karnataka State. The effects of the herbicides on Orobanche control and growth and yield of tobacco were compared to the effects of handweeding and an untreated check. Following this screening experiment, four herbicides were selected for further testing. Glyphosate at 500 g ai/ha applied at 60 days after transplanting (DAT) and imazaquin at 10 g ai/ha applied at 30 DAT reduced the number of aboveground broomrape spikes by 75 to 80% and increased the tobacco yields by 80 to > 100% compared to the untreated plots. Imazethapyr and EPTC were found to be less effective for broomrape control, but they still led to substantially higher tobacco yield. None of the herbicide treatments resulted in yields higher than those in the hand-weeded plots. These plots probably did not yet reflect the potential yield of tobacco under broomrape-free conditions, due to nonemerged spikes. Toxicity to tobacco of all herbicides was higher for the higher rates tested. It was lowest with imazaquin.

Keywords

Glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycineimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidEPTC, S-ethyl dipropyl carbamothioatenodding broomrape, Orobanche cernua Loefl. var. cernua # ORACEtobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L.Handweedingparasitic weedsEPTCglyphosateimazaquinimazethapyrORACEDAT, days after transplanting
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 652 - 659
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Dhanapal, G. N., Struik, P. C., Udayakumar, M., and Timmermans, P.C.J.M. 1996. Management of broomrape (Orobanche spp.)—a review. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 175:335–359.Google Scholar
Foy, C. L., Jain, R., and Jacobsohn, R. 1989. Recent approaches for chemical control of broomrape (Orobanche spp.). Rev. Weed Sci. 4:123–152.Google Scholar
García-Torres, L. 1994. Progress in Orobanche control, an overview. In Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Biology and Management of Orobanche. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute. pp. 390–399.Google Scholar
García-Torres, L., Castejón-Muñoz, M., López-Granados, F., and Jurado-Expósito, M. 1995. Imazapyr applied postemergence in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) for broomrape (Orobanche cernua) control. Weed Technol. 9:819–824.Google Scholar
García-Torres, L. and López-Granados, F. 1991. Control of broomrape (Orobanche crenata Forsk.) in broad bean (Vicia faba L.) with imidazolinones and other herbicides. Weed Res. 31:227–235.Google Scholar
García-Torres, L., López-Granados, F., and Castejón-Muñoz, M. 1994. Preemergence herbicides for the control of broomrape (Orobanche cernua Loefl.) in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Weed Res. 34:395–402.Google Scholar
Kogan, M. and Ureta, C. 1996. Efficacy and selectivity of glyphosate controlling Orobanche cernua in Virginia tobacco. In Moreno, M. T., Cubero, J. I., Berner, D., Joel, D., Musselman, L. J., and Parker, C., eds. Advances in Parasitic Plant Research. Sevilla, Spain: Junta de Andalucia, Consejeria de Agricultura y Pesca. pp. 747–754.Google Scholar
Krishnamurty, G.V.G. 1994. Orobanche problem and management in India. In Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Biology and Management of Orobanche. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute. pp. 591–598.Google Scholar
Krishnamurty, G.V.G., Chari, M. S., and Nagarajan, K. 1994. Broomrape (Orobanche cernua Loefl.) on tobacco. Rajahmundry, India: Central Tobacco Research Institute. 35 p.Google Scholar
Lolas, P. C. 1986. Control of broomrape (Orobanche ramosa) in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Weed Sci. 34:427–430.Google Scholar
Lolas, P. C. 1994. Herbicides for control of broomrape (Orobanche ramosa L.) in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Weed Res. 34:205–209.Google Scholar
Mazaheri, A., Vaziri, M., and Moayed-Zadeh, N. 1991. Studies on the chemical control of broomrape (Orobanche aegyptiaca Pers.) in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) fields. In Ransom, J. K., Musselman, L. J., Worsham, A. D., and Parker, C., eds. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Parasitic Weeds. Nairobi, Kenya: CIMMYT. pp. 90–92.Google Scholar
Nemli, Y., Emiroglu, Ü., and Küçüközden, R. 1991. Chemical control of broomrape (Orobanche ramosa L.) in tobacco. In Wegmann, K. and Musselman, L. J., eds. Progress in Orobanche Research. Tubingen, Germany: Eberhard-Karls-Universität. pp. 191–199.Google Scholar
Panse, V. G. and Sukhatme, P. V. 1967. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research. pp. 199–211.Google Scholar
Parker, C. 1994. The present state of the Orobanche problem. In Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Biology and Management of Orobanche. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute. pp. 17–26.Google Scholar
Parker, C. and Riches, C. R. 1993. Parasitic Weeds of the World: Biology and Control. Wallingford, Great Britain: CAB International. 332 p.Google Scholar
Raju, C. A. 1996. Studies on chemical control of Orobanche cernua in tobacco fields. In Moreno, M. T., Cubero, J. I., Berner, D., Joel, D., Musselman, L. J., and Parker, C., eds. Advances in Parasitic Plant Research. Sevilla, Spain: Junta de Andalucia, Consejeria de Agricultura y Pesca. pp. 739–746.Google Scholar
Saber, H. A., El-Hady, M., Khalil, S. A., El-Sherbeeny, M. H., and Hassan, M. W. 1994. New herbicides for Orobanche control in faba bean in Egypt. In Pieterse, A. H., Verkleij, J.A.C., and ter Borg, S. J., eds. Biology and Management of Orobanche. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Orobanche and Related Striga Research. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute. pp. 572–575.Google Scholar
Sauerborn, J., Saxena, M. C., and Meyer, A. 1989. Broomrape control in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) with glyphosate and imazaquin. Weed Res. 29:97–102.Google Scholar
Vasilakakis, C. B., Vezirtjoglou, R. M., and Hadzistavros, C. S. 1988. The effect of polydynamic agrochemicals on the broomrape (Orobanche ramosa L.) of tobacco in the field. Bull. Inf. CORESTA 8:146–147.Google Scholar