Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:29:15.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planting Date, Mulch, and Herbicide Rate Effects on the Growth, Yield, and Physicochemical Properties of Menthol Mint (Mentha Arvensis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Manoj K. Singh  and
Swaran S. Saini
Manoj K. Singh*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab)—141 004, India
Swaran S. Saini
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (Punjab)—141 004, India
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 2001 and 2002 to study the effect of date of planting, herbicide, and straw mulch on menthol mint yield and oil quality in northwest India. Menthol mint was planted at three dates (December 10, December 30, and January 20). Diuron was applied prior to emergence at rates of 0.0, 0.4, and 0.6 kg ai/ha, with and without rice straw mulch (6 t/ha). Menthol mint planted on December 30 and January 20 produced more plantlets and dry matter than the December 10 planting. Menthol mint planted on December 10 had higher weed density and weed biomass, and lower menthol mint herbage and oil yield than the later planting dates. Straw mulch application reduced weed density and weed biomass, and increased plantlet population, menthol mint dry matter accumulation, fresh herbage, and menthol mint oil yield. Preemergence (PRE) applications of diuron at 0.4 and 0.6 kg ai/ha increased menthol mint population and crop dry matter accumulation, and decreased weed density and weed biomass compared to the weedy check. Diuron at 0.6 kg/ha increased fresh herbage and menthol mint oil yield over the untreated weedy check, but there were no other differences between the two rates of diuron. Physicochemical properties of menthol mint oil were not affected by any of the three tested factors.

Keywords

Diuronmenthol mint, Mentha arvensis L.Chemical weed controlintegrated weed controlJapanese mintoil qualityweed management
Type
Weed Management—Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 691 - 698
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Brar, L. S., Walia, S. S., and Walia, U. S. 2000. Bio-efficacy of herbicides against weeds and Japanese mint (Mentha arvensis L.). Indian J. Weed Sci 32:72–79.Google Scholar
Clevenger, J. P. 1928. Content of essential oil in plants. American Perfumer 23:467.Google Scholar
Dyck, E. and Leibman, M. 1994. Soil fertility management as a factor in weed control, the effect of crimson clover residue, synthetic nitrogen fertilizer and their interactions on emergence and early growth of lambsquarters and sweet corn. Plant Soil 167:227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd ed. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons. 680.Google Scholar
Hallgren, E., Palmere, M. W., and Milberg, P. 1999. Data dividing with cross-validation: an investigation of broad-scale gradients in Swedish weed communities. J. Ecol 87:1037–1051.Google Scholar
[ISI] Indian Standards Institution 1968. Methods of Sampling and Test for Natural and Synthetic Perfumery Materials. IS,326 First Revision. Indian Standards Institution. New Delhi: Manak Bhawan. 58.Google Scholar
Kaur, M. 1999. Studies on weed management in peppermint (Mentha piperita L.). . Ludhiana, India: Punjab Agricultural University. 82.Google Scholar
Kumar, S., Bahl, J. R., Bansal, R. P., Kukreja, A. K., Garg, S. N., Naqvi, A. A., Luthra, R., and Sharma, S. 2000. Profits of Indian menthol mint Mentha arvensis cultivars at different stages of crop growth in northern plains. J. Med. Arom. Pl. Sci 22:774–786.Google Scholar
Kumar, K., Walia, U. S., and Brar, L. S. 2001. Bio Efficacy of Herbicides in Mentha arvensis and Mentha piperita . Indian J. Weed Sci 33:22–25.Google Scholar
Lal, R. 1974. Soil temperature, soil moisture and maize yield from mulched and unmulched tropical soils. Plant Soil 40:129–143.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. and Davis, A. S. 2000. Integration of soil, crop, and weed management in low external input farming systems. Weed Res 40:27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahal, G. S. 1991. Effect of time of sowing and stage of harvesting on the herb and oil yield of spearmint (Mentha spicata). . Ludhiana, India: Punjab Agricultural University. 76.Google Scholar
Milberg, P., Hallgren, E., and Palmere, M. W. 2001. Timing of disturbance and vegetation development: how sowing date affects the weed flora in spring-sown crops. J. Veget. Sci 12:93–98.Google Scholar
Patra, D. D., Muni, R., Singh, D. V., and Ram, M. 1993. Influence of straw mulching on fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency, moisture conservation and herb and essential oil yield in Japanese mint (Mentha arvensis). Fert Res 34:135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, S. and Saxena, M. C. 1980. Effect of date of planting and row spacing on the growth and development of peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) in Tarai. Indian J. Plant Physiol 23:119–126.Google Scholar
Ram, D., Ram, M., and Singh, R. 2006. Optimization of water and nitrogen application to menthol mint (Mentha arvensis L.) through sugarcane trash mulch in a sandy loam soil of semi-arid subtropical climate. Bioresource Technol 97:886–893.Google Scholar
Ram, M., Ram, D., Singh, S., Roy, S. K., and Kumar, S. 2001. Effect of planting time on the growth and essential oil yield in different varieties of menthol mint Mentha arvensis. I. J. Med. Arom. Pl. Sci 22–23/4A–1A:400–403.Google Scholar
Reader, R. J. 1991. Control of seedling emergence by ground cover a potential mechanism involving seed predation. Can. J. Bot 69:2084–2087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saha, B. N., Baruah, A. K. S., and Baruah, B. C. 1999. Effect of planting date and spacing on yield and herb and essential oil of Mentha piperita . Indian J. Agron 44:851–856.Google Scholar
Seibert, A. C. and Pearce, R. B. 1993. Growth analysis of weed and crop species with reference to seed weight. Weed Sci 41:52–56.Google Scholar
Singh, P., Brar, L. S., and Randhawa, G. S. 1995. Efficacy of different herbicides for weed control in Japanese mint (Mentha arvensis L.). Indian Perfumer 39:72–75.Google Scholar
Skrubis, B. 1971. Effect of weed control on the yield of herb and the yield and oil composition of Mentha piperita L. Flavour Ind 2:367–369.Google Scholar
Srivastava, R. K., Singh, A. K., Kalra, A., Tomar, V. K. S., Bansal, R. P., Patra, D. D., Chand, S., Naqvi, A. A., Sharma, S., and Kumar, S. 2002. Characteristics of menthol mint Mentha arvensis cultivated on industrial scale in the Indo-Gangetic plains. Ind. Crops Prod 15:89–198.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. 1993. Interaction of light, soil moisture, and temperature with weed suppression by hairy vetch residue. Weed Sci 41:46–51.Google Scholar
Walker, J. M. 1969. One degree increments in soil temperature affect maize seedlings behaviour. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am 33:729–736.Google Scholar
Weston, L. A. 1996. Utilization of allelopathy for weed management in agro-ecosystems. Agron. J. 88:860–866.Google Scholar
Zheljazkov, V., Yankov, B., and Topalov, V. 1996. Effect of mechanical and chemical weed control on the growth, development and productivity of M. piperita and M. arvensis var. piperascens grown for planting material. J. Essent. Oil Res 8:171–176.Google Scholar