Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:29:27.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phytotoxicity of Chlorimuron and Tank Mixtures on Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. Carroll Johnson III ,
Benjamin G. Mullinix Jr.  and
Steven M. Brown
W. Carroll Johnson III
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Tifton, GA 31793-0748
Benjamin G. Mullinix Jr.
Affiliation:
Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., Tifton, GA 31793-0748
Steven M. Brown
Affiliation:
Coastal Plain Exp. Stn., Tifton, GA 31793-0748
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were conducted in 1989 and 1990 to determine the phytotoxicity of chlorimuron and tank mixtures on ‘Florunner’ peanut. Chlorimuron plus a petroleum oil adjuvant or 2,4-DB was more phytotoxic (P = 0.05) than chlorimuron plus a nonionic surfactant, based on stunting and chlorosis. Chlorimuron mixed with chlorothalonil, chlorothalonil plus sulfur, or esfenvalerate were no more phytotoxic than the standard. Adding sulfur or nonionic surfactant to chlorimuron plus chlorothalonil did not affect phytoxicity. Sequential applications of chlorimuron and 2,4-DB did not completely negate the phytotoxicity of the tank mixture. Despite differences in phytotoxicity, yields were not reduced.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)ammo]carbonyl]sulfonyl]benzoic acidchlorothalonil, tetrachloroisophthalonitrile2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acidesfenvalerate, (S)-cyano(3-phenoxyphenyl)methyl-(S)-4 chloro-alpha(1-methylethyl)-benzene acetatepeanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘Florunner’Peanut injury
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 404 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Backman, P. A. and Hammond, J. M. 1977. Efficacy of sulfur formulations as tank-mixes with fungicides for disease control in peanuts. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 9:12.Google Scholar
2. Campbell, W. V. 1978. Effect of pesticide interactions on the twospotted spider mite on peanuts. Peanut Sci. 5:83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Evans, J. R., Turner, J. C., Gourd, D. R., and McKemie, T. E. 1988. Interaction of bentazon and paraquat for peanut weed control. Proc. So. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:68.Google Scholar
4. Grichar, W. J. and Boswell, T. E. 1987. Herbicide combinations in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 1:290–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Griffin, J. L. and Habetz, R. J. 1989. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to preemergence and postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:459–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hancock, H. G., Weete, J. D., Backman, P. A., and Hammond, J. M. 1984. Problems from pesticide-induced foliar toxicity investigated in peanuts. Highlights of Agric. Res.-AL Agric. Exp. Stn. 31:17.Google Scholar
7. Kapusta, G., Jackson, L. A., and Mason, D. S. 1986. Yield response of weed-free soybeans (Glycine max) to injury from postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Sci. 34:304–307.Google Scholar