Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:20:03.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perennial Sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis) Interference in Soybean (Glycine max) and Dry Edible Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Richard K. Zollinger  and
James J. Kells
Richard K. Zollinger
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop. Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
James J. Kells
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop. Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1987 and 1988 to examine interference from a natural population of perennial sowthistle on soybean and dry edible bean. In 1987, an average of 78 and 90 perennial sowthistle shoots per m2 in 71-cm (wide) crop row spacing reduced soybean and dry edible bean yield by 49% and 36%, respectively. In 1988, a year of less precipitation, an average density of 96 and 88 shoots per m2 reduced soybean and dry bean yield by 87% and 83%, respectively. One cultivation 5 wk after planting increased crop yield and decreased perennial sowthistle density compared with no cultivation. Perennial sowthistle reduced seed weight, germination percentage, and seedling growth rate of seed produced by both crops. In the presence of perennial sowthistle, one cultivation resulted in improved seed quality compared with no cultivation.

Keywords

Perennial sowthistle, Sonchus arvensis L. # SONARdry edible bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. navy ‘C-20’soybean, Glycine max L. var. ‘Hodgson 78’CompetitioncultivationSONAR
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 52 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abramov, N. G. 1969. Control of Cirsium arvense and Sonchus arvensis . Len Konop. 14:34–35.Google Scholar
2. Association of Official Seed Analysts. 1983. Seedling Vigor Testing Handbook. Contribution No. 32. Springfield, IL.Google Scholar
3. Brown, S. M., Whitwell, T., and Street, J. E. 1985. Common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) competition in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 33:503–506.Google Scholar
4. Bukolova, T. P. 1971. A study of the mechanism of action of water-soluble substances of weeds on cultivated plants. p. 60–69 in Grodzinsky, A. M., ed. Physiological-Biochemical Basis of Plant Interactions in Phytocenoses, Vol. 2. Naukova Dumka, Kiev.Google Scholar
5. Burnside, O. C. and Colville, W. L. 1964. Soybean and weed yields as effected by irrigation, row spacing, tillage and Amiben. Weeds 12: 107–112.Google Scholar
6. Crook, T. M. and Renner, K. A. 1990. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) competition and time of removal in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:358–364.Google Scholar
7. Friesen, G. and Shebeski, L. H. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. I. Weed species, their relative abundance and their effect on crop yield. Can. J. Plant Sci. 40:457–467.Google Scholar
8. Groh, H. 1942. Perennial sowthistle and its smooth variety in Canada. Sci. Agric. 23:127–130 Google Scholar
9. Hackett, N. M., Murray, D. S., and Weeks, D. L. 1987. Interference of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) with peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 35:780–784.Google Scholar
10. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberi with corn and soybean. Weeds 10:26–29.Google Scholar
11. Peters, E. J., Gebhardt, M. R., and Stritzke, J. F. 1965. Inter-relations of row spacings, cultivations, and herbicides for weed control in soybean. Weeds 13:285–289.Google Scholar
12. Putnam, A. R. and Tang, C. S. 1986. The Science of Allelopathy. John Wiley & Sons, New York. p. 317.Google Scholar
13. Rice, E. L. 1984. Allelopathy (second edition). Academic Press, Orlando, Fla. p. 29–30.Google Scholar
14. Shashkov, V. P., Kokmakov, P. P., Volkov, E. E., and Trifanova, L. F. 1977. The influence of rhizomatous weeds in spring wheat crops on the utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Agrokhimiya 14: 57–59.Google Scholar
15. Williams, C. S. and Hayes, R. M. 1984. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) competition in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 32: 498–501.Google Scholar
16. Wyse, D. L., Young, F. L., and Jones, R. J. 1986. Influence of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) density and duration of interference on soybean (Glycine max) growth and yield. Weed Sci. 34: 243–247.Google Scholar
17. Young, F. L., Wyse, D. L., and Jones, R. J. 1984. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) interference on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 32:226–234.Google Scholar
18. Young, F. L., Wyse, D. L., and Jones, R. J. 1982. Influence of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) density and duration of interference on soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 30:614–619.Google Scholar