Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:18:49.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patch Management of Herbicide-Resistant Wild Oat (Avena fatua)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hugh J. Beckie ,
Linda M. Hall  and
Barclay Schuba
Hugh J. Beckie*
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0X2, Canada
Linda M. Hall
Affiliation:
Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development/University of Alberta, 410 Agriculture/Forestry Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
Barclay Schuba
Affiliation:
Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration, 102 McKendry Avenue West, Melfort, SK S0E 1A0, Canada
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study was conducted at a 64-ha site in western Canada to determine how preventing seed shed from herbicide-resistant wild oat affects patch expansion over a 6-yr period. Seed shed was prevented in two patches and allowed to occur in two patches (nontreated controls). Annual patch expansion was determined by seed bank sampling and mapping. Crop management practices were performed by the grower. Area of treated patches increased by 35% over the 6-yr period, whereas nontreated patches increased by 330%. Patch expansion was attributed mainly to natural seed dispersal (nontreated) or seed movement by equipment at time of seeding (nontreated and treated). Extensive seed shed from plants in nontreated patches before harvest or control of resistant plants by alternative herbicides minimized seed movement by the combine harvester. Although both treated and nontreated patches were relatively stable over time in this cropping system, preventing seed production and shed in herbicide-resistant wild oat patches can markedly slow the rate of patch expansion.

Keywords

Wild oat, Avena fatua L. # AVEFAGene flowherbicide resistanceintegrated weed managementseed bankseed shedseed spreadACCase, acetyl-CoA carboxylaseALS, acetolactate synthase
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 697 - 705
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1 SRC contribution no. 1620.

References

Literature Cited

Acton, D. F., Padbury, G. A., and Stushnoff, C. T. 1998. The ecoregions of Saskatchewan. Winnipeg, MB: Hignell. 205 p.Google Scholar
Andrews, T. S., Morrison, I. N., and Penner, G. A. 1998. Monitoring the spread of ACCase inhibitor resistance among wild oat (Avena fatua) patches using AFLP analysis. Weed Sci. 46:196–199.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Heap, I. M., Smeda, R. J., and Hall, L. M. 2000. Screening for herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Technol. 14:428–445.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Thomas, A. G., Légère, A., Kelner, D. J., Van Acker, R. C., and Meers, S. 1999. Nature, occurrence, and cost of herbicide-resistant wild oat (Avena fatua) in small-grain production areas. Weed Technol. 13:612–625.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Thomas, A. G., and Stevenson, F. C. 2002. Survey of herbicide-resistant wild oat (Avena fatua) in two townships in Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82:463–471.Google Scholar
Cavan, G., Biss, P., and Moss, S. R. 1998. Herbicide resistance and gene flow in wild-oats (Avena fatua and Avena sterilis spp. ludoviciana). Ann. Appl. Biol. 133:207–217.Google Scholar
Colliver, C. T., Maxwell, B. D., Tyler, D. A., Roberts, D. W., and Long, D. S. 1996. Georeferencing wild oat infestations in small grains: Accuracy and efficiency of three weed survey techniques. in Proceedings of the Third Annual conference on Precision Agriculture. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy. Pp. 453–463.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. M., Maxwell, B. D., and Malchow, W. E. 1996. Spatial and temporal patterns of herbicide resistant wild oats. in Brown, H., Cussans, G. W., Devine, M. D., Duke, S. O., Quintanilla, C. F., Helweg, A., Labrada, R. E., Landes, M., Kudsk, P., and Streibig, J. C., eds. Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress; Copenhagen, Denmark. Flakkebjerg, Slagelse, Denmark: Department of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology. Pp. 1375–1380.Google Scholar
Kenkel, N. C. and Irwin, A. J. 1994. Fractal analysis of dispersal. Abst. Bot. 18:79–84.Google Scholar
Lovett-Doust, L. 1981. Population dynamics and local specialization in a clonal perennial (Ranunculus repens), I: the dynamics of ramets in contrasting habitats. J. Ecol. 69:743–755.Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C. A. and Retzinger, E. J. Jr. 2003. Revised classification of herbicides by site of action for weed resistance management strategies. Weed Technol. 7:605–619.Google Scholar
Manitoba Weed Supervisors Association. 1997. Herbicide Resistance: New Developments and Management Strategies. Carman, MB: Manitoba Agriculture Extension Bulletin. 6 p.Google Scholar
Marshall, E. J. P. 1988. Field-scale estimates of grass weed populations in arable land. Weed Res. 28:191–198.Google Scholar
Murray, B. G., Morrison, I. N., and Friesen, L. F. 2002. Pollen-mediated gene flow in wild oat. Weed Sci. 50:321–325.Google Scholar
Rew, L. J. and Cussans, G. W. 1995. Patch ecology and dynamics—how much do we know?. in Brighton Crop Protection conference—Weeds. Farnham, Surrey, UK: British Crop Protection Council. Pp. 1059–1068.Google Scholar
Rew, L. J. and Cussans, G. W. 1997. Horizontal movement of seeds following tine and plough cultivation: implications for spatial dynamics of weed infestations. Weed Res. 37:247–256.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1243 p.Google Scholar
Sharma, M. P. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1978. The biology of Canadian weeds. 27. Avena fatua L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:141–157.Google Scholar
Shirtliffe, S. J. 1999. The effect of chaff collection on the combine harvester dispersal of wild oat (Avena fatua L.). Ph.D. dissertation. Winnipeg, MB: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Shirtliffe, S. J., Entz, M. H., and Maxwell, B. D. 1998. The effect of chaff collection and harvest timing on the seed spread of wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38:39.Google Scholar
Shirtliffe, S. J., Entz, M. H., and Van Acker, R. C. 2000. Avena fatua development and seed shatter as related to thermal time. Weed Sci. 48:555–560.Google Scholar
Shirtliffe, S. J., Kenkel, N. C., and Entz, M. H. 2002. Fractal analysis of seed dispersal and spatial pattern in wild oats. Comm. Ecol. 3:101–107.Google Scholar
Thill, D. C. and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1997. The nature and consequence of weed spread in cropping systems. Weed Sci. 45:337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. G., Wise, R. F., Frick, B. L., and Juras, L. T. 1996. Saskatchewan weed survey of cereal, oilseed and pulse crops in 1995. Saskatoon, SK: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Weed Survey Ser. Publ. 96-1. 419 p.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. K., Fawcett, R. H., Dent, J. B., and Perkins, T. J. 1990. Spatial weed distribution and economic thresholds for weed control. Crop Prot. 9:337–342.Google Scholar
Walley, F. L., van Kessel, C., and Pennock, D. J. 1996. Landscape-scale variability of N mineralization in forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28:383–391.Google Scholar
Wiles, L. J., Olive, G. W., York, A. C., Gold, H. J., and Wilkerson, G. G. 1992. Spatial distribution of broadleaf weeds in North Carolina soybean (Glycine max) fields. Weed Sci. 40:554–557.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J. and Brain, P. 1991. Long-term stability of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. within cereal fields. Weed Res. 31:367–373.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J. and Cussans, G. W. 1975. A study of the population dynamics of Avena fatua L. as influenced by straw burning, seed shedding and cultivations. Weed Res. 15:249–258.Google Scholar
Woolcock, J. L. and Cousens, R. 2000. A mathematical analysis of factors affecting the rate of spread of patches of annual weeds in an arable field. Weed Sci. 48:27–34.Google Scholar