Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:30:17.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paraquat for Managing Weeds in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Albert E. Smith
Albert E. Smith*
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Ga., Griffin, GA 30223-1797
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted over 2 yr and at two locations in Central Georgia to determine the influence of paraquat applied for weed control in the spring and following first harvest on alfalfa yield and crown carbohydrate content. Paraquat at 0.28 and 0.56 kg ai ha-1 controlled most annual cool-season weeds at 20 d after March treatment. These rates controlled annual warm-season weeds when applied as early as 7 d after first harvest. Treatments applied during March and as late as 7 d after first harvest did not influence alfalfa production or crown carbohydrate content. However, paraquat applied 14 d after first harvest reduced alfalfa yield 40% and significantly decreased crown carbohydrate content at second harvest but the alfalfa had fully recovered by the third harvest. This indicates that alfalfa is resilient to chemical defoliation by paraquat applied for weed control.

Keywords

Paraquat, 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′bipyridinium ionalfalfa, Medicago sativa L. ‘Apollo’Chemical defoliationherbicide injuryhay productiontotal available carbohydrates
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 181 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arnon, D. E. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris . Plant Physiol. 24:1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Dutt, T. E., Harvey, R. G., Fawcett, R. S., Jorgensen, N. A., Larsen, H. J., and Schlough, D. A. 1979. Forage quality and animal performance as influenced by quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) with pronamide. Weed Sci. 27:127–132.Google Scholar
3. Hoveland, C. S., Bouton, J. H., Newsome, J. F., and Calvert, G. V. 1987. Establishment of alfalfa as affected by land preparation and seeding rate. Univ. Ga. Res. Rep. 519.Google Scholar
4. Johnson, J. T. 1985. Alfalfa production in Georgia. Ga. Coop. Ext. Serv. Bull. B-898.Google Scholar
5. Kapusta, G., and Strieker, C. F. 1975. Selective control of downy brome in alfalfa. Weed Sci. 23:202–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Peters, E. J., McKelvey, R. A., and Mattas, R. 1984. Controlling weeds in dormant and nondormant alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Sci. 32:154–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Swan, D. G. 1978. Effect of repeated herbicide applications on alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Sci. 26:151–153.Google Scholar
8. Waddington, J. 1985. Weed control in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) grown for seed. Weed Sci. 33:411–414.Google Scholar
9. Whister, R. L., and Wolfrom, M. L. 1962. Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry. Vol. 1: p. 388–389. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
10. Wilson, R. G. 1981. Weed control in established dryland alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Sci. 29:615–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar