Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:49:29.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oviposition Site Preferences of Galerucella calmariensis and G. pusilla, Biological Control Agents of Purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Cory John Lindgren*
Affiliation:
Manitoba Purple Loosestrife Project, Box 1160, Stonewall, MB. Canada ROC 2Z0

Abstract

Oviposition site preferences for Galerucella calmariensis and G. pusilla, biological weed control agents against purple loosestrife, were examined in 1994 and 1995. The leaves, stems, axils, and flower buds (G. pusilla did not oviposit on flower buds) were found to be the preferred oviposition sites. Oviposited egg masses may be used as a parameter within a biological control monitoring plan, providing information on Galerucella establishment and/or presence, estimating future population size, and providing biological control agent dispersal information. Monitoring for egg masses should concentrate on host plant leaves, where over 56% of all egg masses were oviposited.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Blossey, B. 1995a. Coexistence of two leaf-beetles in the same fundamental niche. 1. Distribution, adult phenology, oviposition, Oikos 74:225234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blossey, B. 1995b. Impact of Galerucella pusilla Duft. and G. calmariensis L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on field populations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). In Delfosse, E. S. and Scott, R. R., eds. Proceedings of the VIII International Symposium on the Biological Control of Weeds. Melbourne, Australia: Department of Scientific and Industrial Research/ Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research. pp. 2731.Google Scholar
Blossey, B., Schroeder, D., Hight, S. D. and Malecki, R. 1994. Host specificity and environmental impact of two leaf beetles (Galerucella calmariensis and G. pusilla) for biological control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Weed Sci. 42:134140.Google Scholar
Hight, S. D., Blossey, B., Laing, J., and DeClerck-Floate, R. 1995. Establishment of insect biological control agents from Europe against Lythrum salicaria in North America. Environ. Entomol. 24:968977.Google Scholar
Malecki, R. A., Blossey, B., Hight, S. D., Schroeder, D., Kok, L. T., and Clouson, J. R. 1993. Biological control of purple loosestrife. BioScience 43:680686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manguin, S., White, R. W., Blossey, B., and Hight, S. D. 1993. Genetics, taxonomy, and ecology of certain species of Galerucella (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 86:397410.Google Scholar
Richie, S. A. and Addison, D. S. 1992. Oviposition preferences of Aedes taeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Florida Mangrove Forests. Environ. Entomol. 21:737744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. 5th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 956 p.Google Scholar
Smits, P. H., vande Vrie, M., and Vlak, J. M. 1986. Oviposition of beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on greenhouse crops. Environ. Entomol. 15:11891191.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. Q., Stuckey, R. L., and Thompson, E. B. 1987. Spread, impact and control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North American wetlands. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish and Wildlife Research 2. 55 p.Google Scholar