Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:05:23.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Minimizing competition between glyphosate-resistant volunteer canola (Brassica napus) and glyphosate-resistant soybean: impact of soybean planting date and rate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2019

Allyson Mierau ,
Eric N. Johnson ,
Robert H. Gulden ,
Jessica D. Weber ,
William E. May  and
Christian J. Willenborg Open the ORCID record for Christian J. Willenborg [Opens in a new window]
Allyson Mierau
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Eric N. Johnson
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Robert H. Gulden
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Jessica D. Weber
Affiliation:
General Manager, Western Applied Research Corporation, Scott, Saskatchewan, Canada
William E. May
Affiliation:
Crop Management Agronomist, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada, Indian Head, Saskatchewan, Canada
Christian J. Willenborg*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Christian J. Willenborg, Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5A8. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years, soybean acreage has increased significantly in western Canada. One of the challenges associated with growing soybean in western Canada is the control of volunteer glyphosate-resistant (GR) canola, because most soybean cultivars are also glyphosate resistant. The objective of this research was to determine the impact of soybean seeding rate and planting date on competition with volunteer canola. We also attempted to determine how high seeding rate could be raised while still being economically feasible for producers. Soybean was seeded at five different seeding rates (targeted 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 plants m−2) and three planting dates (targeted mid-May, late May, and early June) at four sites across western Canada in 2014 and 2015. Soybean yield consistently increased with higher seeding rates, whereas volunteer canola biomass decreased. Planting date generally produced variable results across site-years. An economic analysis determined that the optimal rate was 40 to 60 plants m−2, depending on market price, and the optimal planting date range was from May 20 to June 1.

Keywords

Amit Jhala, University of Nebraska, LincolnGlyphosatecanola, Brassica napus L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrCompetitionglyphosate resistanceintegrated management
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 220 - 228
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (2015) Weekly price summary (last updated June 2015). http://www.agr.gc.ca/eng/industry-markets-and-trade/statistics-and-market-information/by-product-sector/crops/crops-market-information-canadian-industry/weekly-price-summary/?id=1378745200250. Accessed: May 15, 2017Google Scholar
Baird, JM, Walley, FL, Shirtliffe, SJ (2009a) Optimal seeding rate for organic production of field pea in the northern Great Plains. Can J Plant Sci 89:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, JM, Walley, FL, Shirtliffe, SJ (2009b) Optimal seeding rate for organic production of lentil in the northern Great Plains. Can J Plant Sci 89:1089–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, RE, O’Donovan, JT, Harker, KN, Li, X (2002) Beyond herbicides: new approaches to managing weeds. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Environmentally Sustainable Agriculture for Dry Areas. Pp. 305–312Google Scholar
Buhler, DD, Gunsolus, JL (1996) Effect of date of preplant tillage and planting on weed populations and mechanical weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci 44:373–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canola Council of Canada (2015) Seeding rate. https://www.canolacouncil.org/canola-encyclopedia/plant-establishment/seeding-rate/. Accessed: July 2, 2015Google Scholar
Coulter, JA, Nafziger, ED (2007) Planting date and glyphosate timing on soybean. Weed Tech 21:359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, WJ, Cherney, JH (2011) Growth and yield responses of soybean to row spacing and seeding rate. Agron J 103:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bruin, JL, Pedersen, P (2008) Soybean seed yield response to planting date and seeding rate in the upper Midwest. Agron J 100:696–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmore, RW (1998) Soybean cultivar responses to row spacing and seeding rates in rainfed and irrigated environments. J Prod Ag 11:326–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, CM, Gulden, RH (2018) Candidate tools for integrated weed management in soybean at the norther frontier of production. Weed Sci 66:662–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Manitoba (2016) Crop production costs. https://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/business-and-economics/financial-management/cost-of-production.html. Accessed: October 16, 2016Google Scholar
Guillermo, DA, Pedersen, P, Hartzler, RG (2009) Soybean seeding rate effects on weed management. Weed Tech 23:17–22Google Scholar
Gulden, RH, Shirtliffe, SJ, Thomas, AG (2003) Harvest losses of canola (Brassica napus) cause large seedbank inputs. Weed Sci 51:83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardman, LL, Gunsolus, JL (1994) Soybean Growth and Development and Management Information for Replant Decisions. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Extension ServiceGoogle Scholar
Kane, MV, Steele, CC, Grabau, LJ (1997) Early-maturing soybean cropping system: I. yield responses to planting date. Agron J 89:454–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingman, TW, Oliver, LR (1994) Influence of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and soybean (Glycine max) planting date on weed interference. Weed Sci 42:61–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupinsky, JM, Bailey, KL, McMullen, MP, Gossen, BD, Turkington, TK (2002) Managing plant disease risk in diversified cropping systems. Agron J 94:198–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, AN, Van Acker, RC, Friesen, LF (2006) Emergence timing of volunteer canola in spring wheat fields in Manitoba. Weed Sci 54:873–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, CD, Egli, DB, TeKrony, DM (2008) Soybean response to plant population at early and late planting dates in the mid-south. Agron J 100:971–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, M, Mohler, CL, Staver, CP (2001) Enhancing the competitive ability of crops. Pages 302–305 in Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manitoba Agriculture (2017) Crop weather report archive. https://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/weather/weather-report-archive.html. Accessed: May 20, 2017Google Scholar
McWhorter, CG, Barrentine, WL (1975) Cocklebur control in soybeans as affected by cultivars, seeding rates, and methods of weed control. Weed Sci 23:386–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nave, WR, Wax, LM (1971) Effects of weeds on soybean yield and harvesting efficiency. Weed Sci 19:533–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nice, GRW, Buehring, NW, Shaw, DR (2001) Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) response to shading, soybean (Glycine max) row spacing, and population in three management systems. Weed Tech 15:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Oliver, LR (2001) Effect of seeding rate on drilled glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) on seed yield and gross profit margin. Weed Tech 15:284–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[ OMA] Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (2009) Agronomy Guide for Field Crops. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/pub811/2planting.htm. Accessed: April 10, 2013Google Scholar
Parvez, AQ, Gardner, FP, Boote, KJ (1989) Determinate and indeterminate-type soybean cultivar responses to pattern, density, and planting date. Crop Sci 29:150–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennypacker, BW, Risius, ML (1999) Environmental sensitivity of soybean cultivar response to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Phytopath 89:618–622CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Place, GT, Reberg-Horton, SC, Dunphy, JE, Smith, AN (2009) Seeding rate effects on weed control and yield for organic soybean production. Weed Tech 23:497–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayglen Commodities (2016) Recent commodity bids. http://rayglen.com. Accessed: March 20, 2016Google Scholar
Robinson, AP, Conley, SP, Volenec, JJ, Santini, JB (2009) Analysis of high yielding, early-planted soybean in Indiana. Agron J 101:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushing, GS, Oliver, LR (1998) Influence of planting date on common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference in early-maturing soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci 46:99–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (2014) SAS/STAT® 13.2 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/67523/PDF/default/statug.pdf. Accessed: February 20, 2015Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation (2016) Commercial crop market prices. http://www.saskcropinsurance.com/ci/prices#commercialcrop. Accessed: April 15, 2016Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Crop Insurance Corporation (2017) First fall frost map. http://www.saskcropinsurance.com/resources/maps/first-fall-frost-map/. Accessed: June 18, 2017Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Pulse Growers (2017) Seeding. https://saskpulse.com/growing-pulses/soybeans/seeding/. Accessed: August 11, 2017Google Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Shrestha, A, Clements, DR, Booth, BD, Chandler, K (2002) Evaluation of alternative weed management systems in a modified no-tillage corn-soybean-winter wheat rotation: weed densities, crop yield, and economics. Weed Sci 50:504–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, J, Freckleton, RP (2010) Constant final yield. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:173–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, RC, Juskiw, P (2011) Analysis of covariance in agronomy and crop research. Can J Plant Sci 91:621–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L, Wang, R, Hesketh, JD (2001) Effects of photoperiod on growth and development of soybean floral bud in different maturity. Agron J 93:944–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar