Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:58:59.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Management of Glyphosate-Tolerant Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew M. Westhoven
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, 915 W. State St., West Lafayette, IN 47907
Jeff M. Stachler
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210
Mark M. Loux
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210
William G. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, 915 W. State St., West Lafayette, IN 47907
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 2006 and 2007 to evaluate strategies for management of four glyphosate-tolerant common lambsquarters populations in glyphosate-resistant soybeans. Treatments consisted of several different preplant herbicide combinations followed by one or two postemergence applications of 0.84 to 3.36 kg ae/ha of glyphosate. Preplant application of a combination of glyphosate, 2,4-D ester and residual herbicides resulted in the most effective control of all populations, and allowed use of a single postemergence glyphosate application at the lowest rate. Late-season control of common lambsquarters ranged from 66 to 95% where no preplant herbicides were applied, 72 to 97% for preplant application of glyphosate and 2,4-D, and 96 to 100% for the combination of glyphosate, 2,4-D, flumioxazin, and cloransulam-methyl. Individual plants survived and produced seed following single postemergence glyphosate applications of 3.36 kg ae/ha, and multiple glyphosate applications totaling 2.5 kg ae/ha. Multiple postemergence treatments were more effective than single postemergence treatments for reduction of common lambsquarters population density and seed production. The progeny of plants that survived high rates of glyphosate in the field were screened for their response to glyphosate in the greenhouse. Progeny from one of three populations exhibited increased glyphosate tolerance from 1 yr of selection pressure.

Type
Weed Management—Major Crops
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Boerboom, C. M., Stoltenberg, D. E., Jeschke, M. R., Trower, T. L., and Gaska, J. M. 2006. Factors affecting glyphosate control of common lambsquarters. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 61:54.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., and Hunter, J. S. 1978. Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Owen, M. D. K. 1997. Emergence and survival of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 45:98101.Google Scholar
Cardina, J., Herms, C. P., and Doohan, D. J. 2002. Crop rotation and tillage system effects on weed seedbanks. Weed Sci 50:448460.Google Scholar
Conley, S. P., Stoltenberg, D. E., Boerboom, C. M., and Binning, L. K. 2003. Predicting soybean yield loss in giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) communities. Weed Sci 51:402407.Google Scholar
Crook, T. M. and Renner, K. A. 1990. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) competition and time of removal in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 38:358364.Google Scholar
Curran, B. 2005. Herbicide Resistance Weed Update. http://weeds.cas.psu.edu/New_2005/resistance05.html. Accessed: September 2007.Google Scholar
Davis, V. M., Gibson, K. D., Bauman, T. T., Weller, S. C., and Johnson, W. G. 2007. Influence of weed management practices and crop rotation on glyphosate-resistant horseweed population dynamics and crop yield. Weed Sci 55:508516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, V. M., Gibson, K. D., and Johnson, W. G. 2008. A field survey to determine distribution and frequency of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in Indiana. Weed Technol 22:331338.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Johnson, W. G., and Hillger, D. E. 2005. Farmer perceptions of problematic corn and soybean weeds in Indiana. Weed Technol 19:10651070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. M. 2007. Review of glyphosate and ALS-inhibiting herbicide crop resistance and resistance weed management. Weed Technol 21:547558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J. 1995. Creeping resistances: the outcome of using marginally-effective or reduced rates of herbicides. Pages 587590. in. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference.Google Scholar
Harder, D. B., Sprague, C. L., Difonzo, C. D., Renner, K. A., Ott, E. J., and Johnson, W. G. 2007. Influence of stem-boring insects on common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) control in soybean with glyphosate. Weed Technol 21:241248.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. K. 1990. Interference and seed production by common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 38:113118.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 2007. International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.com. Accessed: November 2007.Google Scholar
Hilgenfeld, K. L., Martin, A. R., Mortensen, D. A., and Mason, S. C. 2004. Weed management in a glyphosate resistant soybean system: weed species shifts. Weed Technol 18:284291.Google Scholar
Hite, G. A., King, S. R., Hagood, E. S., and Holtzman, G. I. 2008. Differential response of a Virginia common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) collection to glyphosate. Weed Sci 56:203209.Google Scholar
Hocombe, S. D. 1961. Simple experiments on the greenhouse germination of some East African weed species. Colonial Pesticides Research Unit (Arusha, Tanganykia) Misc. Rep. 285.Google Scholar
Jeschke, M. R. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 2006. Weed community composition after eight years of continuous glyphosate use in a corn–soybean annual rotation. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 58:59.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G. and Gibson, K. D. 2006. Glyphosate-resistant weeds and resistance management strategies: an Indiana grower perspective. Weed Technol 20:768772.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Gibson, K. D., and Conley, S. P. 2007. Does weed size matter? An Indiana grower perspective about weed control timing. Weed Technol 21:542546.Google Scholar
Kniss, A. R., Miller, S. D., Westra, P. H., and Wilson, R. G. 2007. Glyphosate susceptibility in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) is influenced by parental exposure. Weed Sci 55:572577.Google Scholar
Kniss, A. R., Miller, S. D., and Wilson, R. G. 2005. Common lambsquarters control with glyphosate: What's the problem. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 60:200.Google Scholar
Kniss, A. R., Miller, S. D., Wilson, R. G., and Westra, P. H. 2006. Response of two common lambsquarters biotypes to glyphosate. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 61:168.Google Scholar
Lawson, H. M., Waister, P. D., and Stephens, R. J. 1974. Patterns of emergence of several important arable weed species. British Crop Protection Conf. Monogr 9:121135.Google Scholar
Leblanc, M. L., Cloutier, D. C., Stewart, K. A., and Hamel, C. 2004. Calibration and validation of a common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) seedling emergence model. Weed Sci 52:6166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legleiter, T. R., Monnig, N., and Bradley, K. 2006. Evaluation of programs for the management of glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp in soybean. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 61:209.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M., Stachler, J. M., Johnson, W. G., Nice, G. R. W., and Bauman, T. T. 2007. Weed control guide for Ohio and Indiana. City, OH: Ohio State University Extension.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M., Stachler, J. M., Miller, B. A., and Taylor, J. B. 2005. Response of common lambsquarters to glyphosate in the greenhouse and growth chamber. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 60:202.Google Scholar
Madsen, S. B. 1962. Germination of buried and dried stored seeds. III. 1934–1960. Int. Seed Test. Assoc. Proc 27:920928.Google Scholar
Sammons, R. D., Heering, D. C., Dinicola, N., Glick, H., and Elmore, G. A. 2007. Sustainability and stewardship of glyphosate and glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 21:347354.Google Scholar
Schuster, C. L., Shoup, D. E., and Al-Khatib, K. 2007. Response of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) to glyphosate as affected by growth stage. Weed Sci 55:147151.Google Scholar
Taylor-Lovell, S., Wax, L. M., and Bollero, G. 2002. Pre-emergence flumioxazin and pendimethalin and postemergence herbicide systems for soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 16:502511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. Gordon, Derksen, D. A., Blackshaw, R. E., Van Acker, R. C., Legere, A., Wilson, P. R., and Turnbull, G. C. 2004. A multistudy approach to understanding weed population shifts in medium- to long-term tillage systems. Weed Sci 52:874880.Google Scholar
Uva, R. H., Neal, J. C., and Tomaso, J. M. 1997. Weeds of the Northeast. City, State: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Westhoven, A. M., Johnson, W. G., Stachler, J. M., and Loux, M. M. 2007. Management of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) biotypes in glyphosate-resistant soybean in the eastern Cornbelt. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. of Amer 47:232.Google Scholar
Westhoven, A. M., Kruger, G. R., Gerber, C. K., Stachler, J. M., Loux, M. M., and Johnson, W. G. 2008. Characterization of selected common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) biotypes with tolerance to glyphosate. Weed Sci 56:685691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. G. 2002. Risks of weed spectrum shifts and herbicide resistance in glyphosate tolerant cropping systems. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 57:174.Google Scholar
Young, B. G. 2006. Changes in herbicide use pattern and production practices resulting from glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 20:301307.Google Scholar