Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:00:35.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limpograss (Hemarthria altissima) Tolerance to Hexazinone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2017

Cody A. Lastinger ,
José Luiz C. S. Dias ,
Brent A. Sellers ,
Jason A. Ferrell ,
Maria L. Silveira  and
João M. B. Vendramini
Cody A. Lastinger
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, 7922 NW 71 Street, Gainesville, FL 32653
José Luiz C. S. Dias
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, and Associate Professor, Agronomy Department, University of Florida Range Cattle Research and Education Center, 3401 Experiment Station, Ona, FL 33865
Brent A. Sellers*
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, and Associate Professor, Agronomy Department, University of Florida Range Cattle Research and Education Center, 3401 Experiment Station, Ona, FL 33865
Jason A. Ferrell
Affiliation:
Professor, Agronomy Department, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110500, Gainesville, FL 32611
Maria L. Silveira
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Soil and Water Sciences Department, University of Florida Range Cattle Research and Education Center, 3401 Experiment Station, Ona, FL 33865
João M. B. Vendramini
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, and Associate Professor, Agronomy Department, University of Florida Range Cattle Research and Education Center, 3401 Experiment Station, Ona, FL 33865
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were conducted in 2013 and 2014 to investigate the tolerance of limpograss to increasing rates of hexazinone. Dose-response curves were generated using linear and quadratic regression models to determine the hexazinone estimated dose (ED) required to provide 10% (ED10) and 20% (ED20) of visual injury and herbage mass reduction. The ED10 and ED20 for visual estimates of injury were estimated to be 0.05 and 0.14 kg ai ha-1 at 60 d after treatment (DAT). Regarding forage herbage mass reduction, the ED10 and ED20 were estimated to be 0.07 and 0.19 kg ai ha-1 in 2013, whereas in 2014, the ED10 and ED20 were estimated to be 0.03 and 0.06 kg ai ha-1, respectively. The significant difference in herbage mass reduction between 2013 and 2014 was likely due to rainfall patterns, which possibly promoted hexazinone leaching in 2013 and consequently, less activity. Overall, hexazinone resulted in high degrees of limpograss injury across all response variables in both years; therefore, smutgrass control in limpograss pastures with hexazinone may not be a viable option. The presence or absence of smutgrass should be considered before limpograss establishment as there is no viable herbicide to selectively remove smutgrass from limpograss swards.

Keywords

Hexazinonelimpograss, Hemarthria altissima (Poir.) Stapf & C.E. Hubb.Dose-responseforagestoleranceselectivity
Type
Weed Management-Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , October 2017 , pp. 682 - 688
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Kevin Bradley, University of Missouri.

References

Literature Cited

Brecke, BJ (1981) Smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii) control in bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) pastures. Weed Sci 29:553–555 Google Scholar
Brown, WF, Kalmbacher, RS (1998) Nutritional value of native range and improved forages: a perspective from Central and South Florida. 47th Annual Florida Beef Cattle Short Course. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida. Pp 79–88 Google Scholar
Burton, GW, Gates, RN, Gascho, GJ (1997) Response of Pensacola bahiagrass to rates of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers. Soil Crop Sci Soc Fla Proc 56:31–35 Google Scholar
Currey, WL, Parrado, R, Jones, DW (1973) Seed characteristics of smutgrass. Soil Crop Sci Soc Fla Proc 32:53–54 Google Scholar
Davy, J, Forero, L, Nader, G, Ditomaso, J, Kyser, G (2012) Managing Smutgrass in Irrigated Pastures. University of California Agricultural and Natural Resources. UC Peer Reviewed publication 8473. http://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu/pdf/8473.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2017Google Scholar
Dias, JLCS, Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA, Enloe, SF, Vendramini, JM, Moriel, P (2017) Rainfall effects of giant smutgrass control with hexazinone in bahiagrass pastures. Florida Weed Sci Soc Fla Proc 39:7 Google Scholar
Ferrell, JA, Dusky, JA, Mullahey, JJ, Roka, FM (2006) Competition of giant smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus) in a bahiagrass pasture. Weed Sci 54:100–105 Google Scholar
Ferrell, JA, Mullahey, JJ (2006) Effect of mowing and hexazinone application on giant smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus var pyramidalis) control. Weed Technol 20:90–94 Google Scholar
Lastinger, CA, Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA, Vendramini, JMB, Silveira, ML (2016) Limpograss tolerance to herbicides is affected by time of year, but not regrowth height or fertilizer application timing. Crop, Forage and Turf Manag. doi: 10.2134/CFTM-2016-04-0033 Google Scholar
Mislevy, P, Currey, WL, Brecke, BJ (1980) Herbicide and cultural practices in smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii) control. Weed Sci 28:585–588 Google Scholar
Mislevy, P, Martin, FG, Hall, DW (2002) West Indian dropseed/giant smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus var. pyramidalis) control in bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) pastures. Weed Technol 16:707–711 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mislevy, P, Shilling, DG, Martin, FG, Hatch, SL (1999) Smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus) control in bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) pastures. Weed Technol 13:571–575 Google Scholar
Newman, Y, Vendramini, JM, Sollenberger, LE, Quesenberry, K (2014) Limpograss (Hemarthria altissima): Overview and Management. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Florida Cooperative Extension Service. SS-AGR-320. 6 pGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, JC, Bates, DM (2000) Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer-Verlag. p 530 Google Scholar
Quesenberry, KH, Dunn, RA (1978) Differential responses of Hemarthria genotypes to sting nematodes in a greenhouse screening trial. Soil Crop Sci Soc Fla Proc 37:58–61 Google Scholar
Rana, N (2012) Biology of Small Smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus var. indicus) and Giant Smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus var. pyramidalis) and Long Term Management of Giant Smutgrass. Ph.D dissertation. Gainesville, FL: University Florida. 97 pGoogle Scholar
Rana, N, Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA, MacDonald, GE, Silveira, ML, Vendramini, JM (2013) Impact of soil pH on bahiagrass competition with giant smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus var. pyramidalis) and small smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus var. indicus). Weed Sci 61:109–116 Google Scholar
Rana, N, Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA, MacDonald, GE, Silveira, ML, Vendramini, JM (2015) Integrated management techniques for long-term control of giant smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus var. pyramidalis) in bahiagrass pasture in Florida. Weed Technol 29:570–577 Google Scholar
Ritz, C, Streibig, JC (2005) Bioassay analysis using R. J Stat Software 12:1–22 Google Scholar
Shaner, DL (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. Pp 250–251 Google Scholar
Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA (2013) Weed Management in Limpograss. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Florida Cooperative Extension Service. SS-AGR-334. 3 pGoogle Scholar
Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA, MacDonald, GE (2008) Influence of hexazinone on Pensacola bahiagrass growth and crude protein content. Agron J 100:808–812 Google Scholar
Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA, MacDonald, GE, Kline, WN (2009) Dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium) size at application affects herbicide efficacy. Weed Technol 23:247–250 Google Scholar
Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA, Rana, N (2015) Smutgrass control in perennial grass pastures. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Florida Cooperative Extension Service. SS-AGR-18. 4 pGoogle Scholar
Schabenberger, O, Pierce, FJ (2002) Contemporary Statistical Models for the Plant and Soil Sciences. Washington, DC: CRC Press. Pp 504–512 Google Scholar
Shukla, A, Devine, MD (2008) Basis of crop selectivity and weed resistance to triazine herbicides. Pages 111–118 in LeBaron HM, McFarland JE, Burnside OC, eds. The Triazine Herbicides: 50 Years Revolutionizing Agriculture. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Google Scholar
Wilder, BJ, Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA, MacDonald, GE (2011) Response of smutgrass varieties to hexazinone. Forage and Grazinglands. doi: 10.1094/FG-2011-0222-02-RS Google Scholar