Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T18:41:55.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Limiting Green and Yellow Foxtail (Setaria viridis and S. glauca) Seed Production Following Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Harvest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

George O. Kegode*
Affiliation:
West Central Experiment Station and Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267
Frank Forcella
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, North Central Soil Conservation Laboratory, Morris, MN 56267
Beverly R. Durgan
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Green and yellow foxtail seed production following harvest of spring wheat is a concern of producers in the northern Great Plains of the United States and the Prairie Provinces of Canada. Experiments were conducted in 1996 and 1997 in three tillage systems, no till (NT), chisel plow (CP), and moldboard plow (MP), at the University of Minnesota West Central Experiment Station, Morris, MN, to determine whether time of glyphosate application or tillage after spring wheat harvest could reduce postharvest foxtail seed production. In both years, hard red spring wheat was planted in late April and a packaged mixture of fenoxaprop and 2,4-D ester and MCPA ester was applied at a rate of 53 g and 81 g and 246 g ai/ha for grass and broadleaf weed control. Following spring wheat harvest, each main plot was subdivided into seven subplots, including an untreated control. One subplot was disked twice at 4 to 6 d after harvest (DAH) of spring wheat, and five other subplots had glyphosate (0.25 kg ai/ ha) applied on different days (1 to 31 DAH). Foxtail seeds were collected from the soil surface following first frost, and the number of green and yellow foxtail seeds were determined. Tillage immediately after spring wheat harvest eliminated foxtail plants, and no new foxtail seedlings emerged in either tilled or glyphosate-treated plots despite ideal postharvest conditions for foxtail germination and emergence in 1997. Most viable green foxtail seeds were consistently obtained in NT plots, whereas yellow foxtail seed production varied among tillage systems. Either tillage soon after spring wheat harvest or glyphosate application within 16 DAH reduced green and yellow foxtail seed production by greater than 70%.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Blackshaw, R. E., Stobbe, E. H., and Sturko, A.R.W. 1981. Effect of seeding dates and densities of green foxtail (Setaria viridis) on the growth and productivity of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 29:212217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1992. Population dynamics and control of annual weeds in corn (Zea mays) as influenced by tillage systems. Weed Sci. 40:241248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Mester, T. C. 1991. Effect of tillage systems on emergence depth of giant (Seteria faberi) and green foxtail (S. viridis). Weed Sci. 39:200203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavers, P. B. 1983. Seed demography. Can. J. Bot. 61:35783590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavers, P. B. and Benoit, D. L. 1989. Seed banks in arable land. In Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T., and Simpson, R. L., eds. Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 107109 Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1990. Northern Great Plains. In Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Chapter 5. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 90126.Google Scholar
Pay, P. K. 1990. A brief overview of the biology and distribution of weeds in wheat. In Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Chapter 3. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 3350.Google Scholar
Heid, W. D. Jr. 1969. Montana farm adjustments and their economic effects on farm income 1954–1967. Bozeman: Montana Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 629. 33 p.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. H., Morrison, I. N., and Rourke, D.S.R. 1990. The Canadian Prairie Provinces. In Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Chapter 4. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 5189.Google Scholar
Khan, M., Donald, W. W., and Prato, T. 1996. Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) management can substitute for diclofop for foxtail (Setaria spp.) control. Weed Sci. 44:362372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, C. R. 1967. A rapid method for enumeration of viable seeds in the soil. Weed Sci. 15:381382.Google Scholar
Nadeau, L. B. and Morrison, I. N. 1986. Influence of soil moisture on shoot and root growth of green and yellow foxtail (Setaria viridis and S. lutescens). Weed Sci. 34:225232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. F. 1996. Weed population dynamics: seed production. Proc. 2nd Int. Weed Control Congr. 2:1520.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. E. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1992. Green foxtail (Setaria viridis) competition with spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 6:291296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, A. and Ashford, R. 1972. Control of green foxtail in wheat with trifluralin. Weed Sci. 20:2327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar