Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:49:00.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) Control with Quinclorac

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Brian D. Kuehl
Affiliation:
Plant Science Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105
Rodney G. Lym
Affiliation:
Plant Science Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105

Abstract

Quinclorac is a systemic herbicide registered to control annual grass and broadleaf weeds in rice. Field research was conducted to determine the most effective quinclorac treatment for leafy spurge control. Leafy spurge control 12 mo after treatment (MAT) averaged 38 and 77% when quinclorac was applied at 0.56 and 1.7 kg ae/ha, respectively. Quinclorac applied with the crop-oil-based adjuvant Scoil provided similar leafy spurge control compared to quinclorac applied alone. Quinclorac plus Scoil applied with picloram provided better leafy spurge control than quinclorac plus Scoil alone. The optimum date for fall treatment with quinclorac is broad. Quinclorac at 1.1 kg/ha plus Scoil at 2.3 L/ha applied on September 1, September 15, October 1, and October 15 provided similar leafy spurge control and averaged 56% 12 MAT.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bangsund, D. A. and Leistritz, F. L. 1991. Economic impacts of leafy spurge on grazing lands in the Northern Great Plains. Agricultural Economic Report No. 275-S. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University. 11 p.Google Scholar
BASF Corporation. 1985. BAS 514.H; Technical Data Sheet. Parsippany, NJ: Chemicals Division. 4 p.Google Scholar
BASF Corporation. 1992. Quinclorac (BAS 514.H) for Use in Turf; Technical Data Sheet. Parsippany, NJ: Chemicals Division. 9 p.Google Scholar
Enache, A. J. and Ilnicki, R. D. 1991. BAS 514 and dithiopyr for weed control in cool-season turfgrasses. Weed Technol. 5:616621.Google Scholar
Ferrell, M. A. 1992. Quinclorac activity on leafy spurge. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 153 p.Google Scholar
Landgraf, B. K., Fay, P. K., and Havstad, K. M. 1984. Utilization of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) by sheep. Weed Sci. 32:348352.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G. 1992. Leafy spurge control with quinclorac applied with various additives. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. pp. 141142.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G., and Kirby, D. R. 1987. Cattle foraging behavior in leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula)-infested rangeland. Weed Technol. 1:314318.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1985. Leafy spurge control with herbicides in North Dakota: 20-year summary. J. Range Manage. 38:149154.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1988. Survey for picloram in North Dakota groundwater. Weed Technol. 2:217222.Google Scholar
Manners, G. D. 1987. Role of phytochemistry in attacking the leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) problem. In Waller, G. R., ed. Allelochemicals: Role in Agriculture and Forestry. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. pp. 229237.Google Scholar
Manthey, F. A., Nalewaja, J. D., and Szelezniak, E. F. 1990. Small grain and grass weed response to BAS 514 with adjuvants. Weed Technol. 4:366370.Google Scholar
Messersmith, C. G. 1983. The leafy spurge plant. N.D. Farm Res. 40(5): 37.Google Scholar
Muenscher, W. C. 1940. Poisonous Plants of the United States. New York: Macmillan. pp. 139143.Google Scholar
Stroh, R. K., Leitch, J. A., and Bangsund, D. A. 1990. Leafy spurge patch expansion. N.D. Farm Res. 47(6): 1517.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. R. and Thill, D. C. 1992. BAS 514-34-H tank mixes to control broadlcaf weeds in spring wheat. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci.: pp. III146–III147.Google Scholar