Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:34:48.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leaf-Waste Pellets as a Herbicide Carrier for Container-Grown Ornamental Plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jayesh B. Samtani ,
Gary J. Kling  and
David J. Williams
Jayesh B. Samtani*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, 1201 S. Dorner Drive, Urbana, IL 61801
Gary J. Kling
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, 1201 S. Dorner Drive, Urbana, IL 61801
David J. Williams
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, 1201 S. Dorner Drive, Urbana, IL 61801
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An organic herbicide carrier could help reduce misapplication and environmental pollution associated with spray application of herbicides. Pellets prepared from landscape leaves that were dried, ground, and pelletized were evaluated as a preemergence herbicide carrier for container-grown ornamental plants. Isoxaben, pendimethalin, and prodiamine at rates of 1.12, 2.25, and 2.25 kg ai/ha, respectively, with either water or landscape leaf-waste pellets as a carrier were applied to chrysanthemum ‘Lisa’, spirea ‘Neon Flash’, and wintercreeper ‘Coloratus’. Common groundsel, common purslane, and giant foxtail were seeded following herbicide application. Leaf-waste pellets as a carrier produced equivalent efficacy and phytotoxicity ratings to conventional spray application of pendimethalin and prodiamine on both chrysanthemum and wintercreeper. The leaf-waste pellets were not an effective carrier for the application of isoxaben alone. The pellets had inconsistent effects on spirea phytotoxicity and growth.

Keywords

Isoxaben, pendimethalin, prodiamine, common groundsel, Senecio vulgaris L. #3 SENVU, common purslane, Portulaca oleracea L. # POROL, giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. # SETFA, chrysanthemum, Dendranthema × grandiflorum (Ramat.) Kitam. ‘Lisa’, spirea, Spiraea japonica L.f. ‘Neon Flash’, wintercreeper, Euonymus fortunei (Turcz.) Hand.-Mazz. ‘Coloratus’DAT, days after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 942 - 949
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adams, D. 1990. Chemical weed control in containerized hardy ornamental nursery stock. Professional Hort. 4:70–75.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. P. 1977. Weed Science Principles. St. Paul, MN West Pub. 171–200.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 2002. Yoder Spray Mum Culture. http://www.yoder.com. Accessed: July 4, 2002.Google Scholar
Appleton, B. L. and Derr, J. F. 1990. Use of geotextile disks for container weed control. HortScience 25:666–668.Google Scholar
Chong, C. 2003. Experiences with weed discs and other nonchemical alternatives for container weed control. HortTechnology 13:23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretz, T. A. 1972. Weed competition in container grown Japanese holly. HortScience 7:485–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilliam, C. H., Fare, D. C., and Beasley, A. 1992. Nontarget herbicide losses from application of granular Ronstar to container nurseries. J. Environ. Hort. 10:175–176.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. L. and Iles, J. K. 1998. Mulch matters. Am. Nurseryman 187:24–31.Google Scholar
Gorski, S. F. 1993. Slow-release delivery system for herbicides in container-grown stock. Weed Technol. 7:894–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koncal, S. F., Gorske, S. F., and Fretz, T. A. 1981. Slow-release herbicide formulation for weed control in container-grown plants. HortScience 16:83–84.Google Scholar
Mathers, H. M. 2002. Get tough on weeds. Landscape Manage. 41:72–79.Google Scholar
Mathers, H. M. 2003. Novel methods of weed control in containers. HortTechnology 13:28–34.Google Scholar
Monaco, T. J., Weller, C. S., and Ashton, F. M. 2002. Weed Science: Principles and Practices. 4th ed. New York J. Wiley. 75.Google Scholar
Riley, M. B. 2003. Herbicide losses in runoff of containerized plant production nurseries. HortTechnology 13:16–22.Google Scholar
Riley, M. B., Keese, R. J., Camper, N. D., Whitwell, T., and Wilson, P. C. 1994. Pendimethalin and oxyfluorfen residues in pond water and sediment from container plant nurseries. Weed Technol. 8:299–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, D. W. 1988. Mulches and herbicides in ornamental plantings. HortScience 23:547–551.Google Scholar
Saxton, A. M. 1998. A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. in. Proceedings of the 23rd SAS Users Group International. Cary, NC SAS Institute. 1243–1246.Google Scholar
Smith, D. R., Gilliam, C. H., Edwards, J. H., Olive, J. W., Eakes, D. J., and Williams, J. D. 1998. Recycled waste paper as a non-chemical alternative for weed control in container production. J. Environ. Hort. 16:69–75.Google Scholar
Watkins, P. A. and Heggers, W. J. 1982. Weed problems—their control in container grown nursery stock. Aust. Hort. 80:87–92.Google Scholar