Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:06:28.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

KIH-485 and S-metolachlor Efficacy Comparisons in Conventional and No-Tillage Corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Patrick W. Geier ,
Phillip W. Stahlman  and
John C. Frihauf
Patrick W. Geier*
Affiliation:
Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS 67601
Phillip W. Stahlman
Affiliation:
Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS 67601
John C. Frihauf
Affiliation:
Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS 67601
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 2003 and 2004 to compare the effectiveness of KIH-485 and S-metolachlor for PRE weed control in no-tillage and conventional-tillage corn. Longspine sandbur control increased as KIH-485 or S-metolachlor rates increased in conventional-tillage corn, but control did not exceed 75% when averaged over experiments. Both herbicides controlled at least 87% of green foxtail with the exception of no-tillage corn in 2004, when KIH-485 was more effective than S-metolachlor at lower rates. Palmer amaranth control ranged from 85 to 100% in 2003 and 80 to 100% in 2004, with the exception of only 57 to 76% control at the lowest two S-metolachlor rates in 2004. Puncturevine control exceeded 94% with all treatments in 2003. In 2004, KIH-485 controlled 86 to 96% of the puncturevine, whereas S-metolachlor controlled only 70 to 81%. Mixtures of atrazine with KIH-485 or S-metolachlor generally provided the most effective control of broadleaf weeds studied.

Keywords

AtrazineKIH-485S-metolachlorPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. #3 AMAPAgreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. # SETVIpuncturevine, Tribulus terrestris L. # TRBTElongspine sandbur, Cenchrus longispinus (Hack.) Fern. # CCHPAcorn, Zea mays L.Tillage systemsbest management practicesBMP, best management practicesDAT, days after herbicide treatmentKow, herbicide adsorption coefficient
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 622 - 626
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2004a. Agricultural chemical use database. National Agricultural Statistics Service: Web page: http://www.pestmanagement.info/nass/act_dsp_usage_multiple.cfm. Accessed: December 30, 2004.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2004b. Kansas Farm Facts 2004. Kansas Agricultural Statistics Service. Topeka, KS: Kansas Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 105 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2004c. KIH-485 Technical Sheet. White Plains, NY: K-I Chemical U.S.A. 4 p.Google Scholar
Baker, J. L. and Mickelson, S. K. 1994. Application technology and best management practices for minimizing herbicide runoff. Weed Technol. 8:862–869.Google Scholar
Battaglin, W. A., Thurman, E. M., Kalkhoff, S. J., and Porter, S. D. 2003. Herbicides and transformation products in surface waters of the Midwestern United States. J. Am. Water Resources Assn. 39:743–756.Google Scholar
Battaglin, W. A., Kolpin, D. W., Scribner, E. A., Kuivila, K. M., and Sandstrom, M. W. 2005. Glyphosate, other herbicides, and transformation products in Midwestern streams, 2002. J. Am. Water Resources Assn. 41:323–332.Google Scholar
Devlin, D. L. and Regehr, D. L. 1996. Water Quality: Best Management Practices for Atrazine. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. MF-2182. 4 p.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W., Archer, D., Johnson, W. G., and Nelson, K. 2004. Zone herbicide application controls annual weeds and reduces residual herbicide use in corn. Weed Sci. 52:821–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, H. and Jones, R. D. 1994. Potential problems associated with atrazine, cyanazine, and alachlor in surface water source drinking water. Weed Technol. 8:852–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rector, R. J., Regehr, D. L., Barnes, P. L., and Loughin, T. M. 2003. Atrazine, S-metolachlor, and isoxaflutole loss in runoff as affected by rainfall and management. Weed Sci. 51:810–816.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2000. SAS User's Guide, Version 8.01. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1686 p.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. ed. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Wright, R. J., Witkowski, J. F., and Schulze, L. D. 1993. Best management practices for agricultural pesticides to protect water resources. Nebguide G93-1182-A. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service, University of Nebraska. 6 p.Google Scholar