Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T12:53:20.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control Systems for Field Corn (Zea mays) Utilizing Crop Rotation and Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Hani Z. Ghosheh  and
James M. Chandler
Hani Z. Ghosheh
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, TX 77843
James M. Chandler
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, College Station, TX 77843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Johnsongrass control systems that included commercially available corn herbicides applied to crop sequences of continuous corn or corn–cotton–corn rotation were evaluated over a 3-yr period at the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station in Burleson County. Herbicide treatments evaluated were EPTC + R-25788 applied preplant incorporated (PPI); metolachlor applied preemergence (PRE); nicosulfuron applied postemergence (POST); and the combination of metolachlor PRE and glyphosate POST applied after corn harvest. Weed control practices applied to plots planted to cotton in the second growing season provided excellent johnsongrass control (≈ 95%). Visual control ratings indicated that nicosulfuron provided the best johnsongrass control (> 80%) among the herbicides evaluated all three years. Metolachlor and glyphosate combinations provided acceptable johnsongrass control the third year of the experiment in both cropping sequences. Corn grain yield and johnsongrass control were best in cotton-rotated plots. The highest returns observed in continuous corn were from either nicosulfuron or the combination of metolachlor and glyphosate. Net returns for all control systems in corn–cotton–corn rotated plots were greater than the weedy check and were equivalent to the lead systems in continuous corn.

Keywords

EPTC, S-ethyl dipropyl carbamothioateglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinemetolachlor 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamidenicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamideR-25788, 2,2-dichloro-N-N-di-2-propenylacetamidejohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.# SORHAcorn, Zea mays L. ‘DPL G4673B’ and ‘DPL G4666’cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 825.’Fluazifop-Pfluometuronpendimethalincorn reproductive parametereconomical evaluationjohnsongrass aboveground fresh weightSORHAfb, followed byPOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 623 - 630
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H., ed. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 352 p.Google Scholar
Banks, P. A. and Bundschuh, S. A. 1989. Johnsongrass control in conventionally tilled and no-tilled soybean with foliar-applied herbicides. Agron. J. 81:757–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendixen, L. E. 1986. Corn (Zea mays) yield in relationship to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) population. Weed Sci. 34:449–451.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. C. and Chandler, J. M. 1987. Influence of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) density and period of competition on cotton yield. Weed Sci. 35:63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. M., Chandler, J. M., and Morrison, J. E. Jr. 1988. Glyphosate for johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in no-till sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Sci. 36:510–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C. H. and Keeley, P. E. 1987. Selective control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with foliar herbicides. Weed Sci. 35:418–421.Google Scholar
Cornforth, G. C. 1994. Texas Crop Enterprise Budgets—Central Texas District. B-1241(C08). College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Extension Service. 15 p.Google Scholar
Dale, J. E. and Chandler, J. M. 1979. Herbicide–crop rotation for johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control. Weed Sci. 27:479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derting, C. W., Andrews, O. N. Jr., Duncan, R. G., and Frost, K. R. Jr. 1973. Two years of perennial weed control investigations with glyphosate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:44–50.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:392–407.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1994. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:279–299.Google Scholar
Fell, F. H., Helpert, C. W., and Merkle, M. G. 1973. Fall application of herbicides for johnsongrass control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:193.Google Scholar
Friedman, T. and Horowitz, M. 1970. Phytotoxicity of subterranean residues of three perennial weeds. Weed Res. 10:382–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, D. T. and Nault, L. R. 1977. Involvement of maize dwarf virus and other agents in stunting diseases of Zea mays in the United Slates. Phytopathology 67:27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, D. R., Kladivko, E. J., Mannering, J. V., West, T. D., and Parsons, S. D. 1988. Long-term tillage and rotation effects on corn growth and yield on high and low organic matter, poorly drained soils. Agron. J. 80:599–605.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds—Distribution and Biology. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. 609 p.Google Scholar
Janke, R. R., Mt. Pleasant, J., Peters, S. E., and Bohlke, M. 1991. Long-term, long-input cropping system research. In Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education in the Field. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. pp. 291–317.Google Scholar
Jeffery, L. S., English, J. R., and Council, J. 1981. The effects of fall application of glyphosate on corn (Zea mays), soybeans (Glycine max), and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 29:190–195.Google Scholar
Keeley, P. A., Thullen, R. J., and Carter, C. H. 1987. Repeated annual applications of herbicides for control of rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 35:75–80.Google Scholar
Lopez, J. A. 1988. Biological Aspects and Control of Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] in Grain Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. . Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. 118 p.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1989. History, biology, and control of johnsongrass. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:85–121.Google Scholar
Millhollon, R. W. 1985. Progressive kill of rhizomatous johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) from repeated treatment with dalapon, MSMA, or asulam. Weed Sci. 33:216–221.Google Scholar
Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Kells, J. J., Lueschen, W. E., and Fritz, V. A. 1991. Effect of DPX-V9360 and terbufos on field and sweet corn (Zea mays) under three environments. Weed Technol. 5:130–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. C. and Giles, J. F. 1989. Weed management in two potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars using tillage and pendimethalin. Weed Sci. 37:228–232.Google Scholar
Peterson, T. A. and Varvel, G. E. 1989. Crop yield as affected by rotation and nitrogen rate. III. Corn. Agron. J. 81:735–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosales, R. E. 1992. Control quimico post-emergente del zacate Johnson Sorghum halepense en maiz. Agrocienc. Prot. Veg. 3:115–120.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibitory herbicides. In Powles, S. B. and Hokum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants—Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 83–139.Google Scholar
Steckel, G. J. and DeFelice, M. S. 1995. Reducing johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) interference in corn (Zea mays) with herbicides and cultivation. Weed Technol. 9:53–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, M. L. and Wiese, A. F. 1987. Johnsongrass control in irrigated cropping systems. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:319–322.Google Scholar