Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T03:55:26.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Isoproturon-Resistant Littleseed Canarygrass (Phalaris minor) and its Response to Alternate Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

R. S. Chhokar  and
R. K. Malik
R. S. Chhokar*
Affiliation:
Agronomy, Resource Management Unit, Directorate of Wheat Research, Karnal 132 001, India
R. K. Malik
Affiliation:
Weed Science, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar 125 004, India
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Littleseed canarygrass, a troublesome wheat weed, has developed resistance against isoproturon in India. Laboratory, pot, and field experiments were conducted to quantify the level of isoproturon resistance in various littleseed canarygrass biotypes and to evaluate the response of isoproturon-resistant littleseed canarygrass to alternate herbicides. For quantification of resistance, 10 littleseed canarygrass biotypes were collected from fields with a varied history of cropping and herbicide use. Pot studies indicated that 6 out of the 10 biotypes tested were resistant to isoproturon. The resistant (R) biotypes had 50% growth reduction values, 5 to 10 times greater than that of the most susceptible biotype. The R biotypes were from areas where isoproturon had been used continuously for more than 10 yr in wheat under a continuous rice–wheat cropping system. The isoproturon resistance was not detected where crops and herbicides were rotated. Under field conditions, postemergence isoproturon at 1,000 g/ha 32 d after sowing failed to control littleseed canarygrass and as a result wheat grain yield decreased by 65% compared with the weed-free control. The herbicides observed to be effective in wheat against isoproturon-resistant littleseed canarygrass were CGA 184927 (50 to 60 g ai/ha), fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (100 to 120 g/ha), ICIA 0604 (350 g ai/ha), and MON 37503 (25 g ai/ha). The use of these herbicides increased the grain yield by 200% or more when compared with the weedy check. Among the herbicides tested, MON 37503 at 25 g ai/ha was the best because of complex weed flora control and produced wheat yield similar to that of the weed-free control. Based on this study, the absence of resistance when herbicides and crops were rotated indicates that growers should follow herbicide and crop rotation in order to avoid development of herbicide resistance in the near future. The integration of this system (crop and herbicide rotation) with cultural and mechanical means of weed control could be further targeted as a long-term strategy for resistance management.

Keywords

CGA 184927 (proposed common name, clodinafop), 2-propynyl-(R)-2-[4-(5-chloro-3-fluoro-2-pyridyloxy)phenoxy]propionatefenoxaprop-p-ethylICIA 0604 (proposed common name, tralkoxydim), 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)propyl]-3-hydroxy-5-(2,4,6-trimethyl phenyl)cyclohex-2-enoneMON 37503 (proposed common name, sulfosulfuron), 1-(2-ethylsulfonylimidazol[1,2-a]pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-3-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)urealittleseed canarygrass, Phalaris minor Retz #3 PHAMIrice, Oryza sativa L.wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Biotype, competition, cross-resistance, germination, herbicide resistanceCRD, completely randomized designDAS, days after sowingGR50, 50% growth reductionR, resistantRI, resistance index; S, susceptible
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 2002 , pp. 116 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Afentouli, C. G. and Eleftherohorinos, I. G. 1996. Littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor) and short spiked canarygrass (Phalaris brachystachys) interference in wheat and barley. Weed Sci. 44: 560–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balyan, R. S. and Malik, R. K. 1989. Influence of nitrogen on competition of wild canarygrass (P. minor) in wheat. Pestology 13: 5–6.Google Scholar
Banga, R. S., Yadav, A., and Malik, R. K. 1997. Crop rotation an effective means to control resistant Phalaris minor in wheat. Farmer Parliament 33: 15–16.Google Scholar
Burnet, M.W.M., Hildebrand, O. B., Holtum, J.A.M., and Powles, S. B. 1991. Amitrole, triazine, sustituted urea and metribuzin resistance in a biotype of rigid ryegrass (L. rigidum). Weed Sci. 39: 317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catizone, P. and Viggiani, P. 1980. Un quadriennio di ricerche sulle falaridi infestanti il grano. Atti Gioruate Fitopatalogiche (Suppl.). 3: 213–228.Google Scholar
Challaih, O. C. Burnside, Wicks, G. A., and Johnson, V. A. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 34: 689–693.Google Scholar
Chhokar, R. S. 1998. Biology and Control of Isoproturon Resistant Littleseed Canarygrass (Phalaris minor). Ph.D. dissertation. CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India. pp. 1–122.Google Scholar
Chhokar, R. S. and Malik, R. K. 1999. Effect of temperature on the germination of Phalaris minor Retz. Indian J. Weed Sci. 31: 73–74.Google Scholar
Chhokar, R. S., Malik, R. K., and Balyan, R. S. 1999. Effect of moisture stress and seeding depth on germination of littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz.). Indian J. Weed Sci. 31: 78–79.Google Scholar
Cotterman, J. C. 1996. Current status of herbicides-resistant weeds and their management strategies. In Innovative Weed Management Strategy for Sustainable Agriculture, 15th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, June 1996, Japan. Volume 4. pp. 124–132.Google Scholar
Cudney, D. W. and Hill, J. E. 1979. The response of wheat grown with three population levels of canarygrass to various herbicide treatments. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 32: 55–56.Google Scholar
Felipe, M. R., Pozuelo, J. M., Lucas, M. M., and Campo del, F. F. 1986. The effect of isoproturon on root growth and ultrastructure of the photosynthetic apparatus of two wheat cultivars and a weed. Physiol. Plant. 66: 563–568.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. 1971. Probit Analysis. London: Cambridge Press. 377 p.Google Scholar
Gill, H. S. and Brar, L. S. 1975. Nitrofen and methabenzthiazuron for control of Phalaris minor L. in wheat in Punjab (India). PANS 21: 182–187.Google Scholar
Godinho, I. and Costa, J.C.A. 1981. Competition of Phalaris minor in wheat. In 1st Congresso Portugues de Fitiatria e de Fitofarmacologia e III Simposio Nacional de Herbologia, 1980 (1981) Oeiras: Portugal. Volume 3. pp. 237–243.Google Scholar
Gressel, J. and Segal, L. A. 1990. Modelling the effectiveness of herbicide rotations and mixtures as strategies to delay or preclude resistance. Weed Technol. 4: 186–198.Google Scholar
Holt, J. S. and Thill, D. C. 1994. Growth and productivity of resistant plants. In Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers. pp. 229–316.Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M. and Maxwell, B. D. 1994. Population genetics and the evolution of herbicides resistance in weeds. Phytoprotection 75 (Suppl.): 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khera, K. L., Sandhu, B. S., Aujla, T. S., Singh, C. B., and Kumar, K. 1995. Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in relation to small canarygrass (Phalaris minor) under different levels of irrigation, nitrogen and weed population. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 65: 717–722.Google Scholar
Malik, R. K. and Singh, S. 1993. Evolving strategies for herbicide use in wheat. Resistance and integrated weed management. In Proceedings of the Indian Society of Weed Science International Symposium on Integrated Weed Management for Sustainable Agriculture, November 18 to 20, 1993, Hisar, India. Volume 1. pp. 225–238.Google Scholar
Malik, R. K. and Singh, S. 1995. Littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz.) resistance to isoproturon in India. Weed Technol. 9: 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, R. K., Yadav, A., Garg, V. K., Balyan, R. S., Malik, Y. S., Malik, R. S., Singh, S., and Dhawan, R. 1995. Herbicide Resistance, Current Status and Research Findings. Extension Year Bulletin. Hisar, India: Haryana Agricultural University. pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Maxwell, B. D. and Mortimer, A. M. 1994. Selection for herbicide resistance. In Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistary. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers. pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Mehra, S. P. and Gill, H. S. 1988. Effect of temperature on germination of Phalaris minor Retz. and its competition in wheat. J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 25: 529–533.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Kirkwood, R. C., and Marshall, G. 1997. Effects of isoproturon on photosynthesis in susceptible and resistant biotypes of Phalaris minor and wheat. Weed Res. 37: 315–324.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Kirkwood, R. C., and Marshall, G. 1998a. Effect of ABT on the activity and rate of degradation of isoproturon in resistant biotype of Phalaris minor and wheat. Pestic. Sci. 53: 123–132.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Kirkwood, R. C., and Marshall, G. 1998b. Effect of mono-oxygenase inhibitor piperonyl butoxide on herbicidal activity and metabolism of isoproturon in resistant biotypes of Phalaris minor . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 59: 143–153.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Malik, R. K., Balyan, R. S., and Singh, S. 1995. Distribution of weed flora of wheat in Haryana. Indian J. Weed Sci. 27: 114–121.Google Scholar
Singh, S. 1996. Effect of Rice Straw Burning, Nitrogen and Herbicides on Wheat and Phalaris minor . Ph.D. dissertation. CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India. 101 p.Google Scholar
Tal, A., Zarka, S., and Rubin, B. 1996. Fenoxaprop-P resistance in Phalaris minor conferred by an insensitive acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 56: 134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welbank, P. J. 1963. A comparison of competitive effects of some common weed species. Ann. Appl. Biol. 51: 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B. J. and Wright, J. K. 1990. Predicting the growth and competitive effects of annual weeds in wheat. Weed Res. 30: 201–211.Google Scholar
Wrubel, R. P. and Gressel, J. 1994. Are herbicide mixtures useful for delaying the rapid evolution of resistance? A case study. Weed Technol. 8: 635–648.Google Scholar