Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:17:22.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to the Symposium: History of Sulfonylurea Herbicide Use in Turfgrass Environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Prasanta C. Bhowmik
Prasanta C. Bhowmik*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-7245
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed management is a common practice in golf courses, home lawns, and sod production systems. Sulfonylurea (SU) herbicides were initially introduced in the agricultural market in 1982; however, SUs were also evaluated for control of weeds and overseeded grasses. Later, SUs were evaluated for selective control of broadleaf weeds, sedges, and kyllinga species in cool- and warm-season turfgrasses. In the 1990s, chlorsulfuron and metsulfuron were registered for selective control of broadleaf weeds, such as wild garlic, spotted spurge, and difficult-to-control grasses, such as bahiagrass in turfgrass. Now, there are several SUs registered for specific weed management in both cool- and warm-season turfgrasses. The current status of SUs, along with potential benefits and drawbacks in using these herbicides for weed management practices, are discussed. The research findings, possible recommendations in relation to the safety of turfgrass (established and overseeding stands), environmental concerns (persistence and lateral movement), and management practices in cool- and warm-season turfgrasses are discussed, including the potential evolution of weed resistance.

El manejo de malezas es una práctica común en campos de golf, en jardines residenciales y en los sistemas de producción de césped. Los herbicidas sulfonylurea (SU) fueron inicialmente introducidos al mercado agrícola en 1982. Más tarde, los Sus fueron evaluados para el control selectivo de malezas de hoja ancha y ciperáceas incluyendo especies Kyllinga en céspedes de estaciones frías y cálidas. En los 1990's el chlorsulfuron y el metsulfuron fueron introducidos al mercado de los céspedes para el control selectivo de malezas de hoja ancha y gramíneas difíciles de controlar, incluyendo Allium vineale, Chamaesyce humistrata y Paspalum notatum. Desde entonces, varios nuevos herbicidas sulfonylurea fueron introducidos para propósitos específicos en el manejo de malezas en céspedes de estaciones frías y cálidas. La situación actual de los SUs, junto con los beneficios y desventajas potenciales del uso de estos herbicidas para las prácticas de manejo de malezas son discutidos en el presente trabajo. Así mismo se discuten los resultados de investigación, posibles recomendaciones en relación a la seguridad de los céspedes (ya sea establecidos o resembrados), preocupaciones ambientales (persistencia y movimiento lateral) y las prácticas de manejo en céspedes de estaciones frías y cálidas, incluyendo el potencial de evolución de resistencia de las malezas a herbicidas SU.

Keywords

Chlorsulfuronmetsulfuronbahiagrass, Paspalum notatum Fluggéspotted spurge, Chamaesyce maculata (L.) Smallwild garlic, Allium vineale L.History of sulfonylureaskyllinga controlmanagementresistancesedge control
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 575 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bendixen, L. E. and Nandihalli, U. B. 1987. Worldwide distribution of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:61–65.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. 2010. Biology and control of Kyllinga gracillima in turfgrass environments. 2010 Second European Turfgrass Society conference, April 11–14, 2010, Angers, France.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. and Sarkar, D. 2008. Response of Cyperus esculentus to sulfosulfuron in turfgrass. Abstract 656 in Proceedings of the International Weed Science Congress, Vancouver, Canada 2008. http://www.iwss.info/docs/IWSC_2008_Abstracts.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2011.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. and Sarkar, D. 2009. Biology of kyllinga species. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 63:104–105.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C., Sarkar, D., and Riego, D. 2006. Activity of sulfosulfuron in controlling yellow nutsedge and quackgrass. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:86.Google Scholar
Brecke, B. J. and Unruh, J. B. 2000. CGA-362622 for torpedograss (Panicum repens) and purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) control in bermudagrass. Proc. South. Weed Sci. 53:228.Google Scholar
Brown, H. M. 1990. Mode of action, crop selectivity, and soil relations of the sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 29:263–281.Google Scholar
Bryson, C. T., Carter, R., McCarty, L. B., and Yelverton, F. H. 1997. Kyllinga, a genus of neglected weeds in the continental United States. Weed Technol. 11:838–842.Google Scholar
Christopher, J. T., Powels, S. R., and Holtum, J. A. 1992. Resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) involves at least two mechanisms. Plant Physiol. 100:1909–1913.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds; Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Koog, H. J. Jr., inventor; E. I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, assignee. 1966 Sep 15. Deutsche gold and silber scheidean-stalt vormals. Netherlands patent 121,788.Google Scholar
Levitt, G., inventor; E. I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, assignee. 1983 Aug 16. Herbicidal thiophenesulfonamides. U.S. patent 4,398,939.Google Scholar
Mitra, S. 2005. SU herbicides control weeds, Poa in advance of overseeding program. Pages 72–76 in Turfgrass Trends, October. Cleveland, OH Golfdom.Google Scholar
Mitra, S., Bhowmik, P. C., and Umeda, K. 2007. Weed management practices for a successful overseeding and spring transition. Pages 95–113 in Pessarakli, M. D., ed. Handbook of Turfgrass Management and Physiology. Boca Raton, FL CRC.Google Scholar
Porterfield, D., Wilcut, J. W., and Askew, S. D. 2002. Weed management with CGA-362622, fluometuron, and prometryn in cotton. Weed Sci. 50:642–647.Google Scholar
Sarmah, A. K., Kookana, R. S., Duffy, M. J., Alston, A. M., and Harch, B. D. 2000. Hydrolysis of triasulfuron, metsulfuron-methyl and chlorosulfuron in alkaline soil and aqueous solutions. Pest Manag Sci. 56:463–471.Google Scholar
Sauers, R. F. and Levitt, G. 1984. Sulfonylurea synthesis. Pages 21 in Magee, P. S., Kohn, G. K., and Mean, J. J., eds. Pesticide Synthesis through Rational Approaches. Washington, DC American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
Senseman, S. A. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. 9th ed. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. C. 1987. The genera of Cyperaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 68:361–445.Google Scholar
Umeda, K. and Towers, G. 2004. Comparison of sulfonylurea herbicides for spring transition. In: 2004 Turfgrass and Ornamental Research Report, University of Arizona College of Agriculture. http://cals.arizona.edu/pubs/crops/az1359/. Accessed February 12, 2011.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Waltz, C. and Murphy, T. R. 2004. Low use rates are the future for sulfonylurea herbicides: background and basics. Turfgrass Trends Online January 1.Google Scholar
Yelverton, F. 1996. Know your sedges. Golf Course Manag. 64:56–60.Google Scholar
Yelverton, F. 2003. A new herbicide for weeds in bermudagrass and zoysiagrass. Golf Course Manag. 71:119–122.Google Scholar
Yelverton, F. 2004. New weed control in warm-season grasses. Golf Course Manag. 71:203–206.Google Scholar