Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:55:06.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactions Between Primisulfuron and Selected Soil-Applied Insecticides in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Darrin L. Biediger ,
Paul A. Baumann ,
Dave N. Weaver ,
James M. Chandler  and
Morris G. Merkle
Darrin L. Biediger
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Ext. Serv., College Station, Texas A&M Univ. College Station, TX. 77843-2474
Paul A. Baumann
Affiliation:
Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, Assoc. Dep. Head, Texas A&M Univ. College Station, TX. 77843-2474
Dave N. Weaver
Affiliation:
Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, Assoc. Dep. Head, Texas A&M Univ. College Station, TX. 77843-2474
James M. Chandler
Affiliation:
Soil and Crop Sci. Dep., Texas A&M Univ. College Station, TX. 77843-2474
Morris G. Merkle
Affiliation:
Soil and Crop Sci. Dep., Texas A&M Univ. College Station, TX. 77843-2474
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at two locations in 1989 and 1990 to investigate possible interactions between POST applications of primisulfuron and selected soil-applied carbamate and organophosphate corn insecticides. Insecticides were applied in-furrow at planting, at recommended use rates. Primisulfuron was applied POST to corn in the three- or five-leaf stage at 0, 20, 40, or 80 g ai ha-1. Combinations of primisulfuron with disulfoton, fonofos, isozophos, or terbufos resulted in foliar and root injury, plant height reductions, and yield losses. No foliar or root injury, plant height reductions, or yield losses were observed from combinations of primisulfuron and carbaryl, carbofuran, chlorpyrifos, or diazinon. Differences among and within the experiments are attributed to edaphic and environmental conditions at the time of primisulfuron application.

Keywords

Primisulfuron, 2-[[[[[4,6-bis(difluoromethoxy)-2-pyrimidinyl] amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid methyl estercarbaryl, 1-naphthyl methylcarbamatecarbofuran, 2,3-dihydro-2,2-dimethyl-benzofuran-7-yl-methylcarbamatechlorpyrifos, O,O-diethyl O-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl phosphorothioatediazinon, O,O-diethyl O-(2-isopropyl-6-methyl-4-pyrimidinyl)phosphorothioatedisulfoton, O,O-diethyl S-(2-(ethylthio)-ethyl)phosphorodithioatefonofos, O-ethyl S-phenyl ethylphosphonodithioateisozophos, O-(5-chloro-1-[1-methyl ethyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl) O,O-diethyl phosphorothioateterbufos, S-[(tert-butylthio)methyl]-O,O-diethyl phosphorodithioatecorn Zea mays L. ‘D & PL G4673A’Synergismcarbarylcarbofuranchlorpyrifosdiazinondisulfotonfonofosisozophosterbufos
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 807 - 812
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bingham, S. W. and Upchurch, R. P. 1959. Some interactions between nutrient level (N, P, K, Ca) and diuron in the growth of cotton and Italian ryegrass. Weeds 7:167–177.Google Scholar
2. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Flint, J. L., Cornelious, P. L., and Barrett, M. 1988. Analyzing herbicide interactions: a statistical treatment of Colby's method. Weed Technol. 2:304–309.Google Scholar
4. Freeman, J. A. 1978. Evidence of a phytotoxic interaction between the herbicide Eradicane and the insecticide fonofos in sweet corn. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, New York. 680 p.Google Scholar
6. Hacskaylo, J., Walker, J. K. Jr., and Pires, E. G. 1964. Response of cotton seedlings to combinations of preemergence herbicides and systemic insecticides. Weeds 12:288–291.Google Scholar
7. Hammond, R. B. 1983. Pesticide interactions on soybeans. Ohio Report. 70:11–12.Google Scholar
8. Hammond, R. B. 1983. Phytotoxicity of soybean caused by the interaction of insecticide-nematicides and metribuzin. J. Econ. Entomol. 76:17–19.Google Scholar
9. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
10. Hayes, R. M., Yeargan, K. V., Witt, W. W., and Raney, H. G. 1979. Interaction of selected insecticide-herbicide combinations on soybeans (Glycine max L. Merr.). Weed Sci. 27:51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Holshouser, D. L., Chandler, J. M., and Smith, H. R. 1991. The influence of terbufos on the response of five corn (Zea mays) cultivars to CGA-136872. Weed Technol. 5:165–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Ketchersid, M. L., Chandler, J. M., and Merkle, M. G. 1989, Factors affecting the phytotoxicity of CGA-136872 to corn. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 42:271.Google Scholar
13. Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1977. Effect of atrazine on soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 25:115–121.Google Scholar
14. Lentz, G. L., Hayes, R. M., and Chambers, A. Y. 1985. Interactions of insecticides-nematicides, metribuzin, and environment on soybean injury and yield. J. Econ. Entomol. 78:1217–1221.Google Scholar
15. Nash, R. G. 1967. Phytotoxic pesticide interactions in soil. Agron. J. 59:227–230.Google Scholar
16. Nash, R. G. 1968. Synergistic phytotoxicities of herbicide-insecticide combinations in soil. Weed Sci. 16:74–77.Google Scholar
17. Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J., and Benson, G. O. 1986. How a corn plant develops. Special Report No. 48. Iowa State Univ. of Sci. and Technol., Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
18. Waldrop, D. D. and Banks, P. A. 1983. Interactions of herbicides with insecticides in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 31:730–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar