Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T03:23:11.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating fall and spring herbicides with a cereal rye cover crop for horseweed (Conyza canadensis) management prior to soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2019

Austin D. Sherman ,
Erin R. Haramoto Open the ORCID record for Erin R. Haramoto [Opens in a new window]  and
J. D. Green
Austin D. Sherman
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
Erin R. Haramoto*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
J. D. Green
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Erin R. Haramoto, Assistant Professor, University of Kentucky, 1405 Veterans Drive, Lexington, KY, 40546. (E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Horseweed is one of Kentucky’s most common and problematic weeds in no-till soybean production systems. Emergence in the fall and spring necessitates control at these times because horseweed is best managed when small. Control is typically achieved through herbicides or cover crops (CCs); integrating these practices can lead to more sustainable weed management. Two years of field experiments were conducted over 2016 to 2017 and 2017 to 2018 in Versailles, KY, to examine the use of fall herbicide (FH; namely, saflufenacil or none), spring herbicide (SH; namely, 2,4-D; dicamba; or none), and CC (namely, cereal rye or none) for horseweed management prior to soybean. Treatments were examined with a fully factorial design to assess potential interactions. The CC biomass in 2016 to 2017 was higher relative to 2017 to 2018 and both herbicide programs reduced winter weed biomass in that year. The CC reduced horseweed density while growing and after termination in 1 yr. The FH reduced horseweed density through mid-spring. The FH also killed winter weeds that may have suppressed horseweed emergence; higher horseweed density resulted by soybean planting unless the CC was present to suppress the additional spring emergence. If either FH or CC was used, SH typically did not result in additional horseweed control. The SH killed emerged plants but did not provide residual control of a late horseweed flush in 2017 to 2018. These results suggest CCs can help manage spring flushes of horseweed emergence when nonresidual herbicide products are used, though this effect was short-lived when less CC biomass was present.

Keywords

2,4-Ddicambasaflufenacilhorseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.cereal rye, Secale cereale L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrIntegrated weed management
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 64 - 72
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: William Johnson, Purdue University

References

Anonymous (2014) Sharpen® herbicide product label. BASF Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC Google Scholar
Baraibar, B, Hunter, MC, Schipanski, ME, Hamilton, A, Mortensen, D (2018) Weed suppression in cover crop monocultures and mixtures. Weed Sci 66:121–133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco-Canqui, H, Shaver, TM, Lindquist, JL, Shapiro, CA, Elmore, RW, Francis, CA, Hergert, GW (2015) Cover crop and ecosystem services: insights from studies in temperate soils. Agron J 107:2449–2474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolte, JD (2015) Emergence and Control of Horseweed (Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq). MS thesis. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri. 157 pGoogle Scholar
Brainard, DC, Bakker, J, Noyes, DC, Myers, N (2012) Rye living mulch effects on soil moisture and weeds in asparagus. HortSci 47:58–63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, JA, Kells, JJ (1990) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soybeans (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 4:642–647 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byker, HP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB (2013) Control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with dicamba applied preplant and postemergence in dicamba-resistant soybean. Weed Technol 27:492–496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cholette, TB, Soltani, N, Hooker, DC, Robinson, DE, Sikkema, PH (2018) Suppression of glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane (Conyza canadensis) in corn with cover crops seeded after wheat harvest the previous year. Weed Technol 32:244–250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, CD, Bradley, KW (2017) Influence of various cover crop species on winter and summer annual weed emergence in soybean. Weed Technol 31:503–513 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Gibson, KD, Bauman, TT, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2007) Influence of weed management practices and crop rotation on glyphosate-resistant horseweed population dynamics and crop yield. Weed Sci 55:508–516 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Johnson, WG (2008) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) emergence, survival, and fecundity, in no-till soybeans. Weed Sci 56:231–236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Gibson, KD, Bauman, TT, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2009) Influence of weed management practices and crop rotation on glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) population dynamics and crop yield – years III and IV. Weed Sci 57: 417–426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Kruger, GR, Young, BG, Johnson, WG (2010) Fall and spring preplant herbicide applications influence spring emergence of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technol 24:11–19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haramoto, ER (2019) Species, seeding rate, and planting method influence cover crop services prior to soybean. Agron J 111: 1068–1078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haramoto, ER, Brainard, DC (2017) Spatial and temporal variability in Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii) emergence under strip tillage with cover crop residue. Weed Sci 65:151–163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haramoto, ER, Sherman, AD, Green, JD (2019) 2,4-D Deposition is reduced and more variable immediately adjacent to cereal rye cover crop rows [published online ahead of print August 23, 2019]. Weed Technol DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.82 Google Scholar
Hasty, RF, Sprague, CL, Hager, AG (2004) Weed control with fall and early-preplant herbicide applications in no-till soybean. Weed Technol 18:887–892 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, ZD, Brainard, DC, Henshaw, B, Ngouajio, M (2012) Winter annual weed suppression in rye–vetch cover crop mixtures. Weed Technol 26:818–825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, IM (2019) The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: July 9, 2019Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M, Brule-Babel, AL, Morrison, IN (1996) The evolution and genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Sci 44:176–193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legleiter, TR, Green, JD (2019) Investigation of Conyza canadensis control in Kentucky no-till soybean across three herbicide resistant soybean varieties. 59th Annual Meeting of the Weed Science Society of America, February 11–14, New Orleans, LA. Paper 220Google Scholar
Loux, M, Johnson, WG (2010) Control of marestail in no-till soybeans. Purdue University Extension & Ohio State University Extension. https://ag.purdue.edu/btny/weedscience/Documents/marestail%20fact%202014%20latest.pdf. Accessed: August 1, 2018Google Scholar
Main, CL, Steckel, LE, Hayes, RM, Mueller, TC (2006) Biotic and abiotic factors influence horseweed emergence. Weed Sci 54:1101–1105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J (2013) Marestail may challenge wheat growers this fall. Wheat Science News 17. University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service. https://wheatscience.ca.uky.edu/files/sept2092c20201320newsletter.pdf. Accessed: December 20, 2019Google Scholar
Martin, J, Green, JD (2016) Weed control recommendations for Kentucky grain crops. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Food and Environment Cooperative Extension Service, Publication 82Google Scholar
Maxwell, B, Roush, ML, Radosevich, SR (1990) Predicting the evolution and dynamics of herbicide resistance in weed populations. Weed Technol 4:2–13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellendorf, TG, Young, JM, Matthews, JL, Young, BG (2013) Influence of plant height and glyphosate on saflufenacil efficacy on glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technol 27:463–467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandula, VK, Eubank, TW, Poston, DH, Koger, CH, Reddy, KN (2006) Factors affecting germination of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 54:898–902 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60(sp1):31–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regehr, DL, Bazzaz, FA (1979) The population dynamics of Erigeron canadensis, a successional winter annual. J Ecol 3:923–933 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Steckel, LE, Stephenson, DO IV, Eubank, TW, Scott, RC (2013) Assessment of weed management practices and problem weeds in the midsouth United States-soybean: a consultant’s perspective. Weed Technol 27:612–622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, MR, Mirsky, SB, Mortensen, DA, Teasdale, JR, Curran, WS (2011) Potential synergistic effects of cereal rye biomass and soybean planting density on weed suppression. Weed Sci 59:238–246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarrantonio, M, Gallandt, ER (2003) The role of cover crops in North American cropping systems. J Crop Prod 8:53–74 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, EJ, Dauer, JT, VanGessel, MJ, Neumann, G (2006) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed collected in the planetary boundary layer. Weed Sci 54:1063–1067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, JR, Mohler, CL (2000) The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches. Weed Sci 48:385–392 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tozzi, E, Van Acker, RC (2014) Effects of seedling emergence timing on the population dynamics of horseweed (Conyza canadensis var. canadensis ) Weed Sci 62:451–456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, MJ (2001) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci 49:703–705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wychen, L (2016) 2016 Survey of the Most Common and Troublesome Weeds in Broadleaf Crops, Fruits & Vegetables in the United States and Canada. Weed Science Society of America National Weed Survey Dataset. http://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/2016-Weed-Survey_Broadleaf-crops.xlsx. Accessed: July 9, 2019Google Scholar
Vollmer, KM, VanGessel, MJ, Johnson, QR, Scott, BA (2019) Preplant and residual herbicide application timings for weed control in no-till soybean. Weed Technol 33:166–172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, JM, Curran, WS, Mortensen, DA (2019) Cover crop effects on horseweed (Erigeron Canadensis) density and size inequality at the time of herbicide exposure. Weed Sci 67:327–338 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM, Simmons, DB, Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Bridges, DC, Scully, BT (2016) Factors affecting potential for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) suppression by winter rye in Georgia, USA. Field Crops Res 192: 103–109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, MS, Reberg-Horton, SC, Smith, SN, Grossman, JM (2013) The reduction of plant-available nitrogen by cover crop mulches and subsequent effects on soybean performance and weed interference. Agron J 105: 539–545 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werle, R, Burr, C, Blanco-Canqui, H (2017) Cereal rye cover crop suppresses winter annual weeds. Can J Plant Sci 8:498–500 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Sherman et al. Supplementary Materials

Sherman et al. Supplementary Materials

Download Sherman et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 18.4 KB