Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:22:54.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Influence of Weed Management in Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Stubble on Weed Control in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Theodore M. Webster
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691
John Cardina
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691
Mark M. Loux
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine how the timing of weed management treatments in winter wheat stubble affects weed control the following season and to determine if spring herbicide rates in corn can be reduced with appropriately timed stubble management practices. Field studies were conducted at two sites in Ohio between 1993 and 1995. Wheat stubble treatments consisted of glyphosate (0.84 kg ae/ha) plus 2,4-D (0.48 kg ae/ha) applied in July, August, or September, or at all three timings, and a nontreated control. In the following season, spring herbicide treatments consisted of a full rate of atrazine (1.7 kg ai/ha) plus alachlor (2.8 kg ai/ha) preemergence, a half rate of these herbicides, or no spring herbicide treatment. Across all locations, a postharvest treatment of glyphosate plus 2,4-D followed by alachlor plus atrazine at half or full rates in the spring controlled all broadleaf weeds, except giant ragweed, at least 88%. Giant foxtail control at three locations was at least 83% when a postharvest glyphosate plus 2,4-D treatment was followed by spring applications of alachlor plus atrazine at half or full rates. Weed control in treatments without alachlor plus atrazine was variable, although broadleaf control from July and August glyphosate plus 2,4-D applications was greater than from September applications. Where alachlor and atrazine were not applied, August was generally the best timing of herbicide applications to wheat stubble for reducing weed populations the following season.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Hoefer, R. H., Wicks, G. A., and Burnside, O. C. 1981. Grain yields, soil water storage, and weed growth in a winter wheat–corn–fallow rotation. Agron. J. 73:10671071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loux, M. M., Stachler, J. M., and Harrison, S. K. 1998. Weed Control Guide for Ohio Field Crops. Ohio State University Extension Bulletin 789. 136 p.Google Scholar
Ramsel, R. E. and Wicks, G. A. 1988. Use of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and herbicides in aiding in weed control in an ecofallow corn (Zea mays) rotation. Weed Sci. 36:394398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. 1995. Influence of narrow row/high population corn (Zea mays) on weed control and light transmittance. Weed Technol. 9:113118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vander Vorst, P. B., Wicks, G. A., and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Weed control in a winter wheat–corn–ecofarming rotation. Agron. J. 75:507511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, G. A. 1986. Herbicide applications on wheat stubble for no-tillage corn. Agron. J. 78:843848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Popken, D. H., and Lowry, S. L. 1989. Survey of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) stubble fields sprayed with herbicides after harvest in 1986. Weed Technol. 3:244254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar