Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:56:31.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Selected Fungicides on Efficacy of Clethodim and Sethoxydim

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sarah H. Lancaster ,
David L. Jordan ,
Alan C. York ,
Ian C. Burke ,
Frederick T. Corbin ,
Yvonna S. Sheldon ,
John W. Wilcut  and
David W. Monks
Sarah H. Lancaster
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
David L. Jordan*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Alan C. York
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Ian C. Burke
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Frederick T. Corbin
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Yvonna S. Sheldon
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7609, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to compare large crabgrass control by clethodim or sethoxydim applied alone and with selected fungicides registered for use in peanut. Fluazinam, propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin, or tebuconazole did not affect efficacy of clethodim or sethoxydim. Azoxystrobin, boscalid, chlorothalonil, and pyraclostrobin reduced efficacy of clethodim and sethoxydim in some experiments. Increasing the herbicide rate increased large crabgrass control regardless of the addition of chlorothalonil. In laboratory experiments, 14C absorption was less when 14C-clethodim or 14C-sethoxydim was applied with chlorothalonil. Pyraclostrobin and tebuconazole did not affect absorption of 14C-clethodim or 14C-sethoxydim.

Keywords

Azoxystrobin, methyl (E)-2-[2-[6-(2-cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin-4-yloxy]phenyl]-3-methoxyacrylateboscalid, 3-pyridinecarboxamide,2-chloro-N-[4′-chloro(1,1′-biphenyl)-2-yl]chlorothalonil, tetrachloroisophthalonitrileclethodimfluazinam, 3-chloro-N-[3-chloro-2,6-dinitro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinaminepropiconazole, 1-[2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-propyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl-methyl]-1H-1,2,4triazolepyraclostrobin, carbamic acid,[2-[[[1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3yl]oxy]methyl]phenyl]methoxy-, methyl estersethoxydimtebuconazole, α-[2-(4-chlorophenyl)ethyl]-α-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-ethanoltrifloxystrobin, benzeneacetic acid, α-(methoxyimino)-2-[[[(E)-[1-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]ethylidene]amino]oxy]methyl]-, methylester (E,E)large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSApeanut, Arachis hypogaea L.Herbicide absorptionpesticide interactionLSS, liquid scintillation spectrometry
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 397 - 403
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2002a. Post product label. Research Triangle Park, NC: BASF Corporation Agricultural Products. 18 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002b. Select 2EC product label. Walnut Creek, CA: Valent U.S.A. Corporation. 20 p.Google Scholar
Burke, I. C. and Wilcut, J. W. 2003. Physiological basis for antagonism of clethodim by imazapic on goosegrass [Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn]. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 76:37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, J. D. and York, A. C. 1988. Interactions of carbaryl and dimethoate with sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 2:433–436.Google Scholar
Carlson, D., Zorner, P., Evans, R., Gourd, D., and Hazer, J. 1989. The influence of DASH adjuvant on the efficacy of sethoxydim. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 29:23.Google Scholar
Clewis, S. B., Askew, S. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Economic assessment of diclosulam and flumioxazion in strip- and conventional-tillage peanut. Weed Sci. 50:378–385.Google Scholar
Clough, J. M. and Godfrey, C. R. A. 1998. The strobilurin fungicides. in Hutson, D. and Miyamoto, J., eds. Fungicidal Activity Chemical and Biological Approaches to Plant Protection. New York: J. Wiley. Pp. 109–148.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Corbin, F. T., and Sheldon, Y. S. 1999a. Influence of adjuvants and bromoxynil on absorption of clethodim. Weed Technol. 13:536–541.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Jennings, K. M., and Batts, R. B. 1998. Interaction of bromoxynil and postemergence graminicides on large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis). Weed Technol. 12:554–559.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Jordan, D. L., Corbin, F. T., and Sheldon, Y. S. 1999b. Basis for antagonism in mixtures of bromoxynil plus quizalofop-P applied to yellow foxtail (Setaria glauca). Weed Technol. 13:515–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falb, L. N., Bridges, D. C., and Smith, A. E. Jr. 1990. Effects of adjuvants and pH on clethodim photodegradation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 38:875–878.Google Scholar
Ferreira, K. L., Burton, J. D., and Coble, H. D. 1995. Physiological basis for antagonism of fluazifop-P by DPX-PE350. Weed Sci. 43:184–191.Google Scholar
Ferreira, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1994. Effect of DPX-PE350 on the efficacy of graminicides. Weed Sci. 42:222–226.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J., Besler, B. A., Brewer, K. D., and Baughman, T. A. 2002. Grass control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with clethodim and selected broadleaf herbicide combinations. Peanut Sci. 29:85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, W. J. and Boswell, T. E. 1987. Herbicide combinations in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 1:290–293.Google Scholar
Holshouser, D. L. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Compatibility of sethoxydim with five postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:128–133.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 2004. Weed management in peanuts. in 2004 Peanut Information. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension Service Series AG-331. Pp. 33–53().Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Culpepper, A. S., Grichar, W. J., Tredaway-Ducar, J., Brecke, B. J., and York, A. C. 2003. Weed control with combinations of selected fungicides and herbicides applied postemergence to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). Peanut Sci. 30:1–8.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993. Interactions of DPX-PE350 with fluazifop-P, sethoxydim, clethodim, and quizalofop-P. Weed Technol. 7:605–610.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., and Corbin, F. T. 1989. Effect of ammonium sulfate and bentazon on sethoxydim absorption. Weed Technol. 3:674–677.Google Scholar
Prostko, E. P., Johnson, W. C. III, and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 2001. Annual grass control with preplant incorporated and preemergence applications of ethalfluralin and pendimethalin in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 15:36–41.Google Scholar
Shew, B. 2004. Peanut disease management. in 2004 Peanut Information. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension Service Series AG-331. Pp. 73–96.Google Scholar
Uesugi, Y. 1998. Fungicide classes: chemistry, uses and mode of action. in Hutson, D. and Miyamoto, J., eds. Fungicidal Activity Chemical and Biological Approaches to Plant Protection. New York: J. Wiley. Pp. 23–56.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Reynolds, D. B., and Blouin, D. C. 1995. Grass control in soybean (Glycine max) with graminicides applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol. 9:68–72.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2001. Weed survey—Southern States. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:249–259.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., Grichar, W. J., and Wehtje, G. R. 1995. The biology and management of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). in Pattee, H. E. and Stalker, H. T., eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK: American Peanut Research and Education Society. Pp. 207–224.Google Scholar