Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:30:37.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Herbicide and Application Timing on Blackberry Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

J. A. Ferrell ,
B. A. Sellers ,
G. E. MacDonald  and
W. N. Kline
J. A. Ferrell*
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
B. A. Sellers
Affiliation:
Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Ona, FL 33865
G. E. MacDonald
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
W. N. Kline
Affiliation:
Dow AgroSciences, Duluth, GA 30096
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Blackberry is a troublesome species across much of the southeastern United States. Control of blackberry with the pyridine herbicides is often variable among different locations. Experiments were conducted to determine whether application timing, either spring or fall, affected efficacy of the pyridine herbicides triclopyr, fluroxypyr and picloram, and metsulfuron. The pyridine herbicides provided greater control when applied in the fall. At 12 mo after treatment, fluroxypyr plus picloram and fluroxypyr plus triclopyr provided 83% control when applied in the fall and 65% when applied in the spring. Conversely, metsulfuron provided 85% control, and application timing was not significant. Although metsulfuron effectively controls blackberry, it is also highly injurious to bahiagrass. Therefore, chlorosulfuron was tested to determine whether it would provide blackberry control while not injuring bahiagrass. Blackberry control with chlorosulfuron was similar to metsulfuron. These data indicated blackberry control in bahiagrass pastures can be effectively accomplished with chlorosulfuron.

Keywords

Chlorosulfuronfluroxypyrmetsulfuronpicloramtriclopyrblackberry, Rubus sppbahiagrass, Paspalum notatum Flüggé, ‘Pensacola’Pasturebrushperennial weed
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 531 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Amor, R. L. 1973. Ecology and control of blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.). I. Rubus spp. as weeds in Victoria. Weed Res 13:218–223.Google Scholar
Amor, R. L. 1974a. Ecology and control of blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.). II. Reproduction. Weed Res 14:231–238.Google Scholar
Amor, R. L. 1974b. Ecology and control of blackberry (Rubus fruticosus L. agg.). III. Response of R. procerus to mechanical removal of topgrowth and to foliage applied herbicides. Weed Res 14:239–243.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 2009. Telar XP herbicide product label. DuPont Publication No. H-65619. Wilmington, DE: DuPont. 3.Google Scholar
Bunnell, B. T., Baker, R. D., McCarty, L. B., Hall, D. W., and Colvin, D. L. 2003. Differential response of five bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) cultivars to metsulfuron. Weed Technol 17:550–553.Google Scholar
Cole, E. C., Newton, M., and White, D. E. 1988. Efficacy of imazapyr and metsulfuron methyl for site preparation and conifer release in the Oregon coast range. Corvallis, OR. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University Research Note 81.Google Scholar
Cornwell, M. J. and Christie, M. S. 1984. Preliminary results with DPX-T6376 for control of gorse and blackberry. Proc. N. Z. Weed Pest. Conf 37:197–199.Google Scholar
Crouchley, G. 1983. Blackberry control in Hawkes Bay. Proc. Ruakura Farmers Conf 35:63–65.Google Scholar
Dellow, J. J., Mitchell, T., Johnston, W., Hennessey, G., and Gray, P. 1987. Large area blackberry, Rubus fruticosus agg., control using grazing goats. Proc. Aust. Weeds Conf 8:70.Google Scholar
Dempsey, G. P. 1981. The failure of fosamine and glyphosate to give long-term control of blackberry in Northland. Proc. N. Z. Weed Pest. Conf 34:152–155.Google Scholar
Forgie, C. D., Lobb, P. G., and Dryden, P. J. 1981. A comparison of picloram/triclopyr mixture with other herbicides for blackberry control. Proc. N. Z. Weed Pest. Conf 34:148–151.Google Scholar
Forgie, C. D., Saunders, D. G., and MacDiarmid, B. N. 1977. Blackberry control with triclopyr. Proc. N. Z. Weed Pest. Conf 30:71–75.Google Scholar
Kalmbacher, R. S. and Eger, J. E. 1994. Determining field recommendations for control of sand blackberry with triclopyr. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla. Proc 53:64–69.Google Scholar
Matthews, L. J. 1951. Chemical control of blackberry. Proc. N. Z. Nat. Weeds Conf 4:13–15.Google Scholar
McCarty, L. B., Colvin, D. L., and Higgins, J. M. 1996. Highbush blackberry (Rubus argutus) control in bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum). Weed Technol 10:754–761.Google Scholar
Northcroft, E. G. 1927. The blackberry pest. I. The biology of the plant. N. Z. J. Agric 34:376–388.Google Scholar
Oehrens, E. 1977. Biological control of the blackberry through the introduction of rust, Phragmidium violaceum in Chile. FAO Plant Prot. Bull 25:26–28.Google Scholar
Popay, I. and Field, R. 1996. Grazing animals as weed control agents. Weed Technol 10:217–231.Google Scholar
Shannon, P. W. and Leslie, J. M. 1982. Chemical control of blackberry in Northland. Proc. N. Z. Weed Pest. Conf 35:166–168.Google Scholar