Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:32:40.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of AE F130060 03 Application Timing on Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William A. Bailey ,
Henry P. Wilson  and
Thomas E. Hines
William A. Bailey
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech, Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, 33446 Research Drive, Painter, VA 23420
Henry P. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech, Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, 33446 Research Drive, Painter, VA 23420
Thomas E. Hines
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech, Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, 33446 Research Drive, Painter, VA 23420
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in Virginia in 2000 and 2001 to investigate responses of winter wheat and diclofop-sensitive and -resistant Italian ryegrass to the experimental herbicide mixture AE F130060 03 and crop safener AE F107892 applied postemergence. AE F130060 03 at 15 or 18 g ai/ha with or without methylated seed oil controlled both diclofop-sensitive and -resistant Italian ryegrass 82 to 99% and reduced inflorescence emergence 59 to 98%. Although AE F130060 03 controlled existing Italian ryegrass 4 wk after any application, timing of application influenced late-season Italian ryegrass control and inflorescence emergence. Applications to two- to three-leaf Italian ryegrass resulted in greater emergence of Italian ryegrass after application than applications made to two- to three-tiller or four- to five-tiller Italian ryegrass. Wheat injury by AE F130060 03 was greater than injury from diclofop, but wheat appeared to fully recover; and yields from AE F130060 03–treated wheat were similar to yields of diclofop-treated wheat and at least 21% greater than yields from nontreated wheat. In greenhouse experiments, differential growth responses between diclofop-sensitive and -resistant Italian ryegrass occurred after AE F130060 03 application at normal (15 g ai/ha) and below-normal application rates. When rates were increased beyond normal application rates, growth responses were similar between diclofop-sensitive and -resistant Italian ryegrass.

Keywords

AE F130060 03 (8.3:1.7 mixture of AE F130060 00, proposed common name mesosulfuron-methyl, 2-[(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl carbamoyl)sulfamoyl]-4-methanesulfonamido-p-toluic acid, plus AE F115008 00, proposed common name iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium, 4-iodo-2-[3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)ureidosulfonyl]benzoic acid)AE F107892, proposed common name mefenpyr-diethyl, 1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-5-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3,5-dicarboxylic aciddiclofopItalian ryegrass, Lolium multiflorum Lam. LOLMU #3winter wheat, Triticum aestivum. L. ‘Pioneer 2643’, ‘Pioneer 26R24’, ‘Pocohontas’Diclofop resistanceresistance managementACCase, acetyl coenzyme A carboxylaseALS, acetolactate synthaseMSO, methylated seed oilPOST, postemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 842 - 853
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, M., Bertges, W., Hicks, C., Luff, K., Hoobler, M., Maruska, D., Paulsgrove, M., and Thorsness, K. 2002. The use of AE F130060 herbicide for grass control in wheat. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr 42:76.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002a. National Agricultural Statistics Service. Published Estimates Database for Winter Wheat. Web page: http://www.nass.usda.gov. Accessed: June 1, 2002.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002b. Mesomaxx Technical Bulletin. Lyon, France: Aventis CropScience S.A. 28 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002c. Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium Technical Bulletin. Lyon, France: Aventis CropScience S.A. 32 p.Google Scholar
Appleby, A. P. and Brewster, B. D. 1992. Seeding arrangement on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain yield and interaction with Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Technol. 6:820–823.Google Scholar
Appleby, A. P., Olsen, P. O., and Colbert, D. R. 1976. Winter wheat yield reduction from interference by Italian ryegrass. Agron. J. 68:463–466.Google Scholar
Bailey, W. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2002. Mesosulfuron/iodosulfuron (AE F130060) for Italian ryegrass control in VA wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 55:21–22.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A., Klepper, B., and Rydrych, D. J. 1995. Comparative above-ground developmental rates for several annual grass weeds and cereal grains. Weed Sci. 43:410–416.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. and Harker, K. N. 1996. Growth stage and broadleaf herbicide effects on CGA 184927 efficacy. Weed Technol. 10:732–737.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L., Kenkel, N. C., and Morrison, I. N. 1997. Characterization of cross-resistance patterns in acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitor resistant wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 45:750–755.Google Scholar
Bravin, F., Zanin, G., and Preston, C. 2001. Diclofop-methyl resistance in populations of Lolium spp. from central Italy. Weed Res. 41:49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrill, L. C. and Appleby, A. P. 1978. Influence of Italian ryegrass density on efficacy of diuron herbicide. Agron. J. 70:505–506.Google Scholar
Cocker, K. M., Northcroft, D. S., Coleman, J. O. D., and Moss, S. R. 2001. Resistance to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides and isoproturon in UK populations of Lolium multiflorum: mechanisms of resistance and implications for control. Pestic. Manag. Sci 57:587–597.Google Scholar
Crooks, H. L. and York, A. C. 2002. Italian ryegrass control in wheat with mesosulfuron-methyl. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 55:22–23.Google Scholar
Frans, R. R., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. in Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science, 3rd edition. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. Pp. 37–38.Google Scholar
Hand, S. S., Smith, T. L., Sanderson, J., Barr, G., Strachan, F., and Paulsgrove, M. 2002. AE F130060—a new selective herbicide for grass control in wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 55:142–143.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N. and Blackshaw, R. E. 1991. Influence of growth stage and broadleaf herbicides on tralkoxydim activity. Weed Sci. 39:650–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker, K. N. and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1991. Effect of imazamethabenz on different growth stages of green foxtail, tartary buckwheat and wild oat. Can. J. Plant Sci 71:821–829.Google Scholar
Hashem, A., Radosevich, S. R., and Roush, M. L. 1998. Effect of proximity factors on competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 46:181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, W. L. 1997. Safeners and plant growth regulators. in Bryant, R. and Kilmer, J., eds. Global Herbicide Directory. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Ag. Information Services. 26 p.Google Scholar
Ketchersid, M. L. and Bridges, D. C. 1987. Factors affecting the toxicity of flurtamone to sorghum. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 40:343.Google Scholar
Kocher, H. 1984. Mode of action of the wild oat herbicide diclofop. Can. Plains Proc. 12, Wild Oat Symposium 2:63–77.Google Scholar
Kuchuran, M. and Beckie, H. J. 2000. Cross-resistance pattern in biotypes of ACCase inhibitor-resistant wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr 40:32.Google Scholar
Liebl, R. A. and Worsham, A. D. 1987a. Effect of chlorsulfuron on diclofop phytotoxicity to Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 35:383–387.Google Scholar
Liebl, R. A. and Worsham, A. D. 1987b. Interference of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 35:819–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, I. N. and Maurice, D. C. 1984. The relative response of two foxtail (Setaria) species to diclofop. Weed Sci. 32:686–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Fernandez, T. M. and Coble, H. D. 1998. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) response to residual phosphorus levels in winter wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 51:244.Google Scholar
Pillmoor, J. B. and Caseley, J. C. 1984. The influence of growth stage and foliage or soil application on the activity of AC 222,293 against Alopercurus myosuroides and Avena fatua . Ann. Appl. Biol 105:517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, T. B. 1984. Site of action of chlorsulfuron: inhibition of valine and isoleucine synthesis in plants. Plant Physiol 75:827–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, M. M., Warren, G. F., and Orwick, P. L. 1979. Effects of wetting agent, stage of growth, and species on the selectivity of diclofop. Weed Sci. 27:679–683.Google Scholar
Stanger, C. E. and Appleby, A. P. 1989. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) accessions tolerant to diclofop. Weed Sci. 37:350–352.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2000. Weed Survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 53:299–313.Google Scholar