Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:52:00.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Individual Plant Control of Tall Larkspur (Delphinium barbeyi) with Tebuthiuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael H. Ralphs*
Affiliation:
USDA/ARS Poisonous Plant Laboratory, 1150 East 1400 North, Logan, UT 84341
Lee Woolsey
Affiliation:
USDA/NRCS, Filmore, UT
James E. Bowns
Affiliation:
Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

A replicated field trial was conducted to determine the effective rates of tebuthiuron for control of individual tall larkspur plants in the mountains near Emery, UT, Cedar City, UT, and Yampa, CO. The size of larkspur plants was measured, and tebuthiuron was applied to the base of each plant at 0.1, 0.21, and 0.5 g product/1,000 cm2 of foliar crown cover. Tebuthiuron at 0.21 g/ 1,000 cm2 rate controlled 62% of the plants. Tebuthiuron at 0.5 g/1,000 cm controlled 78% of the plants (2.5 g for an average-sized plant of 5,000 cm2). The high clay content of the soils at Emery or high organic matter content of soils at Cedar City or Yampa did not adversely affect efficacy.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baxter, G. 1998. Thinning dense sagebrush stands with Spike 20P. Rangelands. 20:1416.Google Scholar
Cronin, E. H. and Nielsen, D. B. 1972. Controlling tall larkspur on snowdrift areas in the subalpine zone. J. Range Manage. 25:213216.Google Scholar
Duncan, K. W. and Scifres, C. J. 1983. Influence of clay and organic matter of rangeland soils on tebuthiuron effectiveness. J. Range Manage. 36:295297.Google Scholar
Mickelsen, L. V., Ralphs, M. H., Turner, D. L., Evans, J. O., and Dewey, S. A. 1990. Herbicidal control of duncecap larkspur (Delphinium occidentale). Weed Sci. 38:153157.Google Scholar
Pfister, J. A., Gardner, D. R., Panter, K. E., Manners, G. D., Ralphs, M. H., Stegelmeier, B. L., and Schoch, T. K. 1999. Larkspur (Delphinium spp.) poisoning in livestock. J. Nat. Toxins. 8:8194.Google Scholar
Ralphs, M. H. 1995. Long term change in vegetation following herbicide control of larkspur. J. Range Manage. 48:459464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralphs, M. H., Evans, J. O., and Dewey, S. A. 1992. Timing of herbicide applications for control of larkspurs (Delphinium spp). Weed Sci. 40:264269.Google Scholar
Ralphs, M. H., Woolsey, L., and Bowns, J. E. 2003. Mechanism by which ammonium fertilizers kill larkspur. J. Range Manage. 56:524528.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8e. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. 3884 p.Google Scholar
Scifres, C. J., Mutz, J. L., and Hamilton, W. T. 1979. Control of mixed brush with tebuthiuron. J. Range Manage. 32:155158.Google Scholar
Scifres, C. J., Stuth, J. W., and Bovey, R. W. 1981. Control of oaks (Quercus spp.) and associated woody species on rangeland with tebuthiuron. Weed Sci. 29:170174.Google Scholar
VanPelt, N. S. and West, N. E. 1990. Effects of manual application method on application time, thoroughness and tebuthiuron outlays. J. Range Manage. 43:3942.Google Scholar