Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T16:01:35.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Tyta luctuosa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Hedge Bindweed (Calystegia sepium) in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Philip W. Tipping  and
Gaetano Campobasso
Philip W. Tipping
Affiliation:
Maryland Department of Agriculture, Annapolis, MD 21401
Gaetano Campobasso
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS European Biocontrol Laboratory, Rome, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Releasing Tyta luctuosa on hedge bindweed in cornfields did not increase defoliation more than endemic herbivores. Larvae of T. luctuosa were rarely found after release, indicating they suffered high mortality or dispersed from test plants. Eleven species of endemic insects were found feeding on bindweed, all of which are known to be generalists feeding, in some cases, on economically important plants. Oidaematophorus monodactylus (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pterophoridae) was the most damaging species to the bindweed.

Keywords

Tyta luctuosa (Denis and Schiffermuller)hedge bindweed [Calystegia sepium (L.) R. Br.], # CAGSEcorn, Zea mays L.Biological controlendemic insect herbivores
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 1997 , pp. 731 - 733
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Boldt, P. E. and Sobhian, R. 1993. Release and establishment of Aceria malherbae (Acari: Eriophyidae) for control of field bindweed in Texas. Environ. Entomol. 22:234–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciomperlik, M. A., Chandler, J. M., and Deloach, C. J. 1992. Predation by red imported fire ant on Tyta luctuosa, released for control field bindweed. Southwest. Entomol. 17:267–269.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. G. 1976. Control of the bindweeds Convolvulus arvensis and Calystegia septum in fruit crops. Pestic. Sci. 7:429–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, D. D., Senesac, A. F., and Sieczka, J. G. 1986. Results of Long Island hedge bindweed experiments. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:194–198.Google Scholar
Parrella, M. P. and Kok, L. T. 1978. Oidaematophorus monodactylus: oviposition and development on sweet potato and inundative releases on hedge bindweed. Environ. Entomol. 7:803–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, C. F. and Hughes, R. 1970. Selected Weeds of the United States. USDA-ARS Agricultural Handbook No. 366. Washington, DC: USDA. 463 p.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, S. S. and Buckingham, G. R. 1982. Natural enemies of Convolvulus arvensis in western Mediterranean Europe. Hilgardia 50:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, S. S., Clement, S. L., Hostettler, N., and Mimmocchi, T. 1988. Biology of Tyta luctuosa (Lep.: Noctuidae) and its potential value as a biological control agent for the weed Convolvulus arvensis . Entomophaga 33:185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selleck, G. W. 1979. Biological control of hedge bindweed on Long Island. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:114–118.Google Scholar
Wang, R. and Kok, L. T. 1986. Host specificity of Megacerus discoidus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) and its impact on hedge bindweed, Calystegia sepium. Environ. Entomol. 15:834–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, S. E. and Riley, W. R. 1982. The biology of Canadian weeds. 53. Convolvulus arvense L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar