Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:13:23.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imidazolinone-Resistant Sunflower Tolerance to Imazapic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Eric P. Prostko ,
Timothy L. Grey  and
Jerry W. Davis
Eric P. Prostko*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia, 104 Research Way, Tifton, GA 31794
Timothy L. Grey
Affiliation:
Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia, 104 Research Way, Tifton, GA 31794
Jerry W. Davis
Affiliation:
The University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were conducted in Georgia in 2007 to 2008 to evaluate the tolerance of three imidazolinone-resistant sunflower cultivars to POST applications of imazapic. There was no interaction between sunflower cultivar and herbicide treatment. When averaged over sunflower cultivars, imazapic, at 70 and 140 g ai/ha and applied at 30 d after planting, had no effect on sunflower above-ground biomass, plant height, seed-heads per meter row, and seed-head weights. Sunflower response to imazapic was similar to that of imazamox. Imazapic could be used in imidazolinone-resistant sunflower production systems without risk of unacceptable crop injury.

Keywords

Imazamoximazapicsunflower, Helianthus annuus L. ‘Dekalb 3880CL’, ‘Mycogen 8H419CL’, and ‘Mycogen 8N386CL’Clearfield® production systemsherbicide injury
Type
Notes
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 188 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aichele, T. M. and Penner, D. 2005. Adsorption, desorption, and degradation of imidazolinones in soil. Weed Technol 19:154–159.Google Scholar
Al-Khatib, K., Baumgarnter, J. R., Peterson, D. E., and Currie, R. S. 1998. Imazethapyr resistance in common sunflower. Weed Sci 46:403–407.Google Scholar
Al-Khatib, K. and Miller, J. F. 2000. Registration of four genetic stocks of sunflower resistant to imidazolinone herbicides. Crop Sci 40:869–870.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2002. Economic Importance of Hunting in America. Washington, DC: International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. http://www.fishwildlife.org/pdfs/Hunting_Economic_Impact.pdf. Accessed: July 29, 2008.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2007. Dove Hunting and Agricultural Practices in Georgia. Social Circle, GA: Georgia Department of Natural Resources. http://georgiawildlife.dnr.state.ga.us/assets/documents/dove%20Hunting%20and%20Ag%20Practices%208- 07.pdf. Accessed: July 29, 2008.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2008. Beyond® product label. Research Triangle Park, NC: BASF Corp. 19 p.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. 1998. Postemergence weed control in pea (Pisum sativum) with imazamox. Weed Technol 12:64–68.Google Scholar
Endres, G. J. and Schatz, B. G. 2004. Management strategies in imidazolinone-resistant sunflower. Carrington, ND: North Dakota State University Carrington Research. Center Annual Reports. http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/carringt/agronomy/Research/Herbicide/04%20Imi%20SF%20weed%20mgmt.pdf. Accessed: July 29, 2008.Google Scholar
Endres, G. J. and Zollinger, R. 2002. Clearfield sunflower response and weed management with herbicides. Carrington, ND: North Dakota State University Carrington Research. Center Annual Reports. http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/carringt/agronomy/Research/Herbicide/Clearfield%20Sunflower%20Poster.pdf. Accessed: July 29, 2008.Google Scholar
Heiser, J. W., Kendig, J. A., Smith, C. L., Ezell, P. M., and Smeda, R. J. 2005. Comparison of imazethapyr and imazamox as either primary or salvage herbicides in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Proc. N. Central Weed Sci. Soc 60:146.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. and Al-Khatib, K. 2002. Registration of imidazolinone herbicide-resistant sunflower maintainer (HA 425) and fertility restore (RHA 426 and THA 427) germplasms. Crop Sci 42:988–989.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. A., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1998. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with imazamox and imazethapyr. Weed Sci 46:587–594.Google Scholar
Prostko, E. P. 2008. Weed control in sunflowers. Pages 206–207. in. Georgia Pest Management Handbook–Commercial Edition. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Special Bulletin #28.Google Scholar
SAS 2007. SAS OnlineDoc(R)9.1.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Google Scholar
Subrahmanyeswara, R. and Reddy, K. N. 1999. Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) response to glyphosate mixtures and ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technol 13:361–366.Google Scholar
Tan, S., Evans, R. R., Dahmer, M. L., Singh, B. K., and Shaner, D. L. 2005. Imidazolinone- tolerant crops: history, current status, and future. Pest Manage. Sci 61:246–257.Google Scholar
Tredaway-Ducar, J., Wilcut, J. W., and Richburg, J. S. III. 2004. Weed management in imidazolinone-resistant corn with imazapic. Weed Technol 18:1018–1022.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. and Macdonald, G. E. 2001. A survey of weeds in various crops in Georgia. Weed Technol 15:771–790.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M., Wilcut, J. W., and Coble, H. D. 1997. Influence of AC 263,222 rate and application method on weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol 11:520–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, Wiley, G. L., and Walls, F. R. Jr. 1996. Postemergence AC 263,222 systems for weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci 44:615–621.Google Scholar