Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:49:30.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imazethapyr plus Residual Herbicide Programs for Imidazolinone-Resistant Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Eric P. Webster ,
Tyler P. Carlson ,
Michael E. Salassi ,
Justin B. Hensley  and
David C. Blouin
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Tyler P. Carlson
Affiliation:
School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Michael E. Salassi
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 101 Agricultural Administration Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Justin B. Hensley
Affiliation:
School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
David C. Blouin
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 45 Agricultural Administration Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 2008 and 2009 near Crowley, LA to evaluate the addition of a herbicide with soil-residual activity in mixture with imazethapyr applied very early POST followed by an application of imazethapyr or imazamox 2 wk after the initial application. Weeds evaluated included red rice, barnyardgrass, and alligatorweed. Weed control with treatments including a herbicide with soil-residual activity was equivalent to or higher than imazethapyr applied alone followed by imazethapyr or imazamox. Yield and economical returns were maximized with quinclorac or penoxsulam mixed with imazethapyr followed by imazethapyr or imazamox. The addition of quinclorac or penoxsulam proved to be beneficial in a total weed management program.

En 2008 y 2009 se realizaron estudios de campo cerca de Crowley, Louisiana para evaluar la adición de un herbicida con actividad residual en el suelo, mezclado con imazethapyr aplicado en pos-emergencia muy temprana seguido de una aplicación de imazethapyr o imazamox dos semanas después de la aplicación inicial. Las malezas evaluadas incluyeron Oryza sativa, Echinochloa crus-galli y Althernanthera philoxeroides. El control de las malezas con tratamientos que incluyeron un herbicida con actividad residual en el suelo fue equivalente o mayor al obtenido con imazethapyr aplicado por sí solo seguido por imazethapyr o imazamox. El rendimiento y las utilidades netas se maximizaron con quinclorac o penoxsulam mezclado con imazethapyr seguido de imazethapyr o imazamox. La adición de quinclorac o penoxsulam probó ser benéfica en un programa integral de manejo de malezas.

Keywords

Imazamoximazethapyrpenoxsulamquincloracalligatorweed, Althernanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Grisebbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauvred rice, Oryza sativa L.Clearfield riceeconomicseconomic returns
Type
Weed Management—Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 410 - 416
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Arnold, R. N., Murray, M. W., Gregory, E. J., and Smeal, D. 1993. Weed control in pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with imazethapyr combinations. Weed Technol. 7:361–364.Google Scholar
Baltazar, A. M. and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1994. Propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 8:575–581.Google Scholar
Blouin, D. C., Webster, E. P., and Bond, J. A. 2011. On the analysis of combined experiments. Weed Technol. 25:165–169.Google Scholar
Braverman, M. P. 1995. Weed control in rice (Oryza sativa) with quinclorac and bensulfuron coating of granular herbicides and fertilizer. Weed Technol. 9:494–498.Google Scholar
Carey, V. F. III., Hoagland, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1995. Verification and distribution of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol. 9:366–372.Google Scholar
Carlson, T. P., Webster, E. P., Salassi, M. E., Hensley, J. B., and Blouin, D. C. 2011. Imazethapyr plus propanil programs in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol. 25:204–211.Google Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyuist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two of three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665–672.Google Scholar
Craigmiles, J. P. 1978. Introduction. Pages 5–6 in Eastin, E. F., ed. Red Rice Research and Control. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 1270.Google Scholar
Croughan, T. P. 1994. Application of tissue culture techniques to development of herbicide-resistant rice. Louisiana Ag. 37:25–26.Google Scholar
Daou, H. and Talbert, R. E. 1999. Control of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in rice (Oryza sativa) with carbaryl/propanil mixtures. Weed Technol. 13:65–70.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1994. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:279–299.Google Scholar
Griffin, R. M., Webster, E. P., Zhang, W., and Blouin, D. C. 2008. Biology and control of creeping rivergrass (Echinochloa polystachya) in rice. Weed Technol. 22:1–7.Google Scholar
Hager, A. G., Wax, L. M., Bollero, G. A., and Stroller, E. W. 2003. Influence of diphenylether herbicide application rate and timing on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:14–20.Google Scholar
Hydrick, D. E. and Shaw, D. R. 1994. Effects of tank-mix combinations of nonselective foliar and selective soil-applied herbicides on three weed species. Weed Technol. 8:129–133.Google Scholar
Khodayari, K., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Black, H. L. 1987. Red rice (Oryza sativa) control with herbicide treatments in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 35:127–129.Google Scholar
Klingaman, T. E., King, C. A., and Oliver, L. R. 1992. Effect of application rate, weed species, and weed stage of growth on imazethapyr activity. Weed Sci. 40:227–232.Google Scholar
[LSU AgCenter] Louisiana State University Agricultural Center Weed Control Guidelines. 2011. http://www.lsuagcenter.com/NR/rdonlyres/30649593-73E2-4DF0-99FF-3BC6496BF9EE/78010/11IRice.pdf. Accessed: December 6, 2011.Google Scholar
Masson, J. A. and Webster, E. P. 2001. Use of imazethapyr in water-seeded imidazolinone-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 15:103–106.Google Scholar
Masson, J. A., Webster, E. P., and Williams, B. J. 2001. Flood depth, application timing, and imazethapyr activity in imidazolinone-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 15:315–319.Google Scholar
Mudge, C. R., Webster, E. P., Leon, C. T., and Zhang, W. 2005a. Rice (Oryza sativa) cultivar tolerance to clomazone in water-seeded production. Weed Technol. 19:907–911.Google Scholar
Mudge, C. R., Webster, E. P., Zhang, W., and Leon, C. T. 2005b. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to clomazone plus bensulfuron and halosulfuron. Weed Technol. 19:879–884.Google Scholar
Pellerin, K. J., Webster, E. P., Zhang, W., and Blouin, D. C. 2003. Herbicide mixtures in water-seeded imidazolinone-resistant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 17:836–841.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis System. 2003. Version 9.1. Cary, NC Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1981. Control of red rice (Oryza sativa) in water-seeded rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci. 29:663–666.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. and Baltazar, A. M. 1992. Control of propanil-tolerant barnyardgrass. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 32:21.Google Scholar
Stidham, M. A. and Singh, B. K. 1991. Imidazolinone–acetohydroxyacid synthase interactions. Pages 71–90 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL CRC.Google Scholar
Stougaard, R. N., Shea, P. J., and Martin, A. R. 1990. Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:67–73.Google Scholar
Street, J. E. and Mueller, T. C. 1993. Rice (Oryza sativa) weed control with soil applications of Facet. Weed Technol. 7:600–604.Google Scholar
[WASDE] World agricultural supply and demand estimates. 2009. http://usda01.library.cornell.edu/usda/waob/wasde//2000s/2009/wasde-10-09-2009.txt. Accessed: December 6, 2011.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Baldwin, F. L., and Dillon, T. L. 1999. The potential for clomazone use in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 13:390–393.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Griffin, R. M., and Blouin, D. C. 2007. Herbicide programs for creeping rivergrass (Echinochloa polystachya) in rice. Weed Technol. 21:785–790.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P. and Levy, R. 2009. Weed management. Pages 46–71 in Saichuk, J., ed. Louisiana Rice Production Handbook. Pub. 2321. Baton Rouge, LA Louisiana State University Agricultural Center.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P. and Masson, J. A. 2001. Acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides on imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Weed Sci. 49:652–657.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2004. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 57:404–426.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Webster, E. P., Blouin, D. C., and Linscombe, S. D. 2004. Different tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa) varieties to clomazone. Weed Technol. 18:73–76.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Webster, E. P., and Selim, H. M. 2001. Effect of soil moisture on efficacy of imazethapyr in greenhouse. Weed Technol. 15:355–359.Google Scholar