Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:05:32.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Horse Purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum) Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. James Grichar
W. James Grichar*
Affiliation:
Tex. Agric. Exp. Stn., Box 755, Yoakum, TX 77995
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments in 1988 and 1989 evaluated five POST herbicides alone or combined for horse purslane control in peanut. Acifluorfen, acifluorfen plus bentazon, pyridate plus 2,4-DB, and lactofen controlled more than 75% when rated up to 26 days after treatment (DAT). However at 67 DAT, acifluorfen alone, acifluorfen plus bentazon or 2,4-DB, or lactofen applied EPOST controlled horse purslane greater than 60% in 1988. In 1989, only 2,4-DB or pyridate plus 2,4-DB controlled horse purslane at least 70% at 116 DAT. Pyridate alone did not control horse purslane adequately.

Keywords

Acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acidbentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxidelactofen, (+)-2-ethoxy-1-methyl-2-oxoethyl 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoatepyridate, O-(6-chloro-3-phenyl-4-pyridazinyl)-S-octyl carbonothioate2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acidpeanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘Florunner’horse purslane, Trianthema portulacastrum L. # TRTPOAcifluorfenbentazonpyridate2,4-DBlactofenTRTPO
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 570 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Balyan, R. S. 1985. Studies on the biology and competitive behavior of horse purslane (T. portulacastrum Linn.). Ph.D. Diss. Haryana Agric. Univ. Hisar (India).Google Scholar
2. Balyan, R. S. and Bhan, V. M. 1986. Emergence, growth, and reproduction of horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum) as influenced by environment conditions. Weed Sci. 34:516–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Balyan, R. S. and Malik, R. K. 1989. Control of horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in mung bean (Vigna radiata). Weed Sci. 37:695–699.Google Scholar
4. Balyan, R. S., Malik, R. K., Vedwan, R.P.S., and Bhan, V. M. 1987. Postemergence herbicides for weed control in mung bean. Trop. Pest. Manage. 33:20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chandra, B. and Sahai, R. 1979. Autecology of T. portulacastrum Linn. Indian J. Ecol. 6:17–21.Google Scholar
6. Correll, D. S. and Johnston, M. C. 1979. Manual of the Vascular Plants of Texas, 2nd ed. Univ. of Texas at Dallas, Richardson. p. 603.Google Scholar
7. Elmore, C. D. 1989. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:416.Google Scholar
8. MacDonald, G. E., Brecke, B. J., and Colvin, D. L. 1988. Evaluation of pyridate for postemergence weed control in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:64.Google Scholar
9. Wilcut, J. W. 1991. Economic yield response of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) to postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 5:416–420.Google Scholar
10. Wilcut, J. W., Swann, C. W., and Hagwood, H. B. 1990. Lactofen systems for broadleaf weed control in peanuts. Weed Technol. 4:819–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar