Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:37:03.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide programs for control of glyphosate-resistant canola (Brassica napus) in glyphosate-resistant soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2020

Allyson Mierau ,
Moria E. Kurtenbach ,
Eric N. Johnson ,
Robert H. Gulden ,
Jessica D. Weber ,
William E. May  and
Christian J. Willenborg Open the ORCID record for Christian J. Willenborg [Opens in a new window]
Allyson Mierau
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Moria E. Kurtenbach
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Eric N. Johnson
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Robert H. Gulden
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Jessica D. Weber
Affiliation:
General Manager, Western Applied Research Corporation, Scott, Saskatchewan, Canada
William E. May
Affiliation:
Crop Management Agronomist, Agriculture and Agrifood Canada, Indian Head, Saskatchewan, Canada
Christian J. Willenborg*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Christian J. Willenborg, Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CanadaS7N 5A8. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant (GR) canola is a widely grown crop across western Canada and has quickly become a prolific volunteer weed. Glyphosate-resistant soybean is rapidly gaining acreage in western Canada. Thus, there is a need to evaluate herbicide options to manage volunteer GR canola in GR soybean crops. We conducted an experiment to evaluate the efficacy of various PRE and POST herbicides applied sequentially to volunteer GR canola and to evaluate soybean injury caused by these herbicides. Trials were conducted across Saskatchewan and Manitoba in 2014 and 2015. All treatments provided a range of suppression (>70%) to control (>80%) of volunteer canola. All treatments with the exception of the glyphosate-treated control reduced aboveground canola biomass by an average of 96%. As well, canola seed contamination was reduced from 36% to less than 5% when a PRE and POST herbicide were both used. Moreover, all combinations of herbicides used had excellent crop safety (<10%). All PRE and POST herbicide combinations provided better control of volunteer canola compared with the glyphosate-only control, but tribenuron followed by bentazon and tribenuron followed by imazamox plus bentazon provided solutions that were low cost, currently available (registered in western Canada), and had the potential to minimize development of herbicide resistance in other weeds.

Keywords

GlyphosateCanola, Brassica napus L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrGlyphosate resistanceherbicide layeringsoybeanvolunteer canola
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , August 2020 , pp. 540 - 546
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Robert Nurse, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

References

Beckie, HJ (2010) Predicting prairie weeds at risk for glyphosate resistance. Proceedings of the National Meeting of the Canadian Weed Science Society, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, November 16–18, 2010Google Scholar
Beckie, H (2014) Status of herbicide resistance in Canada, in Heap I (2017) The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/Summary/Country.aspx?CountryID=7. Accessed: June 30 2016Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Owen, MDK (2007) Herbicide-resistant crops as weeds in North America. CAB Rev: Perspectives in Ag, Vet Sci, Nutri Nat Resources 2:22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Gulden, RH, Shaikh, N, Johnson, EN, Willenborg, CJ, Brenzil, CA, Shirriff, SW, Lozinski, C, Ford, G (2015) Glyphosate-resistant kochia (Kochia scoparia L. Schrad.) in Saskatchewan and Manitoba. Can J Plant Sci 95:345–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowley, SR (2015) A Hitchhiker’s Guide to Statistics in Biology. Generalized Linear Mixed Model Edition. Kincardine, ON, Canada: Plants et al. IncGoogle Scholar
Brabham, CB, Johnson, WG, Loux, MM, Dobbels, T (2011) Control of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-sensitive giant ragweed in soybean with adjuvant, fomesafen, and glyphosate tank mixtures. Crop Manag 10:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byker, HP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2013) Control of glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane [Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.] with preplant herbicide tank-mixes in soybean [Glycine max. (L). Merr.]. Can J Plant Sci 93:659–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Weed Science Society (2018) Description of 0-100 rating scale for herbicide efficacy and crop phytotoxicity. https://weedscience.ca/cwss-visual-ratings-scale/. Accessed: August 9, 2018Google Scholar
Cerdeira, AL, Duke, SO (2006) The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate resistant crops: a review. J Environ Qual 35:1633–1658CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Oliveira, EP, Kusano, DM, Pacheco, A, Nardelli, EMV, Da Rui, RF, Da Silva, MG, Teodoro, PE. and da Silva Junior, CA, (2015) Residual activity of 2,4-D amine on soybean plant development. J Agron 14:247–250Google Scholar
Deen, W, Hamill, A, Shropshire, C, Soltani, N, Sikkema, PH (2006) Control of volunteer glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays) in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Tech 20:261–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, SO, Lyndon, J, Becerril, JM, Sherman, TD, Lehnen, LP Jr, Matsumoto, H (1991) Protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 39:465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environment Canada (2016) Canadian climate normals 1981-2010 station data. Government of Canada. https://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_1981_2010_e.html?searchType=stnProv&lstProvince=SK&txtCentralLatMin=0&txtCentralLatSec=0&txtCentralLongMin=0&txtCentralLongSec=0&stnID=3328&dispBack=0. Accessed: February 20, 2016Google Scholar
Evans, JA, Tranel, PJ, Hager, AG, Schutte, B, Wu, C, Chathamb, LA, Davis, AS (2016) Managing the evolution of herbicide resistance. Pest Manag Sci 72:74–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, RK, McKercher, RB (1973) Laboratory incubation studies of chlorophenoxyacetic acids in chernozemic soils. Soil Biol Biochem 5:333–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulden, RH, Shirtliffe, SJ, Thomas, AG (2003a) Harvest losses of canola (Brassica napus) cause large seedbank inputs. Weed Sci 51:83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulden, RH, Shirtliffe, SJ, Thomas, AG (2003b) Secondary seed dormancy prolongs persistence of volunteer canola in western Canada. Weed Sci 51:904–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, WG, Lavy, TL, Gbur, EE (1995) Sorption, mobility, and degradation of triclopyr and 2,4-D and four soils. Weed Sci 43:678–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, VA, Fisher, LR, Jordan, DL, Edmisten, KE, Stewart, AM, York, AC (2012) Cotton, peanut, and soybean response to sublethal rates of dicamba, glufosinate, and 2,4-D. Weed Technol 26:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kah, M, Beulke, S, Brown, CD (2007) Factors influencing degradation of pesticides in soil. J Agric Food Chem 55:4487–4492CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karla, LG, Ronald, FK, Walters, SA (2019) Emerging challenges for weed management in herbicide-resistant crops. Agriculture 9:180Google Scholar
Knispel, AL, McLachlan, SM, Van Acker, RC, Friesen, LF (2008) Gene flow and multiple herbicide resistance in escaped canola populations. Weed Sci 56:72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, AN, Van Acker, RC, Friesen, LF (2006) Emergence timing of volunteer canola in spring wheat fields in Manitoba. Weed Sci 54:873–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, JY, Thomas, AG, Hall, LM, Brenzil, CA, Andrews, T, Brown, KR and Van Acker, RC (2005) Prairie weed survey of cereal, oilseed and pulse crops from the 1970s to the 2000s. Saskatoon, SK, Canada: Agriculture and Agri-Food CanadaGoogle Scholar
Lutman, PJW (1993) The occurrence and persistence of volunteer oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Aspects Appl Biol 35:29–36Google Scholar
O’Donavan, JT, Harker, KN, Dew, DA (2008) Effect of density and time of removal of volunteer canola (Brassica rapa L.) on yield loss of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Can J Plant Sci 88:839–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, DE, Thompson, CR, Shoup, DE, Jugulam, M (2015) Herbicide mode of action. http://www.bookstore.ksre.ksu.edu/pubs/c715.pdf. Accessed: June 30 2015Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2014) SAS/STAT® 13.2 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/67523/PDF/default/statug.pdf. Accessed: February 20, 2015Google Scholar
Seerey, NJ, Shirtliffe, SJ (2010) Commercial generations of Brassica napus cause greater yield loss in Triticum aestivum, than volunteer B. napus generations. Can J Plant Sci 90:777–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simard, MJ, Légère, A, Pageau, D, Lajeunesse, J, Warwick, S (2002) The frequency and persistence of volunteer canola (Brassica napus) in Quebec cropping systems. Weed Tech 16:433–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2006) Control of volunteer glyphosate-tolerant maize (Zea mays) in glyphosate-tolerant soybean (Glycine max). Crop Prot 25:178–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada (2018) Table 32-10-0359-01 - Estimated areas, yield, production and average farm price of principal field crops, in metric units, annual. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3210035901. Accessed: May 15, 2018Google Scholar
Somerville, GJ, Powles, SB, Walsh, MJ, Renton, M (2017) Why was resistance to shorter-acting pre-emergence herbicides slower to evolve? Pest Manag Sci 73:844–851CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Department of Agriculture (2019) Soybeans and oil crops overview. http://Ers. Usda. Gov/Topics/Crops/Soybeans-Oil-Crops. Aspx#.U5ypmfldxdl. Accessed: May 20, 2019Google Scholar
Van Wely, A, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Hooker, DC, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2015) Glyphosate-resistant common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) control with postemergence herbicides and glyphosate dose response in soybean in Ontario. Weed Technol 29:380–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vink, JP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, F, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2012) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) control with preplant herbicides in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Can J Plant Sci 92:913–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voos, G, Groffman, PM (1997) Relationships between microbial biomass and dissipation of 2,4-D and dicamba in soil. Bio Fertil Soils 24:106–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, AC, Stewart, AM, Vidrine, PR, Culpepper, AS (2004) Control of volunteer glyphosate-resistant cotton in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol 18:532–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar