Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:54:06.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbage Yield Losses in Perennial Pasture Due to Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Chad W. Grekul  and
Edward W. Bork
Chad W. Grekul
Affiliation:
410 AgFor Center, Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Science Department, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5
Edward W. Bork*
Affiliation:
410 AgFor Center, Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Science Department, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2P5
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the impact of Canada thistle (CT) on annual crop production is relatively well established, few investigations report on this weed's impact within perennial pastures. This field study assessed herbage yield losses within eight central Alberta pastures from 1999 to 2001. Each pasture was sampled in 1999 to quantify thistle and herbage biomass within 25 permanent plots. CT was controlled in 2000 and the response of vegetation measured in 2000 and 2001. Before removal, significant negative relationships (P < 0.05) between thistle abundance and herbage were noted at six sites. After thistle removal, herbage at several sites displayed positive responses. Both thistle density and biomass adequately predicted herbage yield loss. Yield losses due to CT can be substantial, peaking at 2 kg/ha for each kilogram of standing thistle biomass and 4.3 kg/ha with each additional thistle stem per square meter. Demonstrated yield losses were variable among sites however, likely due to factors such as heterogeneity in soils, available moisture, and variation in disturbance history or pasture vegetation composition. CT management in perennial pastures of western Canada may enhance pasture production, but further research is required to reliably predict the ability of pastures to respond.

Keywords

Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop # CIRARForage biomasspasture heterogeneityprecipitationsward compositionweed densityCT, Canada thistleN, nitrogenOM, organic matter
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 784 - 794
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alex, J. F. 1966. Survey of Weeds of Cultivated Land in the Prairie Provinces. Regina, SK, Canada: Experimental Farm, Research Branch, Canada Agriculture. 68 p.Google Scholar
Amor, R. L. and Harris, R. V. 1974. Distribution and seed production of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., in Victoria, Australia. Weed Res 14:317–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amor, R. L. and Harris, R. V. 1975. Seedling establishment and vegetative spread of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop., in Victoria, Australia. Weed Res 15:407–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, J. and Mrazek, K. 1995. “Modified Kelowna” test for available phosphorus and potassium in soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal 26:731–739.Google Scholar
Bendall, G. M. 1975. The allelopathic activity of Californian thistle (Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.) in Tasmania. Weed Res 15:77–81.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. 1990. Management and control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Rev. Weed Sci 5:193–250.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Khan, M. 1992. Yield loss assessment for spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) infested with Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 40:590–598.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Khan, M. 1996. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) effects on yield components of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 44:114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, M. S., Morrison, I. N., and Thomas, A. G. 1986. A weed survey of pedigreed alfalfa seed fields in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci 66:413–416.Google Scholar
Haggar, R. J., Oswald, A. K., and Richardson, W. G. 1986. A review of the impact and control of creeping thistle (Cirsium arvense L.) in grassland. Crop Prot 5:73–76.Google Scholar
Hartley, M. J. and James, T. K. 1979. Cost benefit of selective control of Californian thistle in pasture. in Proceedings of the 32nd New Zealand Weed Pest Control conference, New Zealand. Pp. 245–249.Google Scholar
Hay, J. R. and Ouellette, G. J. 1959. The role of fertilizer and 2,4-D in the control of pasture weeds. Can. J. Plant Sci 39:278–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. M. 1955. The influence of Canada thistle stand on yield of small grains. Proc. West. Weed Control conf. Pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. M. 1968. The Nature, Ecology, and Control of Canada Thistle. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bull. 1386. 32 p.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. in The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii. Pp. 217–224.Google Scholar
Hume, L. 1985. Crop losses in wheat (Triticum aestivum) as determined using weeded and nonweeded quadrats. Weed Sci. 33:734–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, J. Y., Thomas, A. G., and Hall, L. M. 2001. Alberta Weed Survey: Cereal, Oilseed, and Pulse Crops in 2001. Saskatoon, SK, Canada: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Weed Survey Series Pub. 02-1. 263 p.Google Scholar
Mamolos, A. P. and Kalburtji, K. L. 2001. Competition between Canada thistle and winter wheat. Weed Sci. 49:755–759.Google Scholar
McKeague, J. A. 1978. Manual On Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. 2nd ed. Ottawa, Canada: Subcommittee on Methods of Analysis, Canadian Soil Survey Committee, Canadian Society of Soil Science. 212 p.Google Scholar
McLennan, B. R., Ashford, R., and Devine, M. D. 1991. Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Competition with winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Weed Res 31:409–415.Google Scholar
Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 13. Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Can. J. Plant Sci 55:1033–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, J. R., Schaalje, G. B., and Bergen, P. 1991. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seed yield loss due to Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Technol. 5:723–728.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. A., Kossatz, V. C., Weiss, G. M., and Dew, D. A. 1982. An approach to estimating yield loss of barley due to Canada thistle. Can. J. Plant Sci 62:725–731.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, P. A., Weiss, G. M., and Kossatz, V. C. 1985. Indices of competition for estimating rapeseed yield loss due to Canada thistle. Can. J. Plant Sci 65:145–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1988. SAS/STAT™ User's Guide. Release 6.03 ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1028 p.Google Scholar
Schreiber, M. M. 1967. Effect of density and control of Canada thistle on production and utilization of alfalfa pasture. Weeds 15:138–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, K., Smith, L., and Rice, P. 2000. Using noxious weed lists to prioritize targets for developing weed management strategies. Weed Sci. 48:640–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stachon, W. J. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Allelopathic activity of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in Colorado. Weed Sci. 28:83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, A. G. and Wise, R. F. 1983. Peace River Region of British Columbia Weed Survey of Forage Crops 1978, 1979 and 1980. Regina, Saskatchewan: Agriculture Canada, Weed Survey Series Publ. 83-5. 155 p.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. G. 1981. Effect of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) residue on growth of some crops. Weed Sci. 29:159–164.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 662 p.Google Scholar