Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:49:23.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Halosulfuron Resistance in Smooth Pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) Populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Brian W. Trader ,
Henry P. Wilson ,
E. Scott Hagood  and
Thomas E. Hines
Brian W. Trader
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420
Henry P. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420
E. Scott Hagood
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060
Thomas E. Hines
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate the response to halosulfuron of several smooth pigweed populations that had been shown to be resistant to acetolactate synthase (ALS, EC 2.2.1.6)-inihibiting herbicides. Five ALS-resistant smooth pigweed populations (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) and one susceptible (S) population were treated with halosulfuron POST at 0.27, 2.7, 27, 270, and 2,700 g ai/ha. Percentage injury and dry weight were used to determine resistance of smooth pigweed populations to halosulfuron. Populations of smooth pigweed with previous reports of resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides showed varying degrees of resistance to halosulfuron compared with the susceptible population. Concentrations of halosulfuron required to reduce ALS-resistant smooth pigweed dry weights 50% were 2 to 12-fold higher than that of the susceptible population. One population, designated R2, had increased resistance to halosulfuron applications, requiring 97 g/ha halosulfuron to reduce shoot dry weight 50% compared with only 8 g/ha for S. Our results show that populations of smooth pigweed with a history of ALS-inhibiting resistance can have differing degrees of resistance to halosulfuron.

Keywords

Halosulfuronsmooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus (L.)acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicidesALS inhibitorsGR50weed resistance
Type
Weed Biology and Competition
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 460 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bernasconi, P., Woodworth, A. R., Rosen, B. A., Subramanian, M. V., and Siehl, D. L. 1995. A naturally occurring point mutation confers broad range tolerance to herbicides that target acetolactate synthase. J. Biol. Chem 270:17381–17385.Google Scholar
Chang, A. K. and Duggleby, R. G. 1998. Herbicide-resistant forms of Arabidopsis thaliana acetohydroxyacid synthase: characterization of the catalytic properties and sensitivity of four defined mutants. Biochem. J. 333:765–777.Google Scholar
Christopher, J. T., Powles, S. B., Liljegren, D. R., and Holtum, J. A. M. 1991. Cross-resistance to herbicides in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). II. Chorsulfuron resistance involves a wheat-like detoxification system. Plant Physiol 100:1036–1043.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D. and Eberlein, C. V. 1997. Physiological, biochemical and molecular aspects of herbicide resistance based on altered target sites. Pages 159–185. In Michael Roe, R., Burton, J. D., and Kuhr, R. J. Herbicide Activity: Toxicology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Amsterdam: IOS.Google Scholar
Gaeddert, J. W., Peterson, D. E., and Horak, M. J. 1997. Control and cross-resistance of an acetolactate synthase inhibitor-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) biotype. Weed Technol 11:132–137.Google Scholar
Guttieri, M. J., Eberlein, C. V., Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., and Hoffman, D. L. 1992. DNA sequence variation in domain A of the acetolactate synthase gene of herbicide resistant and susceptible weed biotypes. Weed Sci 40:670–676.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2008. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.com.Google Scholar
Lovell, S. T., Wax, L. M., Horak, M. J., and Peterson, D. E. 1996. Imidazolinone and sulfonylurea resistance in a biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Sci 44:789–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugo, Mde L., Gonzalez, A., and Talbert, R. E. 1995. Smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L.) interference with snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) quality. J. Agric. Univ P.R. 79:173–179.Google Scholar
Manley, B. S., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1996. Smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and livid amaranth (A. lividus) response to several imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Technol 10:835–841.Google Scholar
Manley, B. S., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1998. Characterization of imidazolinone-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus). Weed Technol 12:575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milliman, L. D., Riechers, D. E., Simmons, F. W., and Wax, L. M. 2000. Two biotypes of eastern black nightshade that are resistant to ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 55:86.Google Scholar
Mourad, G. and King, J. 1992. Effect of four classes of herbicides on growth and acetolactate-synthase activity in several variants of Arabidopsis thaliana . Planta 18:491–497.Google Scholar
Poston, D. H., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2000. Imidazolinone resistance in several Amaranthus hybridus populations. Weed Sci 48:508–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poston, D. H., Wu, J., Hatzios, K. K., and Wilson, H. P. 2001. Enhanced sensitivity to choransulam-methyl in imidazolinone-resistant smooth pigweed. Weed Sci 49:711–716.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. Pages 83–139. In Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J. A. M. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Ann Arbor, MI: Lewis.Google Scholar
Schabenberger, O. and Pierre, F. J. 2002. Contemporary statistical models for the plant and soil sciences. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. 1999. Resistance to acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors in the United States: history, occurrence, detection, and management. Weed Res 44:405–411.Google Scholar
Simpson, D. M. 1998. Understanding and preventing development of ALS-resistant weed populations. Down Earth 53:26–35.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Horak, M. J. 1997. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to selected ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 45:192–197.Google Scholar
Trader, B. W., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2007. Halosulfuron helps control several broadleaf weeds in cucumber and pumpkin. Weed Technol 21:966–971.Google Scholar
Tranel, P. J. and Wright, T. R. 2002. Resistance of weeds to ALS-inhibiting herbicides: what have we learned? Weed Sci 50:700–712.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2002. Weed survey—southern states, vegetable, fruit, and nut crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 55:245–247.Google Scholar
Whaley, C. M., Wilson, H. P., and Westwood, J. H. 2004. Characterization of a new ALS- inhibitor resistance mutation from the ALS gene of smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus). Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Abstr 44:161.Google Scholar
Whaley, C. M., Wilson, H. P., and Westwood, J. H. 2006. ALS resistance in several smooth pigweed (Amaranths hybridus) biotypes. Weed Sci 54:828–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, T. R., Bascomb, N. F., Sturner, S. F., and Penner, D. 1998. Biochemical mechanism and molecular basis for ALS-inhibiting herbicide resistance in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) somatic cell selections. Weed Sci 46:13–23.Google Scholar