Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:08:18.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Halauxifen-methyl preplant intervals and environmental conditions in soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2019

Marcelo Zimmer Open the ORCID record for Marcelo Zimmer [Opens in a new window] ,
Bryan G. Young  and
William G. Johnson
Marcelo Zimmer*
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Bryan G. Young
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
William G. Johnson
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Marcelo Zimmer, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Synthetic-auxin herbicides are often applied for horseweed control before soybean planting. However, certain days of planting interval must be maintained before soybean planting, depending on the product and rate used, because of potential crop phytotoxicity. Halauxifen-methyl is a new synthetic-auxin herbicide for horseweed control in preplant applications in soybean. Field experiments were conducted in 2015 and 2016 in Indiana to evaluate soybean phytotoxicity in response to applications of halauxifen-methyl (5 g ae ha−1) at five preplant intervals (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks before planting [WBP]). In 2015, soybean phytotoxicity was not observed for any of the preplant intervals at any of the sites. In 2016, 0% to 15% phytotoxicity was observed at 14 d after planting (DAP) when halauxifen-methyl was applied at planting, 1 WBP, and 2 WBP at different sites. Soybean phytotoxicity was expressed in the unifoliate leaves only at 14 DAP. However, the first trifoliate did not show any injury symptoms at 21 DAP from any preplant application timing. Preplant application intervals for halauxifen-methyl did not affect soybean stand counts or grain yield in any site-year. Therefore, field results indicated that halauxifen-methyl applied alone can cause slight soybean phytotoxicity in preplant applications. In growth-chamber bioassays, reductions in soybean biomass, plant length, and emergence were accentuated at 30 C, compared with 20 or 15 C, when halauxifen-methyl was applied at 20 or 40 g ae ha−1. These results contradict the currently held paradigm in which lower temperatures generally increase crop phytotoxicity levels to herbicide soil residual.

Keywords

Amit Jhala, University of Nebraska, LincolnSpring preplant applicationphytotoxicitysynthetic auxins.2,4-Ddicambahalauxifen-methylhorseweed, Erigeron canadensis L. ERICAsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 680 - 685
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (2010a) Clarity® herbicide. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld797012.pdf. Accessed: October 25, 2018Google Scholar
Anonymous (2010b) 2, 4-D Amine. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ldEL8000.pdf. Accessed: October 25, 2018Google Scholar
Anonymous (2013) Shredder® 2, 4-D LV6. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ldAO5005.pdf. Accessed: October 25, 2018Google Scholar
Anonymous (2017a) XtendimaxTM supplemental labeling. http://www.xtendimaxapplicationrequirements.com/documents/35008r4-8_xtendimax_dt_soybean-supplemental_label.pdf. Accessed: October 25, 2018Google Scholar
Anonymous (2017b) Introducing ElevoreTM herbicide– Elevate your perception of burndown with Elevore herbicide, offering thorough control of labeled broadleaf weeds, including superior control of marestail up to 8 inches tall. http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDAS/dh_0997/0901b803809973ab.pdf?filepath%3dpdfs/noreg/010-43764.pdf&fromPage%3dGetDoc. Accessed: October 25, 2018Google Scholar
Anonymous (2017c) ElevoreTM. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ldE1J001.pdf. Accessed: October 25, 2018Google Scholar
Bruce, JA, Kells, JJ (1990) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soybeans (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 4:642–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, HH, Lehmann, RG (1985) Characterization of herbicide degradation under field conditions. Weed Sci 33:7–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Gibson, KD, Johnson, WG (2008) A field survey to determine distribution and frequency of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in Indiana. Weed Technol 22:331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesen, HA, Dew, DA (1966) The influence of temperature and soil moisture on the phytotoxicity of dicamba, picloram, bromoxynil, and 2, 4-D ester. Can J Plant Sci 46:653–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furr, GF (1982) Soil survey of LaPorte County, Indiana. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Government Printing Office. 162 p.Google Scholar
Gauvrit, C, Gaillardon, P (1991) Effect of low temperatures on 2, 4-D behavior in maize plants. Weed Res 31:135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzler, B (2017) Evaluating herbicide injury on soybean. https://crops.extension.iastate.edu/cropnews/2017/05/evaluating-herbicide-injury-soybean. Accessed: November 23, 2018.Google Scholar
Heap, I (2017) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: October 25, 2018Google Scholar
Jhala, A (2017) PPO-inhibiting herbicides and soybean seedling injuries. https://cropwatch.unl.edu/2017/ppo-inhibiting-herbicides-and-soybean-seedling-injuries. Accessed: November 23, 2018.Google Scholar
Krausz, RF, Kapusta, G, Matthews, JL (1993) Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to 2, 4-D ester applied preplant. Weed Technol 7:906–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, GR, Davis, VM, Weller, SC, Stachler, JM, Loux, MM, Johnson, WG (2009) Frequency, distribution, and characterization of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) biotypes with resistance to glyphosate and ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 57:652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legleiter, T, Johnson, WG, Ruhl, G (2014) Soybean seedling injury. https://ag.purdue.edu/btny/weedscience/Documents/PPOInjuredsoybean.pdf. Accessed: November 23, 2018.Google Scholar
Loux, M, Stachler, J, Johnson, B, Nice, G, Davis, V, Nordby, D (2006) The Glyphosate, Weeds, and Crops Series. Biology and Management of Horseweed. Purdue Extension. https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/gwc/gwc-9-w.pdf. Accessed: September 11, 2017Google Scholar
Loux, MM, Doohan, D, Dobbles, AF, Johnson, WG, Young, BG, Legleiter, TR, Hager, A (2017) 2017 Weed control guide for Ohio, Indiana and Illinois. https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/u.osu.edu/dist/7/3461/files/2016/12/2017-Weed-Control-Guide-tnkpfi.pdf. Accessed: June 25, 2019.Google Scholar
Marshall, DL (2011) Soil survey of Jennings County, Indiana. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.Google Scholar
Shaner, DL (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. 513 p.Google Scholar
Shibasaki, K, Uemura, M, Tsurumi, S, Rahman, A (2009) Auxin response in Arabidopsis under cold stress: underlying molecular mechanisms. Plant Cell 21:3823–3838CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swantek, JM, Sneller, CH, Oliver, LR (1998) Evaluation of soybean injury from sulfentrazone and inheritance of tolerance. Weed Sci 46: 271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Switalski, D, Rutter, B, Hecht, L (2017) ElevoreTM herbicide receives federal EPA registration. http://www.dowagro.com/en-us/usag/news-and-resources/newsroom/2017/august/30/elevore-herbicide-receives-federal-epa-registration. Accessed: October 25, 2018Google Scholar
Taylor-Lovell, S, Wax, LM, Nelson, R (2001) Phytotoxic response and yield of soybean (Glycine max) varieties treated with sulfentrazone or flumioxazin. Weed Technol 15:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, MA, Steckel, LE, Ellis, AT, Mueller, TC (2007) Soybean tolerance to early preplant applications of 2, 4-D ester, 2, 4-D amine, and dicamba. Weed Technol 21:882–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, JS, Worsham, DA (1988) Combinations of nonselective herbicides for difficult to control weeds in no-till corn, Zea mays, and soybeans, Glycine max. Weed Sci 36:648–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, TR, Wolf, DR (1998) Soil survey of Tippecanoe County, Indiana. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.Google Scholar