Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:47:50.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth Response of Wild Poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) Following Foliar Herbicide Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Teresa S. Willard  and
James L. Griffin
Teresa S. Willard
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Crop Physiol., 302 Life Sci. Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
James L. Griffin
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Crop Physiol., 302 Life Sci. Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to characterize wild poinsettia growth response to imazaquin (140 g ai ha−1), fomesafen and acifluorfen (420 g ai ha−1), and chlorimuron (9 g ai ha−1) applied at 5 to 7 cm (POST1), 8 to 10 cm (POST2), and 15 to 20 cm (POST3). Based on reductions in weed height and lateral branch number 28 DAT, wild poinsettia was controlled more effectively in both greenhouse and field studies for all herbicides applied at POST1 than at POST3. In the greenhouse studies, reduction in wild poinsettia biomass with the herbicides 28 DAT was similar when applied at POST1 and POST2 and, with the exception of chlorimuron, was higher at POST2 than at POST3. In the field study, weed biomass reduction measured approximately 4 mo after herbicide application was higher for imazaquin, acifluorfen, and chlorimuron applied at POST2 than at POST1. Wild poinsettia biomass was reduced more with imazaquin applied at POST3 than at POST1. Increased lateral branch production, indicative of decreased weed control, was often manifested in higher seed production per plant. With application of all herbicides at POST3 seed production was equal to the untreated check.

Keywords

Acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acidchlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidfomesafen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-N-(methylsulfonyl)-2-nitrobenzamideimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidwild poinsettia, Euphorbia heterophylla L. # EPHHLGrowth characteristicsregrowthseed productionEPHHL
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 190 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Harger, T. R. and Nester, P. R. 1980. Wild poinsettia: a major soybean weed. Louisiana Agric. 23:4,5,7.Google Scholar
2. Hutchinson, J. and Dalziel, J. M. 1954. Flora of West Tropical Africa. Vol. I. Part 1. Crown Agents, London, 828 p.Google Scholar
3. Jowers, H. E., Breman, J. W., and Fletcher, J. W. 1986. Effects of several herbicide treatments on wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla L.) control in soybean. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla. Proc. 45:115–117.Google Scholar
4. Langston, V. B., Harger, T. R., and Johnsey, P. S. 1984. Potential for adventitious regeneration of selected weed species. Weed Sci. 32: 360–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Nester, P. R., Harger, T. R., and McCormick, L. L. 1979. Weed watch-wild poinsettia. Weeds Today 10:24–25.Google Scholar
6. Rodriguez, G. S. and Cepero, G. S. 1984. Number of seeds produced by some weed species. Cent. Agric. 11:45–50.Google Scholar
7. Shaner, D. L. 1991. Physiological effects of the imidazolinone herbicides. p. 129–137 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
8. Wilson, A. K. 1981. Euphorbia heterophylla: a review of distribution, importance and control. Trop. Pest Manage. 27:32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar