Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:03:27.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and Development of Giant Burreed (Sparganium eurycarpum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John W. Leif III
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Plant Genet., Univ. Minn., St. Paul, MN 55108
Ervin A. Oelke
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Plant Genet., Univ. Minn., St. Paul, MN 55108

Abstract

Outdoor experiments were conducted at two locations in Minnesota to characterize the growth, development, and vegetative reproduction potential of giant burreed grown with and without wild rice. Giant burreed growth was influenced by environment more than the presence of wild rice. Shoots emerged from corms 2 to 3 wk after planting (WAP), and continued throughout the growing season. Giant burreed attained a maximum height of 135 cm with an average 36 shoots/plant. Rhizome production started 4 to 6 WAP, and continued throughout the growing season. Corm formation at the base of shoots started 8 WAP and continued throughout the growing season. Rhizomes grew to a maximum cumulative length of 2500 cm/plant spreading in all directions and produced up to 250 buds/plant. Corm and rhizome bud viability was 15 and 10%, respectively. These data suggest that giant burreed grown in wild rice should be controlled by 2 to 3 wk after emergence to prevent vegetative reproduction.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R. N. 1968. Germination and Establishment of Weeds for Experimental Purposes. W. F. Humphrey Press, Inc., Geneva, NY.Google Scholar
2. Campbell, D. H. 1899. Studies on the flower and embryo of Sparganium . Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 3rd Ser., Bot. 1:293328.Google Scholar
3. Claus, J. S., and Behrens, R. 1976. Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci. 24:149152.Google Scholar
4. Clay, S. A. 1986. Interference and control of giant burreed (Sparganium eurycarpum) in wild rice (Zizania palustris). Ph.D. thesis. Univ. Minn., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
5. Clay, S. A., and Oelke, E. A. 1987. Effects of giant burreed (Sparganium eurycarpum) and shade on wild rice (Zizania palustris). Weed Sci. 35:640646.Google Scholar
6. Cook, D.D.K. 1962. Sparganium erectum L. J. Ecol. 50:247255.Google Scholar
7. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Grays Manual of Botany. Eighth ed. American Book Co., New York. p. 1621.Google Scholar
8. Lueschen, W. E., Martin, R. R., and Furrer, J. D. 1981. Guidelines for using pipewick and other selective applicators. Extension Folder 607–1981. Agric. Ext. Serv., Univ. Minn., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
9. McWhorter, C. G. 1961. Morphology and development of johnsongrass plants from seeds and rhizomes. Weeds 9:558562.Google Scholar
10. Moosavia-Nia, H., and Dore, J. 1979. Factors affecting glyphosate activity in Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. and Cyperus rotundus L. II. Effects of shade. Weed Res. 19:321327.Google Scholar
11. Oyer, E. B., Gries, G. A., and Rogers, B. J. 1959. The seasonal development of johnsongrass plants. Weeds 7:1319.Google Scholar
12. Smith, E. V., and Fick, G. L. 1938. Nut grass eradication studies: I. Relation of the life history of nut grass, Cyperus rotundus L., to possible methods of control. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 10:107113.Google Scholar
13. Steinbauer, G. P., and Neal, O. 1948. Dormancy and germination of seeds of the burreeds, Sparganium spp. Mich. Acad. Sci. Arts. Let. Papers 34:3337.Google Scholar