Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:05:38.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Great Plains Yucca (Yucca glauca) Control on Shortgrass Rangelands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2018

Walter H. Fick  and
Keith Harmoney
Walter H. Fick*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
Keith Harmoney
Affiliation:
Professor, Kansas State University, Western Kansas Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Walter H. Fick, Kansas State University, Department of Agronomy, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, 1712 Claflin Road, Manhattan, KS 66506. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Great Plains yucca is a native species that competes with forage plants for space and water and at high densities may warrant control. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of seven herbicides applied in the spring or fall for Great Plains yucca control. Six foliar herbicides applied by ground application at 187 L ha−1 spray volume, one herbicide applied to individual plant whorls, and a nontreated check were established in June and September of 2009 and 2011. Percent mortality was determined 12 to 16 mo after herbicide application. Most herbicides gave similar control between the 2 yr, with triclopyr in diesel applied to individual plant whorls at 10 g L−1 providing the greatest control at 83%. Most herbicides applied in June near the blooming stage of Great Plains yucca were more effective than September treatments. June treatments providing the greatest reduction in yucca densities were metsulfuron + dicamba + 2,4-D amine + 2,4-D low volatile ester (LVE) at 21 + 113 + 325 + 431 g ae ha−1, metsulfuron + aminopyralid + triclopyr at 49 + 9 + 227 g ha−1, metsulfuron + chlorsulfuron + 2,4-D LVE at 34 + 11 + 431 g ha−1, and metsulfuron + aminopyralid + 2,4-D LVE at 49 + 9 + 431 g ha−1. A single application of a foliar herbicide provided a maximum of 72% mortality of Great Plains yucca, suggesting that repeat application may be necessary to achieve optimum control.

Keywords

Andrew Kniss, University of Wyoming2,4-DaminopyralidchlorsulfurondicambametsulfurontriclopyrGreat Plains yuccaYucca glauca Nutt.Flowering stagefoliar herbicidesplant whorlsrepeat treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 192 - 195
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Cite this article: Fick WH, Harmoney K (2018) Great plains yucca (Yucca glauca) control on shortgrass rangelands. Weed Technol 33:192–195. doi: 10.1017/wet.2018.85

References

Anonymous (2015) Escort® XP herbicide product label. EPA Reg. No. 432-1549. Research Triangle Park, NC: Bayer CropScience. P 1 Google Scholar
Barnes, PW, Harrison, AT, Heinisch, SP (1984) Vegetation patterns in relation to topography and edaphic variation in Nebraska sandhills prairie USA. Prairie Nat 16:145–158 Google Scholar
Bovey, RW (1964) Control of yucca by aerial application of herbicides. J Range Manage 4:194–196 Google Scholar
Carlton, MA (1890) Characteristic sand-hill flora. Transactions of the Twenty-Second Meeting of the Kansas Acad Sci 7(1):32–34 Google Scholar
Herbel, CH, Nelson, AB (1966) Species preference of Hereford and Santa Gertrudis cattle on a southern New Mexico range. J Range Manage 19:177–181 Google Scholar
Kingsolver, RW (1986) Vegetative reproduction as a stabilizing feature of the population dynamics of Yucca glauca . Oecologia 69:380–387 Google Scholar
Kinraide, TB (1984) The influence of soil texture on the vegetation of a grazed short-grass prairie in Colorado USA. Southwest Prairie Nat 29:277–288 Google Scholar
Masters, RA, Marietta, KL, Britton, CM (1988) Response of yucca to fire, herbicide, and mechanical treatments. Texas J Agr Natural Res 2:4–6 Google Scholar
Milchunas, DG, Noy-Meir, I (2004) Geologic grazing refuges and grassland diversity: a shortgrass steppe study. J Range Manage 57:141–147 Google Scholar
Oliver, BL (1984) Chemical Control of Yucca. MS thesis. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University. 82 pGoogle Scholar
Parmenter, RR (2008) Long-term effects of a summer fire on desert grassland plant demographics in New Mexico. Rangeland Ecol Manag 61:156–168 Google Scholar
Reppert, JN (1960) Forage preference and grazing habits of cattle at the Eastern Colorado Range Station. J Range Manage 13:58–65 Google Scholar
Rittenhouse, LR, Clanton, DC, Streeter, CL (1970) Intake and digestibility of winter range forage by cattle with and without supplements. J Animal Sci 31:1215–1221 Google Scholar
Rosiere, RE, Beck, RF, Wallace, JD (1975) Cattle diets on semidesert grassland: botanical composition. J Range Manage 28:89–93 Google Scholar
Sosebee, RE, Churchill, FM, Green, CW (1982) Soil water depletion by yucca. J Range Manage 35:774–776 Google Scholar
Steel, RGD, Torrie, JH (1960) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill. 481 pGoogle Scholar
Thompson, CR, Peterson, DE, Fick, WH, Stahlman, PW, Wolf, RE (2009) Chemical weed control for field crops, pastures, rangeland, and noncropland, 2009. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service SRP 1007 Google Scholar
[USDA-NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Natural Resources Conservation Service (2018) The PLANTS Database. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed: March 15, 2018 Google Scholar
Winder, JA, Bailey, CC, Walker, DA (1995) Genetic aspects of diet selection in the Chihuahuan desert. J Range Manage 48:549–553 Google Scholar
Winder, JA, Bailey, CC, Walker, DA (1996) Effect of breed on botanical composition of cattle diets on Chihuahuan desert range. J Range Manage 49:209–214 Google Scholar